User Acceptance Testing and Evaluation of a Smart Student Rental Platform for Sustainable Campus Communities

Authors

Muhammad Danish Mohamad Jafri

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Durian Tunggal, Melaka, 76100 (Malaysia)

Nuridawati Mustafa

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Durian Tunggal, Melaka, 76100 (Malaysia)

Kurk Wei Yi

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Durian Tunggal, Melaka, 76100 (Malaysia)

Noorrezam Yusop

Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Durian Tunggal, Melaka, 76100 (Malaysia)

Halimaton Hakimi

Institute of Emerging Digital Technologies, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Persiaran UTP, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak 32610 Batu Gajah (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000487

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 5925-5938

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-28

Accepted: 2025-11-03

Published: 2025-11-17

Abstract

This paper presents the user acceptance testing (UAT) and evaluation of the Smart Student Rental Platform, a mobile application developed to promote sustainable resource sharing within university communities. The platform enables students to lend and rent academic or lifestyle items through a secure, centralized system that encourages affordability and reuse. User acceptance was evaluated using a structured questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), focusing on perceived ease of use, usefulness, capability, trust, and intention to use. Twenty-five university students participated in the testing after interacting with the functional prototype developed using Flutter and Firebase. The findings indicate a high level of user satisfaction, with respondents reporting that the application was easy to navigate, improved accessibility to essential items, and encouraged environmentally responsible behavior. Minor feedback highlighted the need for performance optimization. Overall, the results confirm that the system is both usable and beneficial for fostering sustainable consumption and community collaboration in campus environments.

Keywords

User Acceptance Testing (UAT),

Downloads

References

1. Jafri, M. D. b. M., Kurk, W. Y., Mustafa, N., Ikram, R. R. R., & Yusop, N. (2025). Design and Development of a Smart Student Rental Platform for Sustainable Campus Communities. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90900071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baeshen, Y. (2025). Adoption of ride-hailing apps in the shared economy: Extending UTAUT2 with mediating variables. Access: Journal of Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy, 6(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2025.6.2(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Liao, J.-H., Prasetyo, Y. T., Benito, O. P., Susanto, K. C., Cahigas, M. M., Nadlifatin, R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2024). The perceived usability of vehicle-sharing mobile application: An integration of UTAUT, pro-environmental behavior, and system usability scale. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 18, Article 101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101276/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Apaua, R., & Lallie, H. S. (2022). Measuring user perceived security of mobile banking applications. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.03052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mohd Muhiddin, A. A., Mohd Isa, H., Md Sakip, S. R., Mohd Nor, O., & Sedhu, D. S. (2023). Green campus implementation in the Malaysian public universities: Challenges and solutions. Planning Malaysia, 21(25). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i25.1239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mohamed, R. N., Borhan, H., Rusli, M. S., Abd Hafiz, K., Othman, A., Ridzuan, A. R., Md Razak, M. I., & Marmaya, N. H. (2024). Influence of app usability and learning environment on student behavior in mobile-based marketing education in Malaysian higher learning institutions. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.24191//jibe.v9i2.3200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zakaria, A., & Zurcher, S. A. (2023). An analysis of sustainability approaches of Malaysian public universities. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(23), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v8i23.4485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Rayenda Khresna Brahmana, & Evan Lau. (2024). Adoption of peer-to-peer (P2P) fintech lending: A study of socio-demographic factors. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(Special Issue), 54-76. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.8196.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cheah, W.-H., Jusoh, N. M., Aung, M. M. T., Ghani, A. A., & Rebuan, H. M. A. (2023). Mobile Technology in Medicine: Development and Validation of an Adapted System Usability Scale (SUS) Questionnaire and Modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Evaluate User Experience and Acceptability of a Mobile Application in MRI Safety Screening. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 33(01), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jafri, M. D. b. M. (2025). User acceptance testing survey for the UniLend Smart Student Rental Platform [Google Form questionnaire]. Google Forms. https://forms.gle/W432BE4PGQXzHBZn8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Arif, E., & Soko, I. P. (2022). The evaluation of web-based and Android face-to-face tutorial applications quality using the user acceptance testing (UAT) method. Journal of World Science, 1(8), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i8.76 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Anuar Shah Bali Mahomed, & Siti Salwa Sheikh Mokhtar. (2025). Technology Adoption and E-commerce Integration: A Study of Malaysian Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(5), 430-439. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90500037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Alshammari, M. M., & Al-Mamary, Y. H. (2025). User acceptance of AI-powered training: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Future Business Journal, 11, Article 239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00665-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nagy, S., & Hajdu, N. (2023). Consumer acceptance of the use of artificial intelligence in online shopping: evidence from Hungary. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nur Erma Suryani Mohd Jamel, Muhammad Irfan Jaffry, Nor Ratna Masrom, Nurul Farhaini Razali, Diana Rose Faizal, & Rasinah Mohamad. (2025). Technology Acceptance and the Metaverse: Insights from Malaysia’s Educational Landscape. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(7), 4747-4756. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles