Student Engagement in Technology- Enhanced Social Studies Instruction among Grade 10 Students in Selected Public Secondary Schools in District of Ilog I: A Descriptive Study

Integrating technology into Social Studies is seen as key to enhancing student learning and engagement, yet its impact on different engagement dimensions in developing regions is underexplored. This study investigated the level of student engagement in technology- enhanced Social Studies instruction and its relationship with the extent of technology integration among Grade 10 students in the District of Ilog I, Negros Occidental. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive- correlational research design, data were gathered from 158 students across two public secondary schools using a researcher- made Likert- scale questionnaire. The findings revealed an overall “High” level of student engagement, with cognitive and social dimensions rated as High, while behavioral and emotional engagement remained “Moderate”. Technology integration was rated at an “Advanced” level, primarily driven by the use of instructional platforms and digital learning resources. Correlation analysis using Pearson’s indicated a strong positive and statistically significant relationship between technology integration and student engagement, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The study concludes that while advanced technology integration significantly boosts cognitive and social involvement, pedagogical strategies must be further refined to improve behavioral participation and emotional connection. Recommendations include providing continuous professional development for teachers and enhancing digital infrastructure to support more transformative and student- centered learning experiences.

Student Engagement, Technology Integration, Social Studies

1. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educationl technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020 (1), 1-14. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dede, C. (2014). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning. In H. F. Silver & J. A. Strong (Eds), Deeper Learning: Beyond 21st century skills (pp. 59- 73). Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self- determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227- 268. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PL1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2022). Basic education development plan 2030. Retrieved from: https://www.deped.gov.ph⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gupta, A., (2023). Spearman’s Rank Correlation: The Definitive Guide to Understand. Retrieved from: https://www.simplelearn.com/tutorials/statistics-tutorial/spearmans-rank-correlation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in health Sciences Education. 15 (5), 625- 632. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards. Retrieved from: https://www.socialstudies.org⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Retrieved from: http://hippasus.com⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–28. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0⁠ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A.., & Furrer, C. J. (2008). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68 (3), 493- 525. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.117/0013164407310131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical analysis (5th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Drama to Cultural Identity of Students in One Private School
• Children’s Vulnerability in Coastal Slums during Cyclone: A Case Study of Puri Municipality Area
• Mitigating Youth Restiveness Through Social Studies Education: Implications for Institutional Stability, Civic Responsibility, and Student Empowerment in Nigeria
• Students’ Awareness of Sexual Harassment Forms at Campus II, University of Labor and Social Affairs
• Influence of Social Studies Curriculum Content on Youth Restiveness and Civic Responsibility Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria