Utilization of Artificial Intelligence and Perceived Programming Skills of Third Year Information Technology Students at Quezon City University

This study examined the perceived influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) utilization on the programming skills of third-year Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) students at Quezon City University. Specifically, the study focused on students’ self-reported perceptions regarding coding speed, debugging accuracy, coding productivity, learning effectiveness, and the perceived positive and negative influences of AI-assisted programming tools. A quantitative descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 284 purposively selected third-year BSIT students during Academic Year 2025–2026. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire administered through Google Forms. The instrument underwent expert validation and pilot testing prior to the actual conduct of the study, yielding acceptable reliability coefficients using Cronbach’s alpha. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage distribution, and weighted mean were utilized, while Spearman’s rho and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used to determine significant relationships and differences among variables. The findings revealed that respondents generally agreed that they possess positive programming-related behaviors and experiences in terms of coding speed, debugging accuracy, coding productivity, and learning effectiveness. Respondents also strongly agreed that AI tools help them understand programming concepts, improve debugging accuracy, and support problem-solving strategies. However, they likewise agreed that excessive AI utilization may contribute to overdependence, reduced independent problem-solving, decreased manual coding practice, and inaccurate reliance on AI-generated outputs. Despite these perceptions, Spearman’s rho analysis showed no statistically significant relationship between AI utilization and perceived programming skills (rs = 0.074, p = 0.211). The findings suggest that while students perceive AI tools as beneficial in supporting programming-related learning experiences, such perceptions do not necessarily indicate measurable improvements in actual programming competence. The study recommends the responsible and balanced integration of AI tools in programming education while encouraging independent coding practice, critical thinking, and problem-solving activities.

Artificial Intelligence, Perceived Programming Skills, IT Students, AI-Assisted Learning, Programming Education

1. Abubakar, S., Jeilani, A., & Yusuf, M. (2025). The role of over-reliance on AI in the negative consequences of student learning: The moderating effects of ethical concerns and institutional policies. *Cogent Education, 12*(1). [https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2591503](https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2591503) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alkhawaja, L., et al. (2025). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on students’ skills for sustainable development in education. *Frontiers in Education*. [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1691148](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1691148) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arum, R., Calderon Leon, M., Li, X., & Lopes, J. (2025). ChatGPT early adoption in higher education: Variation in student usage, instructional support, and educational equity. *AERA Open*. [https://journals.sagepub.com/search?SeriesKey=eroa&AllField=ChatGPT+Early+Adoption+in+Higher+Education](https://journals.sagepub.com/search?SeriesKey=eroa&AllField=ChatGPT+Early+Adoption+in+Higher+Education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chaudhary, A. A., Arif, S., Calimlim, R. J. F., Khan, S. Z., & Sadia, A. (2024). The impact of AI-powered educational tools on student engagement and learning outcomes at higher education level. *International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences*. [https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/1027](https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/1027) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Digital Education Council. (2024). *How students use AI: The evolving relationship between AI and higher education*. [https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/how-students-use-ai-the-evolving-relationship-between-ai-and-higher-education](https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/how-students-use-ai-the-evolving-relationship-between-ai-and-higher-education) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Diversitas Journal. (2026). *Student-reported cognitive effects of artificial intelligence (AI) use in Philippine classrooms: An empirical integrative review*. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400923078](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400923078) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., & Viiri, J. (2019). Computational thinking in programming with Scratch in primary schools: A systematic review. *Computer Applications in Engineering Education*. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22255](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22255) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guerra, A. (2023). *The future benefits of artificial intelligence for students*. URBE University. [https://urbeuniversity.edu/blog/the-future-benefits-of-artificial-intelligence-for-students](https://urbeuniversity.edu/blog/the-future-benefits-of-artificial-intelligence-for-students [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Güner, H., & Er, E. (2025). AI in the classroom: Exploring students’ interaction with ChatGPT in programming learning. *Education and Information Technologies*. [https://link.springer.com/search?query=AI+in+the+classroom+Exploring+students+interaction+with+ChatGPT+in+programming+learning](https://link.springer.com/search?query=AI+in+the+classroom+Exploring+students+interaction+with+ChatGPT+in+programming+learning) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Handur, V., Kalwad, P. D., Patil, M. S., Garagad, V. G., Yeligar, N., & Pattar, P. (2016). Integrating class and laboratory with hands-on programming: Its benefits and challenges. In *2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE)*. [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8049075](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8049075) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jing, Y., Wang, H., Chen, X., et al. (2024). What factors will affect the effectiveness of using ChatGPT to solve programming problems? A quasi-experimental study. *Humanities and Social Sciences Communications*. [https://www.nature.com/search?q=What%20factors%20will%20affect%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20using%20ChatGPT%20to%20solve%20programming%20problems](https://www.nature.com/search?q=What%20factors%20will%20affect%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20using%20ChatGPT%20to%20solve%20programming%20problems) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. *Learning and Individual Differences, 103*. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608023000195](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608023000195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Levin, B. A., Piskunov, A. A., Poliakov, V. Y., & Savin, A. V. (2022). Artificial intelligence in engineering education. *Higher Education in Russia*. [https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3871](https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3871) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mathew, R., Malik, S. I., & Tawafak, R. M. (2019). Teaching problem solving skills using an educational game in a computer programming course. *Informatics in Education*. [https://infedu.vu.lt/journal/INFEDU/article/18/info](https://infedu.vu.lt/journal/INFEDU/article/18/info [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mellado, R., & Cubillos, C. (2025). Can generative artificial intelligence outperform self-instructional learning in computer programming? *Applied Sciences, 15*(11), 5867. [https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115867](https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115867) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Montejo, D. C., et al. (2026). Evaluating the impact of AI-powered tools on programming skills development among IT students. *Journal of Science*. [https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en/article/view/3519](https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/soci-en/article/view/3519) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT integration in higher education for personalized learning, academic writing, and coding tasks: A systematic review. *Computers*. [https://www.mdpi.com/search?q=ChatGPT+Integration+in+Higher+Education+for+Personalized+Learning](https://www.mdpi.com/search?q=ChatGPT+Integration+in+Higher+Education+for+Personalized+Learning) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Puryear, B., & Sprint, G. (2022). GitHub Copilot in the classroom: Learning to code with AI assistance. In *Proceedings of the Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges Northwestern Conference* (pp. 37–44). Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Qureshi, B. (2023). Exploring the use of ChatGPT as a tool for learning and assessment in undergraduate computer science curriculum: Opportunities and challenges. *arXiv*. [https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Exploring+the+Use+of+ChatGPT+as+a+Tool+for+Learning+and+Assessment&searchtype=all](https://arxiv.org/search/?query=Exploring+the+Use+of+ChatGPT+as+a+Tool+for+Learning+and+Assessment&searchtype=all) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Scholl, A., & Kiesler, N. (2024). How novice programmers use and experience ChatGPT when solving programming exercises in an introductory course. *arXiv*. [https://arxiv.org/search/?query=How+Novice+Programmers+Use+and+Experience+ChatGPT&searchtype=all](https://arxiv.org/search/?query=How+Novice+Programmers+Use+and+Experience+ChatGPT&searchtype=all) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. *International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18*(1). [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8545464/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8545464/) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Silva, C. A. G. Da, Ramos, F. N., Moraes, R. V. De, & Santos, E. L. Dos. (2024). ChatGPT: Challenges and benefits in software programming for higher education. *Sustainability, 16*(3), 1245. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031245](https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031245) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tarray, K., Oreta, M. C., Espiritu, M., & Alfarero, R. (2025). Impacts of artificial intelligence technology on student learning of selected college students in Quezon. *Philippine E-Journals*. [https://www.ejournals.ph/article.php?id=28161](https://www.ejournals.ph/article.php?id=28161) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. *Education Sciences, 15*(3), 343. [https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/3/343](https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/3/343) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2023). Do AI chatbots improve students’ learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. *British Journal of Educational Technology*. [https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334](https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. *Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4*. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000267](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000267) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet