Influence of Drilling Parameters on Tool Wear, Delamination, and Surface Integrity of 3D Carbon–Carbon Composites

Authors

G. Ramaguru

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad (India)

Dr. K. Saraswathamma

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000075

Subject Category: Engineering

Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 1062-1070

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-11

Accepted: 2026-06-16

Published: 2026-06-23

Abstract

Carbon fibre-reinforced carbon matrix (C/C) composites are advanced engineering materials widely employed in aerospace and thermal protection systems due to their excellent strength retention and thermal stability at extremely high temperatures in non-oxidizing environments. However, their anisotropic and heterogeneous structure makes them difficult to machine, often resulting in defects such as delamination, fibre pull-out, surface damage, and rapid tool wear during drilling operations. In the present study, the drilling performance of 3D carbon–carbon composites was experimentally investigated using carbide-based drill tools under dry machining conditions. Drilling experiments were conducted at spindle speeds of 300, 700, and 1000 rpm and feed rates of 20, 40, and 60 mm/min. The effects of machining parameters on tool wear, drilling temperature, hole roundness, delamination factor, and surface roughness were evaluated using optical microscopy, coordinate measuring machine (CMM) measurements, and surface characterization techniques. The results revealed that tool wear was primarily characterized by edge chipping, abrasion, and carbon particle adhesion. The drilling temperature remained relatively stable, ranging from 36.06 °C to 36.96 °C, owing to the high thermal conductivity of the composite. The minimum delamination factor of 1.0063 was obtained at 700 rpm, whereas the best surface finish (1.121 μm) and dimensional accuracy were achieved at 1000 rpm. The study demonstrates that appropriate selection of drilling parameters significantly improves hole quality and machinability of 3D carbon–carbon composites. The findings provide useful guidelines for optimizing drilling operations in aerospace and other high-temperature engineering applications.

Keywords

Carbon–carbon composites; Drilling; Tool wear; Delamination factor; Surface roughness; Roundness error; Machinability.

Downloads

References

1. [1] M. Li, X. Jiang, Y. Chen, and X. Yang, “Hole surface morphology and tool wear mechanisms during cutting 3D carbon/carbon composites using diamond core drill,” Ceramics International, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. [2] R. Luo, “Fabrication of carbon/carbon composites by an electrified preform heating CVI method,” Carbon, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1957–1963, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. [3] F. Muhammed, T. Lavaggi, S. Advani, M. Mirotznik, and J. W. Gillespie, “Influence of material and process parameters on microstructure evolution during the fabrication of carbon–carbon composites: A review,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 56, no. 32, pp. 17877–17914, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. [4] C. Xu, L. Song, H. Zhu, S. Meng, W. Xie, and H. Jin, “Experimental investigation on the mechanical behaviour of 3D carbon/carbon composites under biaxial compression,” Composite Structures, vol. 188, pp. 7–14, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. [5] A. P. Mouritz, “Tensile fatigue properties of 3D composites with through-thickness reinforcement,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2503–2510, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. [6] P. M. George, B. K. Raghunath, L. M. Manocha, and A. M. Warrier, “Modelling of machinability parameters of carbon–carbon composite—A response surface approach,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 153–154, pp. 920–924, 2004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. [7] K. V. Krishna Sastry, V. Seshagiri Rao, K. Palanikumar, R. Dhanalakshmi, and A. Kuravi, “Assessment of process parameters influencing delamination factor on the drilling of CFRC composite material with TiN coated carbide tool,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. [8] C. Shan, M. Zhang, Y. Yang, S. Zhang, and M. Luo, “Defect analysis in drilling needle-punched carbon–carbon composites perpendicular to nonwoven fabrics,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 8, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. [9] B. Adda, A. Belaadi, M. Boumaaza, and M. Bourchak, “Experimental investigation and optimization of delamination factors in the drilling of jute fiber–reinforced polymer biocomposites with multiple estimators,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 116, no. 9, pp. 2885–2907, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. [10] B. P. Mishra, D. Mishra, and P. Panda, “Drilling of glass fibre reinforced polymer/nanopolymer composite laminates: A review,” International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 153–172, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. [11] T. Yin, Y. Wang, L. He, and X. Gong, “Stress and damage development in the carbonization process of manufacturing carbon/carbon composites,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 138, pp. 27–33, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. [12] O. Isbilir and E. Ghassemieh, “Numerical investigation of the effects of drill geometry on drilling induced delamination of carbon fiber reinforced composites,” Composite Structures, vol. 105, pp. 126–133, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. [13] J. Sutar, S. N. Teli, and S. Lad, “Optimization techniques for drilling of CFRP and GFRP composite,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Engineering Confluence (EQUINOX), Navi Mumbai, India, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. [14] A. Faraz, D. Biermann, and K. Weinert, “Cutting edge rounding: An innovative tool wear criterion in drilling CFRP composite laminates,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 49, no. 15, pp. 1185–1196, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. [15] M. S. Won and C. K. H. Dharan, “Chisel edge and pilot hole effects in drilling composite laminates,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 242–247, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. [16] A. Salunkhe and V. Warule, “Drilling on fibre reinforced polymer/non-polymer composites laminates: A review,” International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology, pp. 1–5, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. [17] C. Shan, M. Zhang, Y. Yang, S. Zhang, and M. Luo, “A dynamic cutting force model for transverse orthogonal cutting of unidirectional carbon/carbon composites considering fiber distribution,” Composite Structures, vol. 251, Art. no. 112668, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. [18] Q. Shen, T. Wang, Q. Song, F. Ye, H. Li, and M. W. Fu, “Unraveling of the laser drilling of carbon/carbon composites: Ablation mechanisms, shape evolution, and damage evaluation,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 184, Art. no. 103978, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. [19] Y. Q. Wang, L. S. Han, H. B. Liu, K. Li, and Y. Ma, “Effect of cryogenic conditions on the drilling performance of carbon-carbon composites,” in Proc. ASME Int. Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, 2017, Paper V002T03A003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. [20] M. Singh and R. Asthana, “Characterization of brazed joints of CC composite to Cu-clad-Molybdenum,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 3010–3019, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles