The Role of Simulation in Cardiac Rhythm Identification During Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Accurate identification of cardiac rhythm during cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) is crucial for patient survival. According to American Heart Association guidelines [1–3], early defibrillation is essential for shockable rhythms—ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT)—while early epinephrine administration is required for non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and asystole.
This quasi-experimental pretest/posttest study aimed to compare rhythm recognition before and after simulation-based training. Seventy-five incoming pediatric residency physicians participated (final posttest sample: 53). Three rhythm-identification items—sinus bradycardia/PEA, VT, and VF—were evaluated in both assessments.
Training took place within an intensive course on pediatric emergency assessment and initial management. Pretest results showed correct recognition rates of 88% for VF, 84% for PEA, and 73.3% for pulseless VT. Posttest data demonstrated improved discrimination between shockable and non-shockable rhythms, particularly by eliminating confusion between PEA and shockable rhythms. However, persistent errors in rhythm interpretation and a statistically significant decline in VF recognition highlighted important weaknesses.
These findings underscore the need for more comprehensive and targeted training to ensure rapid and appropriate decisions during CPA. Although simulation was beneficial in specific aspects, its overall effectiveness for consolidating precise rhythm identification was limited. Future iterations of the program should incorporate a dedicated rhythm-recognition station and longitudinal reinforcement strategies.

Simulation Training, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Cardiac Arrest, Arrhythmia Recognition, Medical Education, Pediatrics.

1. American Heart Association. (2025). Highlights of the 2025 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Retrieved from: [https://cpr.heart.org/-/media/CPR-Files/2025-documents-for-cpr-heart-edits-posting/Resuscitation-Science/252500_Hghlghts_2025ECCGuidelines.pdf?sc_lang=en]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. American Heart Association. (2020). Part 6: Resuscitation education science: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 142(16_suppl_2), S551–S579. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. American Heart Association. (2020). Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support. In 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 142(16_suppl_2), S366–S468. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Nestel D, et al. Simulation in Healthcare Education: An international guide. John Wiley & Sons; 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):94-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Linto Imbago, P. S. (2024). Evaluación de la simulación clínica como estrategia para la adquisición de competencias profesionales en estudiantes de enfermería [Master's Thesis]. Universidad Europea. https://titula.universidadeuropea.com/bitstream/handle/20.500.12880/8225/Linto%20Imbago%20Imbago%2c%20Pamela%20Salome.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dieckmann P, Rall M, Fisher B, Glavin RJ. The theory and practice of simulation in health care. Clin Educ. 2007;21(1):25-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick L. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2000;75(8):787-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gaba DM. The future of simulation in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2-i10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Alinier G. A typology of simulation. Clin Teach. 2007;4(1):16-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2007). There's No Such Thing as "Nonjudgmental" Debriefing: A Theory and Method for Error-Free Discussions After Simulation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 105(4), S1-S8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition of expert performance: An overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(9), 988–992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Anijovich R, Cappelletti G, El Feki N, Sabelli MJ. Enseñar y aprender en el aula hospitalaria. Paidós; 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mednick, L., O'Connell, B., Graber, K., Roussin, C., & Weinstock, P. (2021). “Ready SIM Go”: An adapted simulation “Service Line” for patients and caregivers. Simulation in Healthcare, 16(2), 120-127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study