Drawing As a Catalyst for Creativity in Secondary School Visual Art Education: A Narrative Review of Contemporary Educational Perspectives

Authors

Tian Li

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) (Malaysia)

Dr. Jamilah binti Omar

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000249

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 3437-3452

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-11

Accepted: 2026-06-16

Published: 2026-07-03

Abstract

This narrative review examines contemporary educational perspectives on the role of drawing in fostering creativity within secondary school visual art education. Rather than aiming for exhaustive coverage, this review selectively synthesizes influential and representative scholarship to construct a critical understanding of drawing-based creativity development.
Creativity is increasingly regarded as a key educational outcome in the twenty-first century, yet the role of drawing in fostering creativity within secondary school visual art education remains conceptually fragmented across educational, psychological, and sociocultural perspectives. This narrative review examines contemporary understandings of how drawing contributes to creativity development and synthesizes key theoretical and pedagogical insights relevant to secondary school contexts.
Relevant literature was purposively selected from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, with primary attention given to peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, alongside influential foundational works. The selected literature was analysed through thematic narrative synthesis to identify major conceptual themes, theoretical perspectives, educational challenges, and emerging pedagogical approaches.
The review demonstrates that drawing functions as a cognitive, expressive, and reflective practice that supports visual thinking, divergent thinking, self-expression, and creative confidence. Three complementary theoretical perspectives—Comprehensive Arts Education (CAE), Amabile’s Componential Theory of Creativity, and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory—collectively explain the curricular, psychological, and sociocultural dimensions of creativity development. The literature further highlights the potential of student-centred learning, project-based learning, STEAM education, digital technologies, reflective practice, and collaborative learning to strengthen creativity-oriented visual art education.
The review concludes that drawing-based learning represents a valuable pedagogical approach for fostering creativity in secondary school visual art education and proposes an integrated conceptual framework to guide future research and practice, particularly within examination-oriented educational settings

Keywords

Creativity; Visual Art Education; Drawing-Based Learning; Secondary Education; Creative Thinking

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, M., Khairani, M. Z., Amos, F. V., Aziz, M. N. A., & Ramlie, M. K. (2024). Learning to draw is learning to see: A comprehensive review of art and design practices in higher education. Idealogy Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v9i1.563 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The Contribution of Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory in Mediating L2 Knowledge Co-Construction. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity”. Westview Press. ISBN:9780813330341 https://lccn.loc.gov/96011298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2024). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33-64). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brauer, R., Ormiston, J., & Beausaert, S. (2025). Creativity-fostering teacher behaviors in higher education: A transdisciplinary systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 95(5), 899-928. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241258226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dobbs, S. M. (1992). The DBAE handbook: An overview of discipline-based art education. Oxford University Press. ISBN: ISBN-0-89236-214-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fan, J. E., Bainbridge, W. A., Chamberlain, R., & Wammes, J. D. (2023). Drawing as a versatile cognitive tool. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(9), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00212-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Freedman, K. (2025). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gil, T. O., Jr. (2025). Theories and models of creativity to support special needs education: A systematic review. ASEAN Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 4(2), 105–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Greer, W. D. (1984). Discipline-based art education: Approaching art as a subject of study. Studies in Art Education, 25(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1984.11650379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2091-2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09912-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Huang, L., Leung, S. K. Y., Li, J. W., & Wu, Z. (2024). How does comprehensive art education facilitate children's creativity? A mixed-methods study in China. Early Education and Development, 36(2), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2024.2404822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Isabirye, A. K., Moloi, K. C., Lebelo, R. S., & Khan, S. (2025). Cultivating creativity and innovation in the school curriculum for the 21st century: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i3.6647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jiawei, W., & Mokmin, N. A. M. (2023). Virtual reality technology in art education with visual communication design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15125–15143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11791-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kendrick, L., & McKay, S. (2020). Drawing as a transformative practice in art education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kilag, O. K. T., Maghanoy, D. A. F., Calzada-Seraña, K. R. D. D., & Ponte, R. B. (2024). Integrating Lev Vygotsky's sociocultural theory into online instruction: A case study. Repository Antis Publisher, 697933. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejlhss.v1i1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kukkonen, T., & Bolden, B. (2022). Nurturing creativity in the visual arts classroom: Understanding teacher strategies through Amabile's componential theory. Canadian Review of Art Education, 49(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.26443/crae.v49i1.166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Luo, Y. (2024). Challenges and strategies for cultivating critical thinking in Chinese art education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lyon, P. (2020). Using drawing in visual research: Materializing the invisible. In The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 297–308). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nikolić, M. (2024). Nurturing creativity: The role of art education in fostering children's expression and holistic development. International Journal of Science Academic Research, 5(1), 6822–6829. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. OECD. (2021). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Parmentier, D. D., Van Acker, B. B., Saldien, J., & Detand, J. (2021). A framework to design for meaning: Insights on use, practicality and added value within a project-based learning context. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 31(4), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09582-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pavlou, V., & Kadji-Beltran, C. (2021). Enhancing arts education with education for sustainable development competences: A proposed framework for visual arts education educators. In Arts, sustainability and education: ENO yearbook 2 (pp. 217–235). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6444-5_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rahma, A., Lyesmaya, D., Barkah, B., & Yaman, Y. (2025). Analysis of teacher strategies in improving student creativity through art learning: Literature study. In 5th International Conference on Education, Humanities, and Social Science (ICEHoS)-Japan series (pp. 121–135). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Raza, A. (2023). Art and education: Fostering creativity and critical thinking in humanity. Journal of Religion and Society, 1(1), 13–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Reimer, B. (1989). A comprehensive arts curriculum model. Design for Arts in Education, 90(6), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07320973.1989.9938161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Riley, H. (2021). A contemporary pedagogy of drawing. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 20(4), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2021.1980278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rose, G. (2022). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ryu, J. (2024). The direction of art education as education of creativity and imagination. Society for Art Education of Korea, 92, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.25297/aer.2024.92.69 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Samaniego, M., Usca, N., Salguero, J., & Quevedo, W. (2024). Creative thinking in art and design education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shermukhammadov, B. (2022). Creativity of a teacher in an innovative educational environment. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 22(12). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i12.5468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sternfeld, G. Z., Israeli, R., & Lapidot-Lefer, N. (2024). Creative education or educational creativity: Integrating arts, social emotional aspects and creative learning environments. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 25(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sukhera, J. (2022). Narrative reviews: Flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Swanzy-Impraim, E., Morris, J. E., Lummis, G. W., & Jones, A. (2022). Promoting creativity: Secondary visual art teachers' perceptions and understanding of creativity in Ghana. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Theile, C. M., & Beall, A. L. (2024). Narrative reviews of the literature: An overview. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 98(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and psychological measurement. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05532-000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tzuriel, D. (2021). The socio-cultural theory of Vygotsky. In D. Tzuriel, Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability (pp. 53–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72168-2_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Valquaresma, A. (2024). Creativity, agency and meaning-making: Unfolding developmental possibilities in twenty-first-century learning environments. In A. Valquaresma, Creativity and learning: Navigating transformative perspectives for complex and contemporary environments (pp. 105–126). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55276-3_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Vuk, S., & Bosnar, M. (2021). Process in contemporary visual art as a paradigm shift in the visual art education: Perspective of creativity. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.12632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yang, Y., Yee, M., & Heong, M. (2024). The significance of developing advanced higher order thinking skills in China's arts education. Journal of TVET and Technology Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30880/jttr.2024.02.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles