Level of Access and Benefit Sharing with Respect to Indigenous Medicinal Knowledge in Baringo County, Kenya

This study assessed the level of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) with respect to indigenous medicinal knowledge (IMK) in Baringo County, Kenya. This study was grounded on two theories; Legal pluralism and Equitable benefit sharing/distributive justice theory. This study adopted an exploratory research design. The study employed the use of both primary and secondary sources of data collection. Primary data was gathered through Key Informant Interviews (KII) while secondary data was obtained through documentary reviews. The target population for this study comprised traditional healers, elders, local community, county government officials, and representatives from relevant institutions and organizations that are involved in ABS and the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol. This study targeted a total of 50 respondents. Qualitative data was analyzed through thematic content analysis, which involved transcription, coding, and categorization of the interview data. The patterns and themes that emerged in relation to the status of domestication of the Nagoya Protocol in Kenya, ABS and the legal and institutional gaps were interpreted. The study found mixed perceptions of ABS in Baringo County, with low awareness of the Nagoya Protocol and Kenya’s ABS Regulations (2014) limiting participation and trust. ABS has minimally improved IMK documentation or commercialization, with benefits often captured by intermediaries due to weak enforcement. Key barriers include low literacy, complex licensing, and weak institutional support, requiring capacity building and simplified systems.

Nagoya Protocol; Indigenous Medicinal Knowledge (IMK), Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS)

1. African Union. (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want. African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AUC & UNEP. (2019). Africa environment outlook 2: Our environment, our health. African Union Commission & United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bagley, M. A., & Rai, A. K. (2014). The Nagoya Protocol and access and benefit sharing: Implications for biodiversity governance. Journal of Environmental Law, 26(2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bavikatte, K., & Robinson, D. (2017). Community stewardship of biocultural heritage. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bosselmann, K. (2008). The principle of sustainability. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Byakika, S., et al. (2017). Traditional knowledge and medicinal plant use in Uganda’s Rwenzori region. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 13(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. CBD. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. CBD. (2011). Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chennells, R. (2012). Access and benefit sharing in South Africa. Journal of Law, Science & Policy, 8(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chennells, R. (2013). Customary law and biodiversity governance in Africa. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 21(2), 201–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chigona, W. (2015). Traditional knowledge protection in Africa. African Journal of Legal Studies, 8(3), 155–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Coolsaet, B. (2020). Transformative ABS and justice in biodiversity governance. Ecological Economics, 167, 106445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. De Beer, J., & Wynberg, R. (2006). Bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing in Africa. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. De Jonge, B. (2019). Access and benefit-sharing and customary law. Law and Development Review, 12(2), 345–370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dutfield, G. (2004). Intellectual property, biogenetic resources and traditional knowledge. Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. EAC Secretariat. (2020). East African Community biodiversity and environmental report. EAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Egbuta, J., et al. (2019). ABS and traditional knowledge in Nigeria’s Niger Delta. African Studies Review, 62(3), 89–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Government of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Government of Kenya. (2014). Ratification of Nagoya Protocol. Ministry of Environment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kamau, E. C., Fedder, B., & Winter, G. (2010). The Nagoya Protocol and developing countries. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 6(3), 221–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kamau, E. C., Winter, G., & Stoll, P. (2015). Research and policy challenges in ABS implementation. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kariuki, J., & Birner, R. (2020). Gender and natural resource governance in Kenya. World Development, 130, 104930. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Koech, E., et al. (2019). Medicinal plant use in Baringo County. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 240, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Laird, S. A., et al. (2010). Biodiversity and traditional knowledge: Equitable benefit-sharing. Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and custom in savage society. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mgboeji, S. (2006). Traditional knowledge protection in Africa. Journal of African Law, 50(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2019). National biodiversity strategy and action plan (2019–2030). Government of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Moore, S. F. (1973). Law and social change. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719–746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Morgera, E. (2018). Biodiversity, communities and intellectual property. Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., & Buck, M. (2015). Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., & Buck, M. (2020). ABS governance and justice. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mutta, D. (2019). Devolution and environmental governance in Kenya. African Journal of Governance, 10(2), 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mutta, D. (2020). ABS implementation challenges in Kenya. Journal of Environmental Policy, 15(3), 233–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nchanji, E., & Tchoundjeu, Z. (2016). ABS and customary law in Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 64, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. NEMA. (2018). Annual environmental report. National Environment Management Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Oguamanam, C. (2015). International law and indigenous knowledge. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ogumanam, C. (2018). Traditional knowledge and legal protection. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 21(4), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Osei-Tutu, E., et al. (2018). Community intellectual property rights in Ghana. African Journal of Intellectual Property, 5(2), 67–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. OAU. (2000). African model law for protection of local communities. Organization of African Unity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Osei-Tutu, E., et al. (2018). Community intellectual property systems in Ghana. African Journal of IP Law, 5(2), 67–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Posey, D. A. (1998). Traditional knowledge and biodiversity conservation. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Robinson, D. (2010). Biopiracy and indigenous knowledge. Environmental Law Review, 12(2), 123–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Santos, B. de S. (1987). Law: A map of misreading. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3), 279–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Shikongo, E. (2015). Community conservancies and biodiversity in Namibia. Namibian Journal of Environment, 3(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 375–411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ten Kate, K., & Laird, S. A. (2002). The commercial use of biodiversity. Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. UN. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. WIPO. (2020). Traditional knowledge and genetic resources report. World Intellectual Property Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Wynberg, R., & Laird, S. (2007). Biodiversity and ABS in Africa. Development Southern Africa, 24(5), 609–623. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Wynberg, R., Schroeder, D., & Chennells, R. (2018). Indigenous knowledge and bioprospecting. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Wynberg, R., et al. (2009). ABS implementation challenges in Africa. Development Southern Africa, 26(4), 561–576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Wynberg, R., et al. (2012). Biodiversity governance and ABS in Africa. Journal of Environmental Law, 24(2), 233–256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Arts and Culture and International Relations in Nigeria