Video-Based Learning for Higher Education 5.0 Exposure and Immersion

The Higher Education 5.0 initiative represents a shift in tertiary education, seeking to align academic instructions with the realities students will encounter in their future workplaces. The transformations brought about by Industry 4.0 have fundamentally altered workplace training paradigms. Tertiary students, as tomorrow’s workforce, are increasingly encountering educational technologies characteristic of Higher Education 5.0, with video-based learning (VBL) emerging as a particularly significant innovation. As a cornerstone of the flipped classroom model, VBL has become instrumental in facilitating blended pedagogical approaches across universities and tertiary institutions. Throughout the ASEAN region, this technology is proving transformative for both learners and instructors, enabling round-the-clock access to educational content and supporting truly flexible learning environments. Concise, engaging, and informative video content is rapidly becoming the defining medium for knowledge transmission within the Higher Education 5.0 paradigm. This empirical investigation builds upon earlier efforts to develop and disseminate explainer video content designed for broader, more accessible teaching approaches that emphasise fundamental concepts which learners subsequently develop independently. Contemporary VBL has evolved beyond its origins as an informal learning tool to become a mainstream pedagogical resource spanning both academic and corporate educational contexts.

Video-based Learning, exposure, immersion, flipped classroom

1. Adnan, A. H. M. (2013a). Language use and identity construction in a ‘micro-community’ of Malay undergraduates. In R. Machart, C. B. Lim, S. N. Lim, & E. Yamato (eds.), Intersecting Identities and Interculturality: Discourse and Practice (pp. 91-110). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adnan, A. H. M. (2013b). Language use and workplace participation in the identity construction of Bumiputera Malay undergraduates in Malaysia (unpublished Doctor of Philosophy thesis). University of Auckland, New Zealand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adnan, A. H. M., & Zamari, Z. M. (2012a). “I am a Techno-Rebel!” Malaysian Academics & their Personal Experiences of Progressing into e-Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 61-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adnan, A. H. M., & Zamari, Z. M. (2012b). Computer-Aided Self-Access Language Learning: Views of Indonesian, Malaysian & New Zealand Practitioners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 49-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adnan, A. H. M., Ahmad, M. K., Yusof, A. A., Mohd Kamal, M. A., & Mustafa Kamal, N. N. (2019). English Language Simulations Augmented with 360-degrees spherical videos (ELSA 360°- Videos): ‘Virtual Reality’ real life learning! In MNNF Publisher (Ed.), Leading Towards Creativity & Innovation (Series 1) (pp. 82.88). MNNF Publisher. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmad, M. K., Adnan, A. H. M., Azamri, N. M., Idris, K. B., Norafand, N. N., & Ishak, N. I. (2019). Education 4.0 technologies for English language teaching and learning in the Malaysian context. Paper presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series 2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ahmad, M. K., Adnan, A. H. M., Yusof, A. A., Mohd Kamal, M. A., & Mustafa Kamal, N. N. (2019). Using new technologies to teach English in Malaysia - issues and challenges. In MNNF Network (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series 1/2019 (pp. 203-207). MNNF Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Arlington, TX: ISTE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipping for mastery. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 24-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chang, W. H., Yang, J. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2011). A keyword-based video summarization learning platform with multimodal surrogates. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 37-41). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chenail, R. J. (2011). YouTube as a qualitative research asset: Reviewing user generated videos as learning resources. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 229-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cuesta Medina, L. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 42-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped Classrooms: A Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 144-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Donkor, F. (2011). Assessment of learner acceptance and satisfaction with video-based instructional materials for teaching practical skills at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5), 74-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Egbert, J., Herman, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Flipped instruction in English language teacher education: A design-based study in a complex, open-ended learning environment. TESL-EJ, 19(2), n2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1), 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Krogstie, J. (2016). Exploring the relationship between video lecture usage patterns and students' attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1259- 1275. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 81-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby. G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 121-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kanuka, H. (2007). A principled approach to facilitating distance education: The Internet, higher education and higher levels of learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 17(2), 70-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kanuka, H., & Rourke, L. (2013). Using Blended Learning Strategies to Address Teaching Development Needs: How Does Canada Compare? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(3), 19-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kirkgoz, Y. (2011). A Blended Learning Study on Implementing Video Recorded Speaking Tasks in Task-Based Classroom Instruction. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McLaughlin, J., Roth, M., Glatt, D., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., & Mumper, R. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the Classroom to Improve Student Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Moffett, J., & Mill, A. (2014). Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 415-425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2017). Learning English (and Arabic) in Malaysian Islamic Schools: Language use and the construction of identities. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 407-420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2018). Industry 4.0 skill sets, higher-order thinking skills and gamification: Lessons from ‘Potentia Project’, Malaysia (Plenary Panel Presentation). Proceedings from TING X 2018: The Tenth National Meeting of Teachers (Temu Ilmiah Nasional Guru) ‘Innovation in Education for Indonesia 4.0’. Universitas Terbuka Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2019). Education 4.0 technologies, Industry 4.0 skills and the critical roles of inventors, innovators and developers. [Plenary] Paper presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series 2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mohd Adnan, A. H., Ya Shak, M. S., Karim, R. A., Tahir, M. H. M., & Shah, D. S. M. (2020). 360-degree videos, VR experiences and the application of Education 4.0 technologies in Malaysia for exposure and immersion. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. Journal, 5(1), 373-381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mohd Kamal, M. A., Adnan, A. H. M., Mustafa Kamal, N. N., Ahmad, M. K., & Yusof, A. A. (2019). 60 seconds ‘Video-based Learning’ to facilitate Flipped Classrooms and Blended Learning at a Malaysian university. In MNNF Network (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series 1/2019 (pp. 118-127). MNNF Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mohd, K. N., Adnan, A. H. M., Yusof, A. A., Ahmad, M. K., & Mohd Kamal, M. A. (2019). Teaching Arabic language to Malaysian university students using education technologies based on Education 4.0 principles. Paper presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series 2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mustafa Kamal, N. N., Adnan, A. H. M., Yusof, A. A., Ahmad, M. K., & Mohd Kamal, M. A. (2019). ‘Immersive Interactive Educational Experiences’ – adopting Education 5.0, Industry 4.0 learning technologies for Malaysian universities. In MNNF Network (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series 1/2019 (pp. 190-196). MNNF Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pang, Y. (2010). Improving hybrid learning of physical education by video review. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 230-239). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Qiao, Q., & Beling, P. A. (2011). Classroom video assessment and retrieval via multiple instance learning. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 272-279). Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Reynard, R. (2007). Hybrid Learning: Challenges for teachers. https://thejournal.com/ articles/2007/05/17/hybrid-learning-challenges-for-teachers.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Santikarn, B., & Wichadee, S. (2018). Flipping the Classroom for English Language Learners: A Study of Learning Performance and Perceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(09), 123-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shih, R. C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language student. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883-897. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Smyth, R. (2011). Enhancing learner–learner interaction using video communications in higher education: Implications from theorising about a new model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 113-127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sojayapan, C., & Khlaisang, J. (2018). The effect of a flipped classroom with online group investigation on students' team learning ability. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences (in press). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V. & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58, 19-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Van Zanten, R., Somogyi, S. & Curro, G. (2012). Purpose and preference in educational podcasting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 130-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. Int. J. Adv. Life Sci, 6(3/4), 122-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yusof, A. A., Adnan, A. H. M., Mustafa Kamal, N. N., Mohd Kamal, M. A., & Ahmad, M. K. (2019). Education 4.0 immersive learning with Spherical Videos (360°) and Virtual Reality (VR) experiences. Paper presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series 2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zamari, Z. M., & Adnan, A. H. M. (2011). Fusing CALL with SALL: The Good English Language Learner community on Facebook as a case in point. English Language Journal (UPSI Sultan Idris Education University), 4, 126-146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study