Efficacy and User Satisfaction with the iHOMIS System: Basis for Iterative Systems Development

Authors

Rosemarie C. Siason

Independent Researcher (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600468

Subject Category: Development

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 6777-6787

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-05

Accepted: 2026-06-10

Published: 2026-06-26

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Integrated Hospital Operations and Management Information System (iHOMIS) Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system in supporting patient admission processes among physicians in the emergency departments of Culion Sanitarium and General Hospital and Coron District Hospital.
Study design: A mixed methods descriptive–correlational research design was used in the study.
Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at Culion Sanitarium and General Hospital and Coron District Hospital during April 2026.
Methodology: The study involved 30 emergency department physicians selected through total population sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of Likert-scale items and open-ended questions assessing system quality, information quality, user satisfaction, and challenges encountered in using iHOMIS during patient admission processes. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation, and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient at the 0.05 level of significance, while qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: Findings revealed that physicians generally perceived the iHOMIS EMR system as effective in supporting patient admission processes. System quality obtained an overall weighted mean of 3.57, information quality obtained 3.64, and user satisfaction obtained 3.27, all verbally interpreted as Very High. Ease of use received the highest mean score (3.76), while interoperability obtained the lowest mean score (2.73), indicating limitations in external system integration.
Common challenges identified included system downtime, slow performance, interface and navigation difficulties, duplicate patient entries, data loss, insufficient training, workflow disruptions, and limited interoperability. Correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between system quality and user satisfaction (r = 0.055, p = 0.773) and between information quality and user satisfaction (r = 0.047, p = 0.805).
Conclusion: The iHOMIS EMR system is generally effective in supporting patient admission processes in emergency department settings. However, technical instability, workflow integration concerns, limited interoperability, and insufficient customization continue to affect operational efficiency. Findings further suggest that physician satisfaction is influenced not only by system and information quality but also by organizational and workflow-related factors.

Keywords

: Integrated Hospital Operations and Management Information System (iHOMIS); Electronic Medical Records

Downloads

References

1. Adler-Milstein, J., Jha, A. K., Hsiao, C. J., et al. (2017). Electronic health record adoption and interoperability challenges in hospitals. Health Affairs, 36(12), 2199–2205. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agarwal, R., Gao, G., DesRoches, C., & Jha, A. K. (2010). The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and challenges. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albagmi, S. (2021). The effectiveness of EMR implementation regarding reducing documentation errors and waiting time for patients in outpatient clinics: A systematic review. F1000Research, 10, 514. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.45039.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almarashde, F., Jarrar, M., & Alsmadi, M. (2021). Evaluation of hospital information management system with information systems success model. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 14(4), 363-372. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.818077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Antor, E., Owusu-Marfo, J., & Kissi, J. (2024). Usability evaluation of electronic health records at the trauma and emergency directorates at the Komfo Anokye teaching hospital in the Ashanti region of Ghana. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24(1), 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02636-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bassi, J., Lau, F., & Bardach, S. (2020). Understanding the adoption of electronic medical records in developing countries: A systematic review. Journal of Global Health, 10(2), 020302. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.020302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bassi, A., Arfini, F., Cappa, F., & Curtarelli, M. (2020). Electronic medical records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants. PLOS One, 15(6), e0234108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Born, C., Schwarz, R., Böttcher, T. P., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2024). The role of information systems in emergency department decision-making—a literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(7), 1608-1621. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boonstra, A., Versluis, A., & Vos, J. F. J. (2014). Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 370. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2024). Electronic health records. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/e-health/records [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Health. (2017). Memorandum No. 2017-0083: Implementation of integrated hospital operations and management information system (iHOMIS). Manila, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Development Academy of the Philippines. (2024). Innovating healthcare: iHOMIS transforms the Laguna Medical Center. Retrieved from https://coe-psp.dap.edu.ph/compendium-innovation/innovating-healthcare-ihomis-transforms-the-laguna-medical-center/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ghildayal, N., Nagavedu, K., Wiltz, J. L., Back, S., Boehmer, T. K., Draper, C., Greene, S. K., Reynolds, M., Rohan, P., Stein, Z., Talbot, H. K., Vu, Q. M., Wong, C. A., Yusuf, H., Gundlapalli, A. V., & Garg, S. (2024). Public health surveillance in electronic health records: Lessons from PCORnet. Preventing Chronic Disease, 21, E17. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.230417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Holmgren, A. J., Downing, N. L., Tang, M., Sharp, C., Longhurst, C., & Hripcsak, G. (2024). Electronic health record usability, satisfaction, and burnout for family physicians. JAMA Network Open, 7(8), e2426956. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26956 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ifinedo, P. (2017). Validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. Healthcare Informatics Research, 23(1), 60-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ikenyei, U., & Haggerty, N. (2024). Validating the DeLone and McLean's model in a developing country's infectious disease pandemic context. BMC Infectious Diseases, 24(1), 594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09483-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kalankesh, L. R., Dastgiri, S., & Rafeey, M. (2020). Factors influencing user satisfaction with information systems: A systematic review. Galen Medical Journal, 9, e1686. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kim, S., Lee, K. H., Hwang, H., & Yoo, S. (2021). Investigation of usability problems of electronic medical record systems in the emergency department. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(3), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Koumamba, A. P., Bisvigou, U. J., Ngoungou, E. B., & Diallo, G. (2021). Health information systems in developing countries: case of African countries. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01597-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kruse, C. S., Kristof, C., Jones, B., Mitchell, E., Martinez, A., & others. (2016). Barriers to electronic health record adoption: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Systems, 40, 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lei, J., Liu, J., & Li, W. (2021). Hospital information systems in developing countries: a state-of-the-art systematic review. Kybernetes, 50(12), 3422-3442. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2020-0590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lwoga, E. T., & Lwoga, N. B. (2017). User acceptance of mobile payment tools: The effects of user-centric security, system characteristics and gender. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 81(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00595.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Magoulas, T., Leung, R. C., Xylogiannopoulos, K. F., & Karampelas, P. (2022). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records from the perspective of physicians and nurses: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 168, 104587. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mirheidari, S. A., Arabi, M., Shokraneh, L., Karimialavijeh, E., Koohestani, H. R., & Baghcheghi, N. (2025). Challenges faced by doctors and nurses in the emergency department: An integrated review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 14, 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mtebe, J. S., & Kondoro, A. W. (2021). Using the DeLone and McLean model to evaluate the success of an implemented hospital information system in Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(3), e12167. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Muhiyaddin, R., Elfadl, A., Mohamed, E., Shah, Z., Alam, T., Abd-Alrazaq, A., & Househ, M. (2022). Electronic health records and physician burnout: A scoping review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 289, 481-484. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nguyen, T. T. H. (2023). Developing health information systems in developing countries: Lessons learnt from a longitudinal action research study in Vietnam. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(2), e12268. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Park, S., Marquard, J., Austin, R. R., Pieczkiewicz, D., Jantraporn, R., & Delaney, C. W. (2024). A systematic review of nurses' perceptions of electronic health record usability based on the human factor goals of satisfaction, performance, and safety. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 42(3), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rahman, M. M., & Islam, M. S. (2024). Success factors in the implementation of healthcare information systems (HIS) among developing countries. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 23(4), 762-771. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v23i4.74684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rouadi, P. W., Anouti, B., Roumani, Y. F., Leroux, B., Fares, S., Cheaito, M. A., & Naja, Z. (2024). Electronic medical record implementation in the emergency department in a low-resource country: Lessons learned. PLOS One, 19(2), e0298027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Salwei, M. E., Carayon, P., Hoonakker, P. L., Hose, B. Z., Ross, J. C., Hundt, A. S., Kelly, M. M., Shabot, M. M., & Patterson, E. S. (2024). Usability of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department: Lessons learned for design and implementation. Human Factors, 66(3), 647-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221086513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Seid, M. A., Abdela, O. A., Zeleke, E. G., Hussen, M. A., & Dessie, Y. (2020). The applicability of the modified technology acceptance model (TAM) on the sustainable adoption of eHealth systems in resource-limited settings. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 13, 1827-1837. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S284973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sutton, S. G., & Arnold, V. (2016). Focus on usability in health information systems: Impacts on clinician satisfaction and system success. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 89, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tetik, G., Türkeli, S., Pinar, S., & Tarim, M. (2024). Health information systems with technology acceptance model approach: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 190, 105545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tun, S. Y. Y., Madanian, S., & others. (2023). Clinical information system implementation in developing countries: Requirements, success factors, and recommendations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(4), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ward, M. J., Froehle, C. M., Hart, K. W., Collins, S. P., & Lindsell, C. J. (2014). The effect of electronic health record implementation on emergency department operational measures of performance. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 63(6), 723-730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wu, Y., Wu, M., Wang, C., Lin, J., Liu, J., & Liu, S. (2024). Evaluating the prevalence of burnout among health care professionals related to electronic health record use: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Medical Informatics, 12, e54811. https://doi.org/10.2196/54811 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yakubu, A. N., & Dasuki, S. I. (2019). Assessing eLearning systems success in Nigeria: An application of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.28945/4281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles