Perception of Women Aged 15-49 Years Towards Female Genital Mutilation in Umueme Community, Obingwa L.G.A, Abia State

This study is on the perception of women aged 15-49 years towards female genital mutilation in the Umueme community, Obingwa L.G.A., Abia State. The 80 women were randomly selected on different days at different times in the health centre. The questionnaire was the instrument for data collection. The data collected was analysed using inferential statistics, including the Chi-square (χ²) test of association, to establish relationships between selected demographic variables and awareness/perception of FGM and socio-cultural factors influencing the practice of FGM. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. The result showed that, out of the 80 respondents studied, the majority, 37 (46.3%), were between the ages of 26–35 years, while 28 (35.0%) were aged 36–45 years. All 80 (100%) respondents had heard of FGM before in their lives, with the major sources of information being friends/relatives 33 (41.3%), social gatherings 29 (36.3%), and association with religious leaders 15 (18.8%). The chi-square test of association indicated that there was a significant association between age and belief (χ²=8.421, p=0.038), marital status and perception (χ²=9.114, p=0.028), religion and cultural support for FGM (χ²=7.306, p=0.026), religion approves the practice of FGM (χ²=11.573, p=0.003), educational level and awareness of the negative health effects of FGM (χ²=12.447, p=0.006) and the opinion on discouraging FGM due to health risks (χ²=10.638, p=0.014). However, there were no significant associations found between age and the perception of the effects of FGM on health (p=0.102); occupation and belief that FGM protects virginity (p=0.121); parity and support for the continuation of FGM (p=0.121); and age and trust in the midwives to advise on FGM (p=0.171). The findings indicate a growing awareness of the harmful consequences of FGM among women in the Umueme community. Nevertheless, persistent cultural influences, family pressures, and traditional beliefs continue to sustain the practice.

Perception, Female, Genital, Genital Mutilation

1. Adewuyi, E. O., Auta, A., Khanal, V., Tapshak, S. J., Zhao,. (2021). Cohort analysis of female genital cutting in Nigeria: Pevalence, daughter circumcision and attitude towards its discontinuation. BMC Women’s Health, 21(1), Article 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01294-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahanonu, E. L., & Obi, A. I. (2021). Mothers’ perceptions of female genital mutilation in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 24(6), 823–829. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alsibiani, S. A., & Rouzi, A. A. (2020). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and Sterility, 93(3), 722–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amnesty International. (2022). Female genital mutilation: A global concern. Amnesty International Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anyanwu, C. E., et al. (2025). Knowledge and attitude of Nigerian women aged 15-49 years on the practice of female genital mutilation. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 10(2), 171-182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ayenew, A. A., Mol, B. W., Abeje, G., & Bradford, B. (2025). Healthcare and community perspectives on female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): A qualitative study. EClinicalMedicine, 90, 103604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beausang, J., & Mama, S. T. (2023). A Summary of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting for the Pediatric and Adolescent Care Provider. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 36(2), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2022.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dattijo, L.M., Nyango D. D., & Osagie E. O. (2018). Awareness, Perception and Practice of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dilbaz, B., İflazoğlu, N., & Tanın, S. A. (2019). An overview of female genital mutilation. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.77854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Echeozo, J. F. (2024). Nigerian nurses’ perceptions of caring for women with FGM. Walden University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2021). Sociology (9th ed.) Polity Press. ISBN:9781509539222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (2017). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (9th ed.). Collins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ibekwe, P. C., Nwokike, C. C., Alagwu, E. A., & Kalu, S. O. (2021). Perception of mothers on female genital mutilation in South-East Nigeria. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 13(2), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). (2020). The role of midwives in ending female genital mutilation. ICM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kaplan, A., Hechavarría, S., Martín, M., & Bonhoure, I. (2021). Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia. BMJ Global Health, 6(2), e004253. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kisendi, D. D., Lyakurwa, D., Paulo, H. A., Mboya, I. B., Mrema, E. J., & Kweka, E. J. (2025). Trends and determinants of female genital mutilation prevalence among women of reproductive age in Tanzania and Kenya: A demographic and health survey analysis (2008-2022). BMC Public Health, 25, Article 23519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Leininger, M. M., & McFarland, M. R. (2021). Culture care diversity and universality: A worldwide nursing theory (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morlighem, C., Visée, C., & Nnanatu, C. C. (2024). Comparison of FGM prevalence among Nigerian women aged 15–49 years using two household surveys conducted before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health, 24, 1866. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19069-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. NDHS (2023). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2023-2024. https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/nigeria-demographic-and-health-survey-2023-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nkeiruka, J. J., & Chiejina, E. N. (2024). Perception and knowledge of female genital mutilation among indigenous childbearing women. Saudi Journal of Nursing and Health Care [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Obijiofor, B. N., Enete, C. A., Nnoyelu, C. E., Umeonunihu, O.S., Emeka, E. A., Okoro, C C., Akabuike, J. C., Oguejiofor, C. B., & Eleje, G. U. (2020). Female genital mutilation: Prevalence, awareness and attitude among Igbo women of child-bearing age in Nigeria. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 3(3), 145-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ogunlaja, O. A., Ogunlaja, I. P., & Ogunlaja, O. O. (2023). Prevalence, knowledge and attitude towards female genital mutilation among women in Abraka community, Delta State. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 12(1), 23-37. https://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jnhs/papers/vol12-issue1/ser-2/F1202023137.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Salah, N., Cottler-Cassanova, S., Petignat, P. (2024). Investigating factors associated with migration and cultural change in relation to female genital mutilation/cutting among populations from FGM practicing countries living in western countries: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(5), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21050528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tarr-Attia, C.K., Boiwu, G.H. & Martínez-Pérez, G. ‘Birds of the same feathers fly together’: midwives’ experiences with pregnant women and FGM/C complications - a grounded theory study in Liberia. Reprod Health 16, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0681-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations Population Fund [UNFPA] (2023). Ending female genital mutilation. UNFPA Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNICEF. (2022). Female genital mutilation: A global review. UNICEF Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Okeke, T. C. (2022). Female genital mutilation and women’s health in Nigeria. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 12(1), 18–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. UNICEF (2025). Female genital mutilation: Latest data and trends. UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Health Organization [WHO] (2022). Female genital mutilation: Key facts sheet. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Health Organization [WHO] (2023). WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Tribal Child Nutrition and Health in District of Sundargarh: A Public Health Review of ICDS Intervention
• Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Towards Prostate Cancer Screening Amongst Men Aged 40-60 Years in The Buea Health District: A Cross-Sectional Study
• Compliance with JCI Protocols: A Focus on Employee Safety
• Influence and Involvement of Teachers in Menstrual Hygiene Management of Female Secondary School Students in Kogi State, Nigeria
• A Critical Evaluation of Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana in Bihar