Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers

This study examines the predictive role of administrative support on teacher retention and organizational commitment among junior high school teachers in one of the private schools in Alicia, Isabela, Philippines. Data were gathered from 30 teachers using a quantitative case study design and analyzed through multiple regression analysis. The findings indicate that administrative support significantly predicted teacher retention and organizational commitment, which accounted for 29% and 31% of the variance, respectively. Among the three dimensions of administrative support, professional growth and recognition was the strongest indicator of teacher retention and organizational commitment. These results emphasize how crucial it is for school administrators to value teachers’ contributions and provide opportunities for professional advancement to strengthen their dedication and lower turnover intentions.

administrative support, teacher retention, organizational commitment, professional growth, recognition

1. Abarro, J. O. (2018). Factors affecting the performance of public-school teachers in the division of Antipolo City, Philippines. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(11), 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldosiry, N. (2020). How school administrators influence the retention of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233101338_How_School_Administrators_Influence_the_Retention_of_Teachers_of_Students_with_Emotional_and_Behavioral_Disorders [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bianca, P. J. (2011). How school administrators influence the retention of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. The Clearing House, 84(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). The trouble with teacher turnover: How teacher attrition affects students and schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(36). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3699 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cerado, E. (2025). Organizational commitment in integrated schools. E-Journals Philippines. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=29982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Conley, S., & You, S. (2017). Key influences on special education teachers’ intentions to leave: The effects of administrative support and teacher team efficacy in a mediational model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215608859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2022: Adoption of the Basic Education Development Plan 2030. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2022: School calendar and activities for SY 2022–2023. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Education (DepEd). (2024). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2024: Immediate removal of administrative tasks of public school teachers. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education (DepEd). (2024). DepEd Order No. 5, s. 2024: Sustained hiring of administrative support staff to ease teacher workload. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gilbert, C. R. (2023). Analyzing the influence of perceived administrative support on job satisfaction and organizational commitment among elementary teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Arkansas State University]. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://doi.org/10.25674/12345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hughes, L. W. (2012). The causes and an administrator’s role in reducing attrition [Master’s thesis, Grand Valley State University]. ScholarWorks @ GVSU. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/gradprojects/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and retention. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Karluki, K. A., Ndirangu, M., Song, K. A., & Oako, M. E. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of the factors that influence their morale and commitment to work: A case of Nakuru District. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 9(4), 1589–1597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lasseter, A. (2013). The effects of classroom autonomy, staff collegiality, and administrative support on teachers’ job satisfaction [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Martinez, J., & McAbee, S. (2020). School administrator support of teachers: A systematic review (2000–2019). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375825404_School_Administrator_Support_of_Teachers_A_Systematic_Review_2000-2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Marvel, J., Lyter, D. M., Peltola, P., Strizek, G. A., & Morton, B. A. (2006). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004–05 Teacher Follow-up Survey (NCES 2007–307). National Center for Education Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mercan, M. (2006). Organizational commitment in teachers: Organizational alienation and organizational citizenship [Master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mingoa, T. (2017). Filipino teachers’ stress levels and coping strategies. DLSU Research Congress Proceedings, 2017. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2017/LLI/LLI-I-020.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nazim, F., & Mahmood, A. (2018). A study of the relationship between leadership style and job satisfaction. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(1), 165–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nguyen, D., Crouch, M., & Springer, M. (2024). A meta-analysis of the antecedents of teacher turnover and retention. Educational Research Review, 45, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Oberes, M. V. (2022). Effect of organizational commitment on turnover intention of senior high private school teachers in Cebu City, Philippines. Normal Lights, 16(1). https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/normallights/article/view/1714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rafols, B., & Pedroso, J. E. (2025). A survey of administrative support among teachers in rural schools in the Philippines. Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(3). https://journals.eikipub.com/index.php/jetm/article/view/633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shen, J., Leslie, J. M., Spybrook, J. K., & Ma, X. (2012). Are principal background and school processes related to teacher job satisfaction? Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shuls, J. V., & Flores, J. M. (2020). Improving teacher retention through support and development. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 4(1), 1–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1282763.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tosun, A., & Bozkurt Bostancı, A. (2024). The role of administrative support in the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of organizational support and teacher leadership levels. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tran, H., Cunningham, K., Yelverton, V., Osworth, D., & Hardie, S. (2023). How can school leaders retain teachers? The relative importance of different administrative supports for teacher retention in different types of schools. NASSP Bulletin, 107(3), 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365231198858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
• Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
• Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
• Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya