The Turnaround Principal: A Case Study in Relational Leadership

This chapter presents a qualitative case study on the unique leadership practices of a principal who transformed a struggling rural primary school in a low-income farming community. Previously on the verge of closure with an enrollment of fewer than 20 students, the school experienced a dramatic and sustained increase in student enrollment, reaching a stable population of 300. Through in-depth interviews and document analysis, this study examines how the principal's specific relational and community-centric leadership style not only saved the school but also built lasting trust and collaboration among parents and teachers. The chapter argues that this principal's success was rooted in a deeply empathetic and embedded leadership approach, offering a new framework for understanding effective leadership in small, rural educational settings that challenges traditional, top-down models. This study utilizes a qualitative case study methodology, drawing on semi-structured interviews with the principal, teachers, and parents, as well as an analysis of school documents. The findings reveal that the principal’s initial focus on building genuine trust and confidence through personal outreach and an open-door policy was the foundational step in the school’s revitalization. This relational approach was coupled with the implementation of innovative, holistic programs, including those for improving academic performance and extracurricular activities, as well as unique initiatives focused on student well-being (e.g., mindfulness) and the educational development of parents. By empowering all stakeholders as active partners, the principal created a vibrant school culture that directly contributed to the dramatic increase in student enrollment and a positive shift in community perception. The chapter culminates in the proposal of a new theoretical framework, embedded relational leadership, which suggests that effective leadership in marginalized communities is profoundly shaped by a leader's ability to become an integral, trusted member of that community, rather than a top-down manager.

Education

1. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence. National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Christensen, C., Horn, M., & Johnson, C. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Downey, R. G. (1978). Differences between entering freshmen from different size schools. Journal of College Student Personnel, 19(5), 353–358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Good, C. V. (Ed.). (1959). Dictionary of education (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Greenberg, J. (2001). Common characteristics of high performing school. Education Management, 3, 167–183. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=http://www.edmange.org. Report, Vol,3/24153 pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Resources Information Center Annual Review Paper, 29, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hallinger, P. (2003). Reshaping the landscape of school leadership and management: A global perspective. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(3), 207–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Laboratory for Student Success. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Linda, O., & Backner, E. W. (1980). Taking stock: The movement to create mini schools, school within schools, and separate small schools. Urban Diversity Series No. 106. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED 190297). Retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=http://www.eric.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Education Association. (2000). Effective factors for quality education and school management. Research Report. Retrieved from http://national.ed-as/research report/00524-pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nieto, S. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. අධ්‍යාපන පාසල් සංගණන වාර්තා, (1995-2017) අධ්‍යාපන හා උසස් අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශය, ඉසුරුපාය, බත්තරමුල්ල. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. අබේපාල, ආර්.(2004). නියැදිකරණය. සාර ප්‍රකාශන හා මුද්‍රණ, අතුරුගිරිය පාර, කොට්ටාව. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. අමරසේකර, ඩී.(2012, මාර්තු 11). පිටිසර පාසල් වැසී යාම සමාජ අර්බුදයක් ද. ඉරිදා ලංකාදීප. විජය ප්‍රකාශන, හුණුපිටිය, හරස් පාර, කොළඹ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. අමරසේන, ඩී. (2012, අගෝස්තු 26). සංර්වධනයත් සමඟ පරිහානියට පත් වන ග්‍රාමීය කුඩා පාසල. දිවයින ඉරිදා සංග්‍රහය. සී/ ස උපාලි පුවත්පත් සමාගම, කොළඹ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. කොඩිතුවක්කු, පී.(2004). ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ගම්බද පාසල්වල දරුවන් පාසල් හැරයාම පිළිබඳ අධ්‍යයනයක්. අධ්‍යාපන පර්යේෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව, ජාතික අධ්‍යාපන ආයතනය, මහරගම. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study