“Balancing Effective Crime Investigation and Observance of Custodial Rights: A Study of Law Enforcement Officers in the 5th District of Pangasinan”

This study examines the balance between effective crime investigation and the observance of custodial rights within the criminal justice system. It focuses on how law enforcement officers conduct investigation while ensuring the constitutional rights of suspects are protected during arrest, detention and interrogation. The research aims to determine the challenges encountered by the investigators in maintaining investigative efficiency without violating legal and human rights standards. Specifically, it explores the level of awareness and compliance of investigators regarding custodial rights, the common issues arising during custodial investigations and the impact of rights observance on the integrity of criminal cases.
A descriptive research was utilized in this study, involving respondents from law enforcement agencies and individuals knowledgeable in criminal investigation procedures. Data were gathered through survey, interviews and related legal documents. The findings revealed that while investigators recognize the importance of custodial rights, challenges such as pressure to solve cases quickly, lack of resources and limited training sometimes affect proper compliance. The study also found that respecting custodial rights strengthens the credibility of evidence, prevents legal complications and promotes public trust in the justice system.
The study concludes that balancing crime investigation with the observance of custodial rights is essential in achieving justice and protecting individual freedoms. It recommends continuous training for investigators, stricter implementation of legal procedures and strengthened monitoring mechanisms to ensure that investigations remain lawful, ethical and effective.

Crime Investigation, Custodial Rights, Law Enforcement, Human Rights, Criminal Justice

1. Bautista, A. (2018). Criminal procedure in the Philippines. Rex Book Store. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cruz, M. (2021). Awareness of Custodial Rights among Detainees in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. De Leon, R. (2019). Compliance with Custodial Investigation Procedures. Journal of Philippine Law Enforcement, 10(2), 23-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gardner, T. J., & Anderson, T. M. (2015) Criminal Evidence: Principles and Cases (9th ed.0. Cengage Learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem oriented Policing. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hess, K. M., & Orthmann, C.H. (2017). Criminal Investigation (11th ed.). Cengage Learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Innes, M. (2013). Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R.A., Redlich, A. D. (2010) Police Induced Confessions. Law and Human behavior, 34(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9186-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. LaFave, W. R., Israel, J.H., King, N. J., & Kerr, O. S. (2020). Criminal Procedure (6th ed.). West Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Leao, R.A. (2008). Police interrogation and American Justice. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Interview and Interrogation Methods. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Osterburg, J. W., & Ward, R. H. (2014). Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past (7th ed.). Anderson Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Reiner, R. (2010). The Politics of the Police (4th ed.) Oxford University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Santos, L. (2020). Procedures Violations and Case outcomes in the Philippines Cirt. Asian Journal of Criminology, 12(2), 88-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Simon, D. (2012). In doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice Process. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Skolnick, J.H., & Fyfw, J. J. (1993). Above the law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 1987 Philippine Constitution. (1987) Article III, Section 12. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Republic Act No. 7438. (1992). An Act defining certain rights of persons arrested, detained or under custodial investigation and providing penalties for violations thereof. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Republic Act No. 9745. (2009). Anti-Torture Act of 2009.Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2000). People of the Philippines v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 122485, February 1,1999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2014). People of the Philippines v. Malana, G.R. no. 233737, December 10,2014. https://philarchive.org/archive/REFFAR https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379567585_RIGHTS_TO_AN_ACCUSED_PERSON_UNDER_JUDICIAL_AND_POLICE_CUSTODY_A_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_INDIAN_LAWS_WITH_SPECIAL_REFERENCE_TO_CUSTODIAL_VIOLENCE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar