Transformative Pedagogies in Action: The “Click with Care” PR Campaign for Media Literacy among School Students

Authors

Tuan Sharifah Azura binti Tuan Zaki

Faculty Language and Communication, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nor Hafizah binti Abdullah

Faculty Language and Communication, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Norhidayu binti Hasan

Faculty Language and Communication, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Wan Norshira binti Wan Ghazali

Faculty Language and Communication, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nazra Aliff bin Nazri

Faculty Language and Communication, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100028

Subject Category: Communication

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 350-356

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-07

Accepted: 2025-11-14

Published: 2025-11-27

Abstract

The growing use of digital platforms has offered new opportunities while also creating concerns, particularly for school students. As a result, media literacy is a vital skill, particularly for school students who are still exposed to the negative effects of online misuse today.This paper discusses the application of the Service Learning Malaysia – University for Society (SULAM) approach in the “Click With Care” Public Relations campaign, which aimed to promote responsible online behaviour and critical thinking about digital content among secondary school students. The campaign occurred at Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Kompleks (SMK Kompleks) and engaged 149 Form Three students in interactive workshops, influencer sharing sessions, video presentations, and quizzes. The study adopted a participatory action research technique, which was augmented with post program teacher interviews, student comments, and reflective journals written by the university students who executed the campaign. The indicated improved awareness of misinformation, safer digital habits, and greater understanding of ethical online interaction. Data was confirmed observable positive changes in how students behaved online. In addition, the innovative and interactive activities improved learning engagement and effectiveness. For the university students, the reflective journals indicated progress in cooperation, event planning, communication, and social responsibility, illustrating the benefits of learning from actual involvement in the community. Finally, including community-based initiatives within academic programs may help students learn while also making important contributions to society. The "Click With Care" campaign demonstrates how practical and contextually relevant educational practices may better prepare pupils for today's digital issues.

Keywords

Transformative Pedagogy; SULAM; Public Relations; Media Literacy

Downloads

References

1. Abimbade, O. (2025). From creators to critical thinkers: How middle schoolers learn to spot and stop false information through media production. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Arfaj, L., Lee, J. S., Shelton, J. A., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impact of misinformation on the health of underrepresented youth during public health crises: A preliminary study. Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Arfaj, L., Lee, J. S., Shelton, J. A., Chen, Y., & others. (2025). Navigating the infodemic: A comprehensive review of research on misinformation's impact on minority youth. Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aledeh, M., Sokan-Adeaga, A. A., Adam, H., & Kotera, Y. (2024). Suggesting self-compassion training in schools to stop cyberbullying: A narrative review. Discover Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anyim, C., & Uche, C. (2013). An evaluation of digital learning programme for Nigerian schools: Focus on centres in Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) operational areas of the Niger Delta. International Journal of Technologies in Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barbosa, S. (2024). Enabling Digital Literacy Pedagogical Sessions (#DLPS): The case of Portugal. In Transforming media accessibility in Europe: Digital media, education and city space accessibility contexts. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Berezina, N. O., & Stepanova, M. I. (2020). The impact of digital education tools on the well-being of secondary school students. Public Health and Life Environment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Castillo, G., & Anand, S. (2025). Using AI to boost cybersecurity awareness: Implementing the NIST framework in schools. Communications in Computer and Information Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, G., Shuo, C., Chen, P., & Zhang, Y. (2022). An empirical study on the factors influencing users' continuance intention of using online learning platforms for secondary school students by big data analytics. Mobile Information Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fathi, A., Benabid, A., & Imadi, I. E. (2025). The impact of digital platforms on higher education through the flipped classroom and ICT. Personalized Learning Through Adaptive Systems and Intelligent Tutoring. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ghosh, A. K. (2016a). Taking a more balanced approach to adolescent mobile safety. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ghosh, A. K., & Wisniewski, P. (2016b). Understanding user reviews of adolescent mobile safety apps: A thematic analysis. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Grech, F., & Lauri, M. A. (2022). Cyberbullying and mental health of adolescents. Malta Medical Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Halpern, D., Piña, M., & Ortega-Gunckel, C. (2020). School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes. Comunicar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hobbs, R., & Rowe, J. (2008). Creative remixing and digital learning: Developing an online media literacy learning tool for girls. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Iskandar, R., Maksum, A., & Marini, A. (2025). Bridging the gap in digital citizenship literacy: Insights from young digital natives. Multidisciplinary Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jiang, Q., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, C. (2023). Investigating links between internet literacy, internet use, and internet addiction among Chinese youth and adolescents in the digital age. Frontiers in Psychiatry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Katz, A., & Brett, H. M. (2025). Offline factors influencing the online safety of adolescents with family vulnerabilities. Social Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–603). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kibsey, T. (2022). Protest to podium: Teaching argumentation to advance advocacy from social media to city hall. Communication Teacher. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kota, R., & Selkie, E. (2018). Cyberbullying and mental health. In M. Moreno (Ed.), Technology and adolescent mental health. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kumar, V. L., & Goldstein, M. A. (2020). Cyberbullying and adolescents. Current Pediatrics Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ladbrook, J. (2014). An interactive digital platform for preservice secondary English teachers' reading: First iteration findings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Li, Y., Chang, J., Yuan, M., & Su, P. (2021). Research progress of adolescent cyberbullying. Chinese Journal of School Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Livingstone, S. (2018). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. Communication Review, 21(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mayen, S., Reinhardt, A., & Wilhelm, C. (2025). The complexities of digital media use in adolescents’ learning and academic performance: An experience sampling study. Computers and Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). (2019). Service Learning Malaysia – University for Society (SULAM) Implementation Guidelines. Putrajaya: MOHE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Munasinghe, H., & Hewawasam, K. (2025). Uniting digital disciplines: Bridging literacy, ethics, and security among university students. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing: Converging Horizons (ICARC 2025). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mwijage, T., & Ghosh, A. (2024). The role of technology in enhancing adolescent online safety: Current trends and future directions. Proceedings – IEEE SoutheastCon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nurhayati, L., Supriadi, U., Jenuri, J., & Karim, A. (2025). Integrating digital citizenship and religious moderation in open and distance education: A holistic approach to character development in Indonesia. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Roehrer, E., Pokawinkoon, P., Watters, P., Scanlan, J., & others. (2024). Adolescent-centric design of an online safety chatbot. Journal of Computer Information Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Santre, S. (2023). Cyberbullying in adolescents: A literature review. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sharma, G., KulShrestha, S., & Mulani, P. (2024). Cyberbullying and its impacts on mental health. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Skipper, Y. (2025). ‘I’d probably scroll by’: An exploration of young people’s views on spotting and stopping misinformation. Children and Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sobodić, A., Balaban, I., & Filipović, D. (2022). Exploring students’ perspective of a platform for digital competence acquisition in schools. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Suárez-Perdomo, A., Garcés-Delgado, Y., & Arvelo-Rosales, C. N. (2025). Systematic review on adolescents’ construction of media literacy in educational settings. Review of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Šušterič, N., Ošljak, K. K., & Tašner, V. (2025). Exploring media literacy formation at the intersection of family, school, and peers. Media and Communication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Suwana, F. (2021). Content, changers, community and collaboration: Expanding digital media literacy initiatives. Media Practice and Education, 22(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tran, M. T., Ngo, B. N., Vo, T. K. O., & Trinh, L. T. (2024). Utilizing public relations for achieving success in enrollment: Observations drawn from an extensive study of higher educational institutions. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tsang, S. J. (2025). Insights from educators: Integrating AI literacy into media literacy education in practice. Journal of Media Literacy Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Van Der Merwe, P. (2014). How could life orientation teachers in secondary schools make use of the proposed digital media literacy program for teaching and learning? International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wisniewski, P., Badillo-Urquiola, K. A., & Ghosh, A. K. (2017). Understanding the unique online challenges faced by teens in the foster care system. CSCW 2017 – Companion of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Wisniewski, P., Carroll, J. M., Xu, H., & Rosson, M. B. (2013). Grand challenges of researching adolescent online safety: A family systems approach. Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Yang, J., & Li, F. (2024). Exploring the path of integrating media literacy into civic and political education of college students in the new media era. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yang, Z., Ren, Z., & Fan, G. (2024). Research on the cultivation of media literacy among adolescents from the perspective of smart education. Communications in Computer and Information Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zheng, J., & Kim, K. T. (2025). The driving force for sustaining future competencies for university students in the digital era: Learning strategies. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Zimmermann, E., & Tomczyk, S. (2025). Using social media to promote life skills among adolescents: A debate on opportunities, challenges, and implications for health and education. Journal of Prevention. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles