The Role of Maritime English in Enhancing Teamwork and Collaboration among Malaysian Seafarers

Effective communication is a cornerstone of safe and efficient maritime operations, especially in the context of multinational crews working in dynamic and often high-pressure environments. Maritime English, as the standardised language used onboard ships, plays a pivotal role in fostering both teamwork and collaboration among seafarers. This study explores the impact of Maritime English proficiency on teamwork and collaboration among Malaysian seafarers. Through a mixed-methods approach that integrates survey data and semi-structured interviews, the research examines how Maritime English proficiency influences interpersonal communication, task coordination, and team cohesion in multicultural maritime settings. The findings reveal that higher levels of Maritime English proficiency directly contribute to more effective collaboration, particularly during critical operations and emergency scenarios where clarity and precision in communication are crucial. In contrast, language barriers often impede team coordination and may compromise operational safety. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on language proficiency in maritime settings, providing valuable insights into the role of Maritime English in team dynamics and safety. By focusing on Malaysian seafarers, the study offers context-specific insights into the linguistic and cultural dimensions of teamwork at sea. These insights carry important implications for maritime education and training institutions, underscoring the need for specialised language training that prepares seafarers to operate confidently and cooperatively in diverse, multilingual environments.

Maritime English, language proficiency

1. Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2020). Maritime English and the Continuum of Communicative Competence. Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(2), 231–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bouzón, R., Antón-Sancho, Á., Amado-Sánchez, Y., & Vergara, D. (2023). Relevance of Communicative, Team Effectiveness, and Long-Range Planning Skills in Vessel Crewmembers. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 965-984. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16251a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brenker, M., Möckel, S., Küper, M., & Schröder, H. (2017). Challenges of multinational crewing: A qualitative study with cadets. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0117-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Evangelos, T. (2002). Language Barriers and Miscommunication as a Cause of Maritime Accidents. Thesis, Merchant Marine Academy of Macedonia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gabedava, G., & Hu, Y. (2025). Enhancing maritime Safety Through Linguistic Analysis: A Case Study of Communication Failures in Maritime Accidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-025-00371-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ghosh, S., & Emad, G. R. (2024). Developing and Implementing a Skills and Competency Framework for MASS Operators: Opportunities and Challenges. In G. R. Emad & A. Kataria (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Maritime Autonomy and Remote Navigation (ICMAR NAV 2023), 27–30 November 2023, Launceston, Tasmania (Vol. 2, pp. 1–7). EPiC Series in Technology. Australian Maritime College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giovanoglou, E. (2025). Teaching Maritime English in a Multicultural Crew Context: Enhancing Communication and Cultural Competence. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies. Vol. 10, No. 2, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Heikal, S., Abdelbarry, A., Swidan, A., Khatab, M., & Alghaffari, S. (2024). Non-native English-speaking seafarers: An Investigation into Communicational Challenges and Consequent Impact on High Retention Rates. Maritime Research and Training Journal, 3(2), 1–15. https://apc.aast.edu/ojs/index.php/MRT/article/download/MRT.2024.03.2.967/pdf_31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Heslop, I. Q. (2023). Seafarers' Perception on Maritime English Utilization on Board. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS). Vol. 6, Issue 4. DOI: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hetherington, C., Flin, R., & Mearns, K. (2006). Safety in Shipping: The Human Element. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hynnekleiv, A., Lützho, M. & Earthy, J. V. (2020). Towards an Ecosystem of Skills in the Future Maritime Industry. Royal Institution of Naval Architects International Conference on Human Factors 19–20 February 2020, London, UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in Organizations: From Input–Process–Output Models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2001). Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP) (Resolution A.918(22)). Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/safety/pages/standardmarinecommunicationphrases.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2011). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended in 2010 (Manila Amendments). Retrieved from: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/humanelement/pages/stcw-convention.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. James, A. J., Schriever, U. G., Jahangiri, S., & Girgin, S. C. (2018). Improving Maritime English Competence as the Cornerstone of Safety at Sea: A Focus on Teaching Practices to Improve Maritime Communication. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0145-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2024). How to Mix Methods: A Guide to Sequential, Convergent, and Experimental Research Designs. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000404-00 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kilpi, V., Solakivi, T., & Kiiski, T. (2021). Maritime Sector at Verge of change: Learning and competence Needs in Finnish Maritime Cluster. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00228-0[1](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13437-021-00228-0) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Maternová, A., Materna, M., Dávid, A., Török, A., & Švábová, L. (2023). Human Error Analysis and Fatality Prediction in Maritime Accidents. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(12), 2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122287 [1] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Narayanan, S. C., Emad, G. R., & Fei, J. (2023). Theorizing Seafarers’ Participation and Learning in an Evolving Maritime Workplace: An Activity Theory Perspective. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023-00311-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Newton, N. (2010). The Use of Semi-Structured Interviews in Qualitative Research: Strengths and Weaknesses. Paper Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Bristol. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-Structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sampson, H., & Zhao, M. (2003). Multilingual Crews: Communication and the Operation of Ships. World Englishes, 22(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Saridaki, E. (2023). Τhe Necessity of Maritime English for the Shipping Industry. International Academic Social Resources Journal, Vol:8, Issue:45; 1908-1913. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASRJOURNAL.67256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Schriever, U. G. (2008). Maritime Communication in an International and Intercultural Discourse. University of Tasmania. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.25959/23225780.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team Building and its Influence on Team Effectiveness: An Examination of Conceptual and Empirical Developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 117–153). North-Holland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Trenkner, P., & Cole, C. (2012). The STCW Manila Amendments and their impact on Maritime English. Polish Maritime Research, Year XIII, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ziarati, R. (2006). Safety at sea—applying Pareto analysis. Proceedings of World Maritime Technology Conference [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ziarati, R., Ziarati, M., & Çalbaş, B. (2012). Improving safety at sea and ports by developing standards for Maritime English. Polish Maritime Research, Year XIII, 239–244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. R. (2019). Project Management: A Benefit Realisation Approach. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03174-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar