Prediction of Nutrient Requirements in Beef Cattle Using Statistical and Artificial Neural Network Models
Authors
Mathematics, Sanjay Ghodawat Institute, Kolhapur (India)
Mathematics, Hirasugar Institute of Technology, Nidasoshi (India)
Mathematics, Hirasugar Institute of Technology, Nidasoshi (India)
Data Analytics and Mathematical Science, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jain (Deemed-to-be University), Bangalore (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000305
Subject Category: Animal Science
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 4150-4160
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-22
Accepted: 2026-06-28
Published: 2026-07-07
Abstract
This study focused on evaluating the nutrient requirements of beef cattle using data obtained from the Oklahoma State University Extension publication on beef cattle nutrition. The dataset included important production and nutritional variables such as body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI), total digestible nutrients (TDN), net energy for maintenance (NEm), net energy for gain (NEg), crude protein (CP), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P).
Initially, exploratory data analysis was carried out to understand the distribution and variability of the recorded variables. Correlation analysis was then performed to investigate the relationships between growth-related factors, particularly BW and ADG, and the corresponding nutrient requirements of beef cattle.
To estimate nutrient requirements, several predictive modelling approaches were explored, including Simple Linear Regression (SLR), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models employing Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) and Hyperbolic Tangent (Tanh) activation functions. The performance of these models was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²) and Mean Squared Error (MSE).
The findings revealed that Multiple Linear Regression provided the most accurate predictions among the models considered. This suggests that the relationships between growth parameters and nutrient requirements in the dataset are largely linear. The study highlights the potential of statistical modeling as a practical tool for estimating nutrient requirements, thereby supporting more informed feeding strategies and management decisions in beef cattle production.
Keywords
Beef cattle, Nutrient requirement prediction, Multiple linear regression
Downloads
References
1. D. L. Lalman and A. Holder, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (E-974), Oklahoma State University Extension, Stillwater, OK, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 8th Revised Edition, Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to Statistical Learning, 2nd ed., Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. D. C. Montgomery, G. C. Runger, and N. F. Hubele, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 8th ed., Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, J. Neter, and W. Li, Applied Linear Statistical Models, 6th ed., New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. H. Wickham, M. Çetinkaya-Rundel, and G. Grolemund, R for Data Science, 2nd ed., Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. A. Géron, Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, 3rd ed., Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. S. Haykin, Neural Networks and Learning Machines, 3rd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. L. O. Tedeschi, J. P. Muir, H. D. Naumann, and A. B. Norris, “Applications of machine learning in animal nutrition and livestock production,” Animal Frontiers, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 32–41, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. J. C. Lopes, A. F. B. Magalhães, M. E. Carvalho, et al., “Artificial intelligence and precision livestock farming: A review,” Animals, vol. 12, no. 20, p. 2734, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. R. R. White, M. B. Hall, J. L. Firkins, and P. J. Kononoff, “Data-driven approaches for nutrient requirement prediction in livestock systems,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 3148–3161, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluation of the Nutritional Content of Abattoir Waste, Agro By-Products and their Bioavailability to Weaner Pigs.
- Haematology and Serum Biochemistry of Broiler Chicks Fed Mushroom Meal at Varying Levels
- Comparative Assessment of Concentration, Volume and Motility of Semen among Different Breeds of Dairy Bull
- Analysis of the Effectiveness of Animal Welfare Implementation in the Sheep Export Process to Malaysia Via Teluk Nibung Port
- Laying Performance of Quail (Coturnix Coturnix) Influenced By Different Levels of Oyster Shell