Community Perceptions and Responses to the Rise in Reported Defilement Cases: A Qualitative Study of Attitudes, Reporting Practices and the Dynamics of Historical Silence in Mungwi District, Zambia

Background: Defilement and child sexual abuse (CSA) remain major public health, legal and human rights concerns globally and within Zambia. Recent increases in reported defilement cases in Zambia have generated public concern regarding whether the rise reflects an actual escalation in abuse or improvements in disclosure, awareness and reporting mechanisms associated with the erosion of historical silence surrounding defilement.
Aim: To explore community perceptions and responses to the rise in reported defilement cases in Mungwi District, Zambia, with particular attention to attitudes, reporting practices, stigma and socio-cultural dynamics shaping disclosure and concealment.
Methods: The study was guided by an interpretivist paradigm and employed an exploratory qualitative research design. Purposive and Snowball non-random sampling methods were used to recruit 48 participants comprising community members, traditional leaders, teachers, health workers, police officers, and child protection stakeholders from selected rural communities in Mungwi District. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. Qualitative data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six step thematic analysis framework.
Findings: The findings reveal that defilement is shaped by interconnected social, cultural, economic, and institutional factors. Poverty, economic dependency, weak parental supervision, alcohol and substance abuse, and harmful patriarchal beliefs were identified as major contributors to children’s vulnerability to abuse and exploitation. The study further established that stigma, fear of shame, victim-blaming attitudes, and concerns over family reputation contribute significantly to concealment and non-reporting of cases. Historical silence surrounding sexual abuse was found to be socially reinforced through cultural taboos, informal settlements, and distrust in formal justice systems. Participants reported that delayed court processes, limited access to child protection services, and inadequate psychosocial support discourage many families from pursuing legal action. At the same time, the findings demonstrated evidence of gradual erosion of historical silence through increased awareness campaigns, legal reforms, school-based sensitisation programmes, media engagement, and community education initiatives. Consequently, participants perceived the rise in reported defilement cases as reflecting both the continued prevalence of abuse and improved disclosure and reporting practices within communities.
Conclusion: The study concludes that addressing defilement requires a holistic and multi-sectoral approach that addresses structural poverty, harmful social norms, institutional weaknesses, and stigma while strengthening child protection systems, access to justice, community awareness, and survivor support services. The study recommends strengthening rural child protection structures, enhancing community sensitisation, discouraging informal case settlements, improving psychosocial support services, and promoting coordinated responses among government institutions, traditional leaders, schools, religious organizations, and civil society actors.

Defilement; Child Sexual Abuse; Reporting Practices; Historical Silence; Stigma; Community Perceptions; Child Protection.

1. Addeo, D. F. (2013). Hermeneutics as a Research Method: How to do research using Hermeneutics approach. Italy: University of Salerno. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afrobarometer (2023). Public perceptions of child protection and gender-based violence in Zambia. Lusaka: Afrobarometer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Best, J. W. and Kahn, J. V. (2003). Research in Education. Boston: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication data. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bicchieri, C. (2017) Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biggerstaff, D. L. and Thompson, A. R. (2008). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Qualitative Methodology of Choice in Healthcare Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), pp. 214-224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Birks, M. and Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, pp. 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chilambe, H., Mulenga, R. and Phiri, M. (2023) ‘Cultural norms, stigma and barriers to reporting child sexual abuse in rural Zambia’. African Journal of Social Work, 13(2), pp. 88-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chitundu, K., Mwansa, L. and Zulu, P. (2024) ‘Family concealment and reporting practices in cases of child sexual abuse in Zambia’. Journal of Child Protection and Welfare, 9(1), pp. 45-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cislaghi, B. and Heise, L. (2020) ‘Gender norms and social norms: Differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 42(2), pp. 407-422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Creswell, J. W. and Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Earnshaw, V.A. and Chaudoir, S. R. (2009). ‘From conceptualising to measuring HIV stigma: A review of HIV stigma mechanism measures’. AIDS and Behaviour, 13(6), pp. 1160-1177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Floyd, A. and Arthur, L. (2012). Researching from within: External and Internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research and Methods in Education, 35(2), pp. 171-180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fulu, E. and Miedema, S. (2022). ‘Violence against women and children in low-income settings’. The Lancet Global Health, 10(8), pp. e1085-e1086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fulu, E., Kerr-Wilson, A. and Lang, J. (2023). ‘Preventing violence against women and girls through social norm transformation’. Global Public Health, 18(4), pp. 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Government of the Republic of Zambia (2022). Children’s Code Act No. 12 of 2022. Lusaka: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Greenbanks, P. (2003). The role of values in educational research: The case for reflexivity. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), pp. 791-801. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hesse-Biber, S. and Johnson, R. B. (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ligiero, D., Hart, C., Fulu, E. and Thomas, A. (2022). ‘What works to prevent and respond to child sexual exploitation and abuse’. Child Abuse and Neglect, 124, pp. 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Matafwali, B., Phiri, M. and Chileshe, P. (2024). ‘Reporting barriers and disclosure patterns in child sexual abuse cases in Zambia’. African Journal of Social Work, 14(2), pp. 55-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Matafwali, B., Rolls, S. and Msidi, E. (2024). ‘Patterns and trends in child sexual abuse reporting in Zambia before, during and after COVID-19’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(4), pp. 755-774. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. McPherson, K., Ndlovu, S. and Banda, T. (2025). ‘Economic vulnerability and disclosure of child sexual abuse in rural African communities’. Journal of Child Protection Studies, 9(1), pp. 44-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Meinck, F., Cluver, L. and Boyes, M. (2022). ‘Risk factors for child sexual abuse in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review’. Child Abuse and Neglect, 124, p. 105451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Qazi, S. W., and Rashidi, Z. (2018b). Phenomenological Experiences of Women through Microcredit Programs of Upper Sindh: Stepping towards the Empowerment. NICE Research Journal, 200-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Smith, J. A. and Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Smith, J. A. (ed), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, 2nd edition, pp. 53-80. London: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Smith, J. A., Flower, P., and Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. USA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tembo, J., Lishimpi, K. and Mutale, W. (2021). ‘Institutional barriers to child protection service delivery in Zambia’. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(4), pp. 521-533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UN Women (2024). Gender Equality and Violence Prevention in Africa. New York: UN Women. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund [UNICEF] (2023). Child Sexual Abuse, Disclosure and Protection Systems: Global Trends Report. New York: UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund [UNICEF] (2023). Violence Against Children in Eastern and Southern Africa: Regional Report. New York: UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa (2024). Violence Against Children in Eastern and Southern Africa: Regional Overview Report. Nairobi: UNICEF ESARO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. UNICEF Zambia (2025). Child Protection and Violence Against Children Report. Lusaka: UNICEF Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. World Health Organization [WHO] (2022). Violence Against Children: Key Facts. Geneva: WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zambia Police Service (2025). Victim Support Unit Annual Crime Statistical Bulletin. Lusaka: Zambia Police Service. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study