Advantages of Cemented Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) Acetabular Components Compared with Uncemented Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular constructs reduce dislocation risk in total hip arthroplasty (THA) by increasing effective femoral head size (28-44mm) and jump distance (32-38mm vs 14mm conventional), achieving 71-85% relative risk reduction[7,8]. While uncemented press-fit shells remain standard (92% market share), cemented MDM demonstrates equivalent 10-year survivorship with superior early stability[9,2].
Methods: Systematic synthesis of biomechanical principles (finite element analysis, RSA migration studies), cement mantle mechanics, dual-mobility kinematics, and meta-analysis of 18,472 THA cases (3,452 cemented DM)[10,11].
Results: Cemented MDM provides: (1) immediate fixation independent of bone quality (T-score < -2.5) with 100% 90-day stability[2]; (2) micromotion <50μm vs 150-300μm uncemented at 6 weeks[10]; (3) cup orientation precision ±3° maximizing jump distance[12]; (4) 96% fracture risk reduction eliminating impaction forces[13]; (5) 92% 5-year survival in Paprosky 2-3B defects[14]; (6) 73% lower modular junction corrosion (serum Co/Cr)[15].
Conclusion: Cemented MDM optimal for instability-prone patients (age >75, neuromuscular disease, BMI >35, revision). Level I trials needed[7,8].

ARTHROPLASTY

1. Butler JT, et al. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Wilson JM, et al. Bone Joint J. 2024;106-B:352-358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Persico I, et al. J Pers Med. 2023;13:81 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Tabata T, et al. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. García-Rey E, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1471-1479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bistolfi A, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Abdelaziz H, et al. Egypt Orthop J. 2019;54:168-173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Rickman M, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1597-1603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moskal JT, et al. JAAOS. 2015;23:135-147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. de Martino I, et al. World J Orthop. 2014;5:180-187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Philippot R, et al. Int Orthop. 2014;38:541-546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Assiotis A, et al. J Orthop Res. 2015;33:1125-1133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Abdel MP, et al. Hip Pelvis. 2016;28:195-206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. D’Angelo F, et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:81-86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hodgkinson JP, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:105-120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Measuring Waste of Patient Time in Health Care at Non-Digitized Hospital: An Observational Study in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
• Reaffirming Clinical Confidence in Atorvastatin Therapy: A Digital Outreach Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India
• Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Response in a Patient with Hypothyroidism: A Case Report
• Eranda (Ricinus Communis) In Gridhrasi (Sciatica): Classical Rationale, Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence- A Narrative Literature Review
• Magnetotherapy in Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives – A Review