Role of the Barangay Justice System in Reducing Case Court Congestion

Court congestion is a reality in the world. Many cases pile up in the courts and as a result, people face delays in the solution of disputes. Various reasons have been attributed to slow processing of cases by the courts. Unfortunately, it affects the ability of courts to deliver timely resolutions. It affects public confidence in the justice delivery system. As the number of cases continues to grow traditional judicial systems are also straining to keep up, resulting in extended delays and limited access to justice for a lot of individuals.
Guatemala along with other countries have a situation where the courts are congested with cases. Consequently, this has led to long delays in the issuance of court rulings, which slows down and at times renders ineffective access to justice, in this setting, arbitration appears as an alternative means of settling conflicts that provides a promising and effective response to this judicial congestion (Salazar 2024).
In Kenya, the Alternative Justice Systems (AJS) Policy recognizes traditional, informal, and community justice mechanisms as part of the country's broader legal framework. A study by the Judiciary of Kenya (2020), showed that AJS contributes significantly to case resolution in rural and marginalized areas. It highlights how integrating community justice systems with formal courts can enhance access to justice and reduce the time and cost of dispute resolution. The report concluded that strengthening AJS could reduce the volume of cases in courts and improve judicial efficiency.

conciliation, and arbitration, the BJS ensures that conflicts are settled in a manner that is culturally sensitive, efficient, and restorative

1. Almazan, K. V. (2025). The barangay justice system as a peace-building mechanism in Barangay Salumague, Paniqui, Tarlac. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andan, J., & Sumayo, R. (2025). Evaluating the resolving disputes practices of Lupong Tagapamayapa: Constituents’ view. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Araña, R., et al. (2023). Enhancing community conflict resolution skills: A training needs assessment for Lupong Tagapamayapa. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Benter, J. B. (2020). An assessment of the Barangay Justice System in Hagonoy, Bulacan: Basis for enhancing mediation procedure. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Benter, J. B. (2020). An Assessment of the Barangay Justice System in Hagonoy, Bulacan: Basis for Enhancing Mediation Procedure. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN ID3684191 code425 5190.pdf?abstractid=3684191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Benter, J. B. (2020). An assessment of the barangay justice system in Hagonoy, Bulacan: Basis for enhancing mediation procedure. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brillantes, A. B., & Fernandez, M. T. (2020). Decentralization and local governance in the Philippines: Continuity and change. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dalanon, J. (2026). Revising consolidated barangay cases in the Philippines. Respicio & Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Erivera, J. C. (2025). Performance of Lupon Tagapamayapa in dispute settlement under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law. International Journal of Research in Academic World. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garcia, A. B., & Reyes, J. F. (2021). Mediation and conciliation practices in the barangay justice system: A qualitative study. Philippine Journal of Community Development, 12(1), 29–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Garcia, R. P., & Santiago, M. A. (2020). Conflict resolution and cultural justice in the Katarungang Pambarangay. Southeast Asian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 5(3), 87–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Golocan, J. M. (2020). Effectiveness of Katarungang Pambarangay in resolving community disputes. International Journal of Advanced Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ignatian International Journal. (2025). Level of Implementation of Barangay Justice System. https://icceph.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/BARANGAY-JUSTICE-SYSTEM KATIPUNAN.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lupao, G. H., & Alejandro, H. T. (2022). Barangay justice system in the Philippines: Challenges and innovations. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra11415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lupao, G. H., & Alejandro, H. T. (2022). Barangay justice system in the Philippines: Challenges and innovations. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Medina, J. T., & Agustin, A. C. (2021). From elders to Lupon: Tracing the roots of barangay conflict resolution mechanisms. Journal of Local Governance and Policy Studies, 5(1), 56–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mendoza, M. R., & Mata, C. P. (2019). Community mediation as a tool for restorative justice in the barangay justice system. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 20(1), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Menzi, A. (2025). The strategies of Lupon Tagapamayapa in resolving disputes. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Navea, D. L. (2025). Overview of the Barangay Justice System. https://www.scribd.com/presentation/567030439/The-BARANGAY-JUSTICE-SYSTEM-in-the-Philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pereyra, E., Semorlan, J. Jr., Tabujara, E., & Torculas, B. (2023). Effectiveness in the implementation of Barangay Justice System in Barangay Batasan Hills, Quezon City. Ascendens Asia Singapore Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Respicio, H. (2024). Settlement of disputes in barangay justice system in the Philippines. Respicio & Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Respicio, H. (2026). Understanding the mediation process in the Philippine justice system. Respicio & Co. Law Firm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Santos, M. P., & Reyes, J. D. (2023). Barriers to effective barangay dispute resolution: A community-based analysis. Philippine Journal of Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tadiar, A. (2025). Impact of the Barangay Justice System on Decongesting Court Dockets. Philippine Law Journal. https://philippinelawjournal.org/wp content/uploads/2025/02/83PLJ498TADIAR.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Teves, L. (2025). Barangay justice system vis-à-vis dispute resolution effectiveness. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). https://rsisinternational.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Teves, V. L. (2024). Barangay Justice System vis-à-vis dispute resolution in local communities. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNAFEI. (2023). Topic Three: Community Involvement in the Courts. https://www.unafei.or.jp/activities/pdf/joint philippines/topic3.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Valones, A. D. (2025). The legal framework for enhancing barangay justice system as a grassroots-based alternative dispute resolution mechanism in the Philippines. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 10(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar