A Syllabus-Based Review of English Communication Courses in Management Programs of Assam

Authors

Dr Pulak Bora

Assistant Professor of English School of Business the Assam Kaziranga University (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000195

Subject Category: Business Management,

Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 2732-2738

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-08

Accepted: 2026-06-13

Published: 2026-06-29

Abstract

English has become an indispensable tool for academic and professional communication, particularly in management education where graduates are expected to demonstrate effective written and oral communication skills. Recognizing the growing importance of workplace communication, management institutions have incorporated English communication courses into their curricula. This study examines how English communication is conceptualized and delivered in MBA programs across selected public and private institutes in Assam.
The study aims to explore how English communication is introduced and framed in MBA programs. It examines the objectives, content, and teaching methods outlined in business communication syllabi and assess the alignment between course contents and real-world managerial communication needs. The study also aims to identify shared trends, strengths, and curricular gaps to strengthen future course design.
A qualitative comparative syllabus analysis was undertaken using MBA curricula and course documents collected from selected institutions. The analysis was guided by the principles of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and needs analysis frameworks proposed by Hutchinson and Waters (1987) and Dudley-Evans (1998). Course objectives, content areas, pedagogical approaches, and assessment strategies were systematically examined to fulfil the objectives.
The findings indicate that while communication courses are widely included in MBA curricula, considerable variation exists in their scope and orientation. Most courses emphasize oral communication and presentation skills, whereas workplace writing tasks receive relatively less attention. The study concludes that greater alignment with industry communication practices is needed through needs-based and practice-oriented curriculum design.

Keywords

Business Communication, MBA Curriculum, English for Specific Purposes, Needs Analysis

Downloads

References

1. Bhatia, V. K., & Bremner, S. (2012). English for Business Communication. Language Teaching, 45(4), 410–445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boozer, D. W., & Stacks, R. W. (1984). An Experimental Study of Written Communication Apprehension and Language Choice in a Business Setting. Journal of Advanced Composition, 5, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brimi, H. (2012). Teaching Writing in the Shadow of Standardized Writing Assessment: An Exploratory Study. American Secondary Education, 41(1), 52–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. University of Pittsburgh Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dilley, D. R. (1961). A Business Manager’s Look at Business Writing. The English Journal, 50(4), 265–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2013). Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gautam, G., & Ghimire, S. (2021). Exploring Communication Skills for Management Graduates: The Industry’s Perspective. Journal of Management Research, 21(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Raman, M., & Sharma, S. (2013). Technical Communication: Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Smeltzer, L. R., & Leonard, N. H. (1986). Managerial Writing: The Communication of Managerial Ideas and Concepts. Business Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 20–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wardrope, W. J. (2002). Department chairs’ perceptions of the importance of business communication skills. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 60–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Weldy, T. G. (2017). Business communication courses and job readiness: An employer perspective. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(4), 489–512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles