Utilization of the New Public Governance Approach to Conflict Management: A Case Study of the Border Communities in Southern-Gambia

This study examines the application of the New Public Governance (NPG) approach to conflict management in the border communities of Southern Gambia, where persistent land disputes, resource scarcity, and political tensions undermine local stability and development. The main aim is to investigate how NPG principles-emphasizing inclusive participation, networked governance, and bottom-up accountability-can offer a context-specific and sustainable framework for conflict management in fragile borderland contexts.
A qualitative case study design was employed, with data collected from 35 community members and 30 security officials in Brikama LGA and neighbouring border areas through interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis. Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step thematic framework, supported by NVivo 15, guided the analysis.
Findings indicate that NPG enhances conflict management by integrating indigenous mechanisms, such as joking relationships (sanankuyaa, Jola-Fula-Serer), which foster cohesion, humour, and respect. Cross-border collaboration through joint patrols, training, and harmonized protocols builds trust and strengthens coordination among stakeholders. Community perceptions highlight that participatory dialogue, peace education, and cultural practices reinforce inter-ethnic cohesion, reconciliation, and shared identity. Strategies to strengthen NPG include improved infrastructure, secure communication, early warning systems, and livelihood initiatives such as cross-border markets and youth/women empowerment. Multi-level adaptive governance and hybrid councils further institutionalize inclusive conflict transformation. Despite these benefits, challenges persist, including complex socio-political dynamics, capacity gaps among traditional leaders, and uneven resource distribution, which limits the full realization of NPG’s potential.
This study is motivated by a critical research gap while prior research has examined conflict in the Senegambia borderlands; limited attention has been given to how a governance framework like NPG can operationalize local cultural mechanisms for sustainable conflict transformation. Addressing this gap can provide evidence-based strategies for policymakers, practitioners, and community actors to enhance peacebuilding in fragile border contexts.

New Public Governance, conflict management, border communities

1. Abbink, J. (2003). Ethiopia–Eritrea: Proxy wars and prospects of peace in the Horn of Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 21(3), 407–426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adegbonmire, J. (2015). Conflict situations and ways to resolve conflicts. African Union Commission, Hybrid Court & Transitional Justice, South Sudan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amer, R. (2016). The conflict management framework of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In Conflict management and dispute settlement in East Asia (pp. 39–62). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bartos, O. J., & Wehr, P. (2002). Using conflict theory. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bayo, K. M. (1977). Mass orientations and regional integration: Environmental variations in Gambian orientations towards Senegambia (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bradley, M., & Erdilmen, M. (2023). Is the International Organization for Migration legitimate? Rights-talk, protection commitments and the legitimation of IOM. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(9), 2332–2354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Callahan, K. (2006). Elements of effective governance: Measurement, accountability and participation. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chareonwongsak, K. (2018). ASEAN’s limitations in conflict resolution. In International Security in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 85–98). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Evans, M., & Ray, C. (2013). Uncertain ground: The Gambia and the Casamance conflict. In C. Perfect (Ed.), State and society in The Gambia since independence (pp. 247–287). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ghebretekle, T. B., & Rammala, M. (2018). Traditional African conflict resolution: The case of South Africa and Ethiopia. Mizan Law Review, 12(2), 325–347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gilbert, C., & Pasque, P. A. (2023). Defining culturally responsive research: Learnings and tensions in minoritized researcher perspectives. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hamad, J. R. J., Hanafiah, M. M., & Yaakob, W. Z. W. (2017). Water resources management in Libya: Challenges and future prospects. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 1(2), 2–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Johnson, F. I., Laing, R., Bjeirmi, B., & Leon, M. (2023). The impacts of multi-stakeholders collaboration on management and mitigation of oil pipeline disasters in Nigeria. AIMS Environmental Science, 10(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krogh, A. H., & Triantafillou, P. (2024). Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model. Public Management Review, 26(10), 3040–3056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Korf, B., & Emmers, R. (2019). Border governance and conflict management in Africa. Conflict, Security & Development, 19(4), 293–311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mkutu, K. A. (2008). Uganda: Pastoral conflict and gender relations. Review of African Political Economy, 35(116), 237–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nadelmann, E., & Andreas, P. (2006). Policing the globe: Criminalization and crime control in international relations. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Niang, A. (2013). The (in)commodities of laissez-faire integration: Trade and mobility in a cross-border market. African Studies, 72(1), 41–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nugent, P. (2007). Cyclical history in the Gambia/Casamance borderlands: Refugee settlement and Islam from 1880 to the present. The Journal of African History, 48(2), 221–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. O’Flynn, I. (2007). Divided societies and deliberative democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 731–751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Oishi, S., & Gilbert, E. A. (2016). Current and future directions in culture and happiness research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 54–58.s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction: The New Public Governance – A suitable case for treatment. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The New Public Governance? (pp. 17–32). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Okpara, U. T., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., & Bila, M. D. (2015). Conflicts about water in Lake Chad: Are environmental, vulnerability and security issues linked? Progress in Development Studies, 15(4), 308–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rosenbloom, D. H., & Chanin, J. (2017). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rubenstein, R. E. (2011). Reasons to kill: Why Americans choose war. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sawaneh, B. (2021). Interrogating the relevance of New Public Management and New Public Governance paradigms to public service delivery in The Gambia. Ilorin Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 23(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Schlager, E., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Left high and dry? Climate change, common-pool resource theory, and the adaptability of western water compacts. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 461–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing public administration (9th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sone, P. M. (2016). Relevance of traditional methods of conflict resolution in the Justice Systems in Africa. Africa Insight, 46(3), 51–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Xu, R., Sun, Q., & Si, W. (2015). The third wave of public administration: The New Public Governance. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 11–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zartman, I. W. (2018). Soft power and traditional African conflict management. In Stability and security in Africa: The role of hard and soft power (p. 21). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria