Psychosocio-Spiritual Factors of Marital Satisfaction among Couples in the Archdiocese of Nairobi, Kenya

Authors

Lillian Wairimu Maina

Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Nairobi (Kenya)

Joyzy Pius Egunjobi

Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Nairobi (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000149

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 1588-1597

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-06

Accepted: 2026-05-11

Published: 2026-06-04

Abstract

Marital satisfaction is a crucial condition for providing a secure environment for the family, emotional health, and overall functioning of family relationships. In religious groups, the marital relationship is usually influenced by psychological, social, and spiritual factors. This research attempted to study the psychosocial-spiritual factors that influence marital satisfaction in the parish families in the Archdiocese of Nairobi, Kenya. The specific psychosocial-spiritual factors studied in marital satisfaction included communication, emotional support, family support, socioeconomic problems, conflict resolution, and spiritual exercises. The research used a qualitative descriptive design and was held in selected parishes in the Archdiocese of Nairobi, Kenya. The respondents were Catholic married couples. The samples were obtained using purposive sampling, and a total of twenty couples (forty individual respondents) participated. Open-ended questionnaires were used to collect data. The results revealed that effective communication, emotional support, and effective solutions to conflicts were vital in ensuring marital satisfaction, providing trust, intimacy, and interdependence in social relationships. The respondents experienced inefficient communications at times due to stronger emotional reactions, more financial than time resources, and more burdens of emotional strain. The findings further revealed that the family members of the couples became a pillar of emotional and financial support, especially in times of economic distress, experienced a lot of interference most of the time, and were not seen as very beneficial most of the time. The general spiritual aspect found to be relevant in marital satisfaction was the shared spiritual exercises like prayer and participation in church activities, as they enhanced marital bonding, aided in overcoming difficulties, and strengthened commitment. Based on the findings, marital satisfaction appeared to be a result of the interaction of psychological competence, social environment, and spiritual resources.

Keywords

Marital satisfaction, psychosocial factors, spirituality, communication

Downloads

References

1. Abreu Afonso, J., Ramos, M. M., Queiroz Garcia, I., & Leal, I. (2022). How couples’ relationship lasts over time? A model for marital satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 131(2), 921–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211000651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, S. (2024). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences. Advanced Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alfawair, S., & Okasha, N. (2023). Marriage and emotional well being in contemporary society. Journal of Family and Social Psychology, 12(1), 34–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Azarnik, A., Carasso, R., & Segel Karpas, D. (2024). Psychological competencies and marital satisfaction: A review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Marital Studies, 10(3), 145–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayre, C., & McCaffery, K. (2022). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: A practical guide. Qualitative Health Research, 32(7), 1059–1070. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baloyi, G. T. (2022). Marriage and culture within African indigenous contexts: Insights and challenges. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412 4265/10113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bisht, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: Methodological perspectives. Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brigoli, F., & Sandoval, R. (2023). Marital satisfaction and mental health outcomes: Integrating psychological and social perspectives. Journal of Family Psychology, 38(4), 460–475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ghioto, L. (2024). Catholic teachings on marriage: Sacrament and spirituality in family life. Catholic Theology Review, 9(1), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grundström, H., Larsson, M., & Olsson, E. (2021). Marriage, social identity, and family cohesion: Cross cultural perspectives. Family Relations, 70(5), 1185–1202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mahoney, A., & Boyatzis, C. J. (2008). Sanctification of marriage and spiritual intimacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893 3200.22.4.604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mary Omoboye, M., Eneh, N. E., & Titor Addingi, M. C. (2024). Communication patterns and marital satisfaction: English discourse in family counseling. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1883–1891. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Okonkwo, K. D. (2024). Attachment styles and marital stability: A psychological framework. American Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajp.2474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pargament, K. I. (2001). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sagone, E., & De Caroli, M. E. (2023). Attachment and adult relational patterns: Lifespan evidence. Journal of Relationship Research, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sorokowski, P., Kowal, M., & Sorokowska, A. (2019). Religious affiliation and marital satisfaction: Commonalities among Christians, Muslims, and atheists. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02798 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tenny, S., & Brannan, A. (2022). Qualitative descriptive research design: Applications and contemporary considerations. Research Methods Quarterly, 8(1), 50–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhou, L. (2025). Societal context and marital satisfaction: Influence of social pressures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(4), 772–790. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles