The TOEthical Model: Deconstructing the Technological, Organizational, and Ethical Determinants of Generative AI Adoption in Kenyan University Research Ecosystems

Authors

Agwenyi C.A.

Department Information Technology, Kibabii University, Bungoma (Kenya)

Nambiro Alice

Department Information Technology, Kibabii University, Bungoma (Kenya)

Etene Yonah

Department of Computer Sciencem School of Computing and Informatics Kibabii University, Bungoma (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000192

Subject Category: Research

Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 2683-2690

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-06

Accepted: 2026-06-11

Published: 2026-06-29

Abstract

The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a transformative shift in the global academic research lifecycle. However, traditional technology adoption models like the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework often prioritize institutional and competitive pressures, failing to account for the acute ethical dilemmas inherent in higher education. This paper proposes and conceptualizes the TOEthical Model, a hybrid macro-micro framework that replaces traditional environmental factors with an explicit Ethical dimension, while using constructs from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as micro-level behavioral mediators. Focusing on the unique context of Kenyan universities characterized by advanced national digital infrastructure alongside localized resource constraints and structural data vulnerabilities, this paper maps out how Technological capabilities, Organizational readiness, and Ethical safeguards collectively predict Gen AI research practices. We establish a theoretical paradigm demonstrating how institutional policies shape individual researcher perceptions, ultimately driving robust, high-integrity academic adoption.

Keywords

Generative AI, TOEthical Model, TAM, Kenyan Universities, Research Integrity

Downloads

References

1. Balaskas, G., Papadopoulos, H., Pappa, D., Loisel, Q., & Chastin, S. (2025). A framework for domain-specific dataset creation and adaptation of large language models. Computers, 14(5), 172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boretti, A. (2026). Hallucinations in generative AI: A threat to scholarly integrity and the urgent need for publisher-led academically supervised verification. Energy Research & Social Science, 136, 104720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cagle, A., & Ahmed, A. M. C. (2024). Architecting Enterprise AI Applications: A Guide to Designing Reliable, Scalable, and Secure Enterprise-Grade AI Solutions. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information seeking behavior and technology adoption, 205(219), 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Disu, L. (2025). Becoming with AI: Identity and Meaning-Making Among Graduate Students in Creative Disciplines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Giray, L., Sevnarayan, K., & Ranjbaran Madiseh, F. (2025). Beyond policing: AI writing detection tools, trust, academic integrity, and their implications for college writing. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(1), 83-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Holmström, J., & Magnusson, J. (2025). Navigating the organizational AI journey: The AI transformation framework. Business Horizons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jaja, C. (2025). THE FUTURE OF INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES IN THE AGE OF AI AND DATA-DRIVEN SCHOLARSHIP. Information Technologist, 22(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. McIntosh, T. R., Susnjak, T., Arachchilage, N., Liu, T., Xu, D., Watters, P., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2025). Inadequacies of large language model benchmarks in the era of generative artificial intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Wang, Y. C., Xue, J., Wei, C., & Kuo, C. C. J. (2023). An overview on generative AI at scale with edge–cloud computing. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 4, 2952-2971. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles