Toward Inclusive Digital Teaching in Malaysia: Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions

This study synthesizes equity- and accessibility-oriented approaches to digital teaching in Malaysian higher education and proposes a qualitative design to validate and extend the synthesis. The objectives are to (i) map persistent challenges limiting equitable participation in digital learning, (ii) consolidate practical strategies currently used by institutions and lecturers, and (iii) outline future directions that align with national policy (RMK-12, MyDIGITAL, and the Digital Education Policy). A narrative review of recent scholarship (2020–2025) and sector reports was conducted and organized into four domains—Technical, Pedagogical, Engagement, and Assessment & Feedback. The proposed empirical component comprises two purposively sampled focus groups with experienced lecturers using a semi-structured protocol; transcripts will be analysed through reflexive thematic analysis with double-coding to enhance coherence. The synthesis highlights recurring technical constraints (unstable internet, device shortages, digital divide), limited digital-pedagogy capacity and uneven UDL adoption, online isolation and low social presence, and assessment pressures linked to academic integrity and low-personalization feedback. Cross-cutting, evidence-informed strategies include low-bandwidth and offline contingencies, device-loan schemes and IT helpdesks, continuous professional development with mentoring, inclusive course design, interactive LMS with peer projects and breakout rooms, and formative/peer assessment with multimodal feedback. Future directions prioritize centres of excellence for teaching and learning, AI-enabled teaching assistants and adaptive/personalised learning within robust governance, institution-wide accessibility responsibilities and universal standards, predictive analytics for timely support, and QA rubrics that integrate integrity-by-design. Collectively, the framework provides a practicable roadmap that links immediate classroom tactics to institutional systems change. The forthcoming focus groups are expected to contextualize feasibility, surface discipline-specific nuances, and refine priorities for scalable, policy-aligned implementation in Malaysian universities.

Digital equity; accessibility; higher education (Malaysia); digital pedagogy

1. Afonso, A., Morgado, L., Carvalho, I. C., & Spilker, M. J. (2025). Facing challenges in higher education: Enhancing accessibility and inclusion through flexible learning design. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed Alnagrat, A. J., Che Ismail, R., Syed Idrus, S. Z., Abukhatowah, U. A., & Gopalan, V. (2022). Impact of digitalisation strategy in higher education: Technologies and new opportunities. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 12(1), 79–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akmal, M., Azevedo, J. P. W., Cobo Romani, J. C., Gilberto Sanzana, A. G., Hasan, A., & Muñoz-Najar, A. (2022). Remote learning during COVID-19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow. World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/160271637074230077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akpen, C., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on students’ performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Maqbali, A.H. & Al-Shamsi, A. (2023). Assessment Strategies in Online Learning Environments During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Oman. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (5):8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. AlRawi, J. M., & AlKahtani, M. A. (2021). Universal design for learning for educating students with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68(6), 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2021.1900505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Austin, A., & Kortemeyer, G. (2022). A systematic approach to quality online course design and development. EDUCAUSE Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ayasrah, M. N., Al-Masa’deh, M. M., Al-Rousan, A. H., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). Digital learning for students with disabilities. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 15(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v15i1.8203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., … Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., … Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Breen, P. (2018). Developing educators for the digital age: A framework for capturing knowledge in action. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chen, B., Seilhamer, R., Bennett, L., & Bauer, S. (2015). Students’ mobile learning practices in higher education: A multi-year study. EDUCAUSE Review, 7(3), 225–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chima, A. E., Onyebuchi, N. C., & Idowu, S. A. (2024). Online learning and community engagement: Strategies for promoting inclusivity and collaboration in education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Choi-Lundberg, D. L., Butler-Henderson, K., Harman, K., & Crawford, J. (2023). A systematic review of digital innovations in technology-enhanced learning designs in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Coleman, V. (2021). Digital divide in UK education during COVID-19 pandemic: Literature review (Cambridge Assessment Research Report). Cambridge Assessment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Correia, N., Almeida, T., Friães, R., & Cardoso, A. (2025). Bridging pedagogy, curriculum, and assessment in digital education: Ensuring a constructive alignment. Social Inclusion, 13, Article 9473. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.9473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dawadi, S., Goshtasbpour, F., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2024). Equitable access to higher education learning and assessment: Perspectives from low-resource contexts. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Deng, X., & El Hag, S. (2024). Digital Inequality and Two Levels of the Digital Divide in Online Learning: A Mixed Methods Study of Underserved College Students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 35(3), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.62273/SSIF6302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Díaz, A. F., & Estoque-Loñez, H. (2024). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of gamification on student learning achievement. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 12(5), 1236–1253. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Dong, C., Cao, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). Effects of online education on college students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120954489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Dong, C., Cao, S., & Zhu, C. (2021). Internet access and online learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a survey in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, 105866. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Economic Planning Unit. (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan 2021–2025: A prosperous, inclusive, sustainable Malaysia. Prime Minister’s Department. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Eden, J., Rogers, R., & Hoffman, N. (2022). Impacting student satisfaction, engagement and motivation in online and traditional classrooms. KOME. https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.75672.91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. EDUCAUSE. (2025). 2025 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2025/5/2025-educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fernandes, R., Pacios, J., & Resende, M. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: A review of the literature. In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 177–185). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Fuentes, S., Newton, M., & Reed, J. (2021). Designing online learning to increase student engagement. Instructional Modules for Professional Learning Responding to Opportunities and Valuing Educators (IMPROVE), 30. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/improve/30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Geletu, G. M. (2023). The effects of pedagogical mentoring and coaching on teachers’ professional development practices and students’ learning engagements. Education 3–13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2293209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Guruge, D. B., Kadel, R., Shailendra, S., & Sharma, A. (2025). Building academic integrity: Evaluating the effectiveness of a new framework to address and prevent contract cheating. Societies, 15(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Haarala-Muhonen, A., Myyry, L., Pyörälä, E., Kallunki, V., Anttila, H., Katajavuori, N., Kinnunen, P., & Tuononen, T. (2023). The impact of pedagogical and ICT training in teachers’ approaches to online teaching and use of digital tools. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1223665. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1223665 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hidayat Ali, H., Bashir, R., Ali Raza, A., Ejaz, H., Shabir, R., & Aftab, M. J. (2024). Role of inclusive education in promoting equity in education: Teachers’ perspectives. Qualitative Research, 24(1), 133–151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hrastinski, S., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Stenbom, S. (2020). Engaging students through social media: Evidence-based practices in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hsu, J. L., Chen, D. Y., Cannon, J. G., & Rudd, J. A. (2022). Student motivations and barriers toward online and in-person office hours in STEM courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ismail, R. A. M. (2025). Bridging the digital divide in Malaysian education. Penang Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kemp, S. (2025, March 3). Digital 2025: Malaysia. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lee, Y. T., & Choi, J. (2021). Evaluation of digital feedback tools for improving students’ academic writing: A case study in Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 159, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2025). Accessible and inclusive online learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 37, 1306–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09424-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ma, H., & Ismail, L. (2025). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of digital competence in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 185. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04401-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024). How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83, 18185–18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Martin, F., Swapna, K., Ritzhaupt, A., & Polly, D. (2024). Bichronous online learning: Perspectives, best practices, benefits, and challenges from award-winning online instructors. Online Learning, 28(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Meyer, A., Kleinknecht, M., & Richter, D. (2023). What makes online professional development effective? The effect of quality characteristics on teachers’ satisfaction and changes in their professional practices. Computers & Education, 200, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2023). Digital education policy. Educational Resources and Technology Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Moorhouse, B.L., Wong, K.M. (2022). Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies and instructional approaches to facilitate remote learning. J. Comput. Educ. 9, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00195-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Mykota, D. (2025). A Meta-Analysis of Social Presence in Higher Education Online Environments. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2025.v40.i1.1351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2023). A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration from 2012–21: Collaboration technologies, design, facilitation, and outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Parmigiani, D., Nicchia, E., Murgia, E., & Ingersoll, M. (2024). Formative assessment in higher education: An exploratory study within programs for professionals in education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1366215. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1366215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2008). Issues and challenges related to digital equity. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 765–778). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Ryan, T., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2019). Feedback modes matter: Comparing student perceptions of audio, video, and text feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1533711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2023). Effective Teacher Professional Development: New Theory and a Meta-Analytic Test. Review of Educational Research, 95(2), 213-254. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480 (Original work published 2025) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tao, L., Cukurova, M., & Song, Y. (2025). Learning analytics in immersive virtual learning environments: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 12, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00370-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/4jx4-xg23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Wu, Y., & Chen, D. (2021). Effects of video feedback on students’ learning in online higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1589–1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Xiao, J., Liu, S., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of AI in open and distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study