Psyche, Archetype, And Ideology: A Comparative Film-Theoretical Analysis of Psychological Aspects in Disney’s Fairy-Tale Characters
Authors
Lecturer – English (GES – Class – II) Government Polytechnic for Girls, Surat, Gujarat (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120800120
Subject Category: Cultural Studies
Volume/Issue: 12/8 | Page No: 1377-1381
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-08-20
Accepted: 2025-08-26
Published: 2025-09-12
Abstract
This paper undertakes a comparative, psychoanalytically informed analysis of Disney’s fairytale adaptations, examining the complex psychological dimensions encoded in their characters and narratives. Using Modern Film Appreciation Theory and psychoanalytic concepts (Freudian drives, Jungian archetypes, narrative desire), the essay explores how characters such as Cinderella, Belle, Elsa, Rapunzel, and Maleficent embody culturally resonant psychological conflicts. The analysis situates these films within broader ideological frameworks, arguing that Disney’s seemingly simple narratives mobilize profound anxieties about gender, family, repression, and individuation. Through close readings and filmic quotations, the essay demonstrates how animation aesthetic, character alignment, and genre convention structure audience identification while naturalizing ideological values about love, selfhood, and social order. Ultimately, the study underscores Disney’s fairy-tales not as mere children’s entertainment but as potent cultural texts negotiating psychic and social contradictions.
Keywords
Psychoanalytic Film Theory, Jungian Archetypes, Freudian Repression and Desire, Disney Fairy-tales, Cultural Ideology, Gender and Identity, Narrative Desire and Individuation
Downloads
References
1. Bettelheim, Bruno. The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales. Vintage, 1976. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Translated by James Strachey, Norton, 1961. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Freud, Sigmund. Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. Translated by Alix Strachey, Norton, 1959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge, 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Jung, Carl Gustav. Psychology and Alchemy. Translated by R.F.C. Hull, Princeton UP, 1953. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Smith, Murray. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford UP, 1995. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Stam, Robert. Film Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Wells, Paul. Understanding Animation. Routledge, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Zipes, Jack. Happily Ever After: Fairy Tales, Children, and the Culture Industry. Routledge, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. Dir. David Hand, Walt Disney Productions, 1937. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Cinderella. Dir. Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson, Hamilton Luske, Walt Disney Productions, 1950. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sleeping Beauty. Dir. Clyde Geronimi, Walt Disney Productions, 1959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Beauty and the Beast. Dir. Gary Trousdale, Kirk Wise, Walt Disney Feature Animation, 1991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Tangled. Dir. Nathan Greno, Byron Howard, Walt Disney Animation Studios, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Frozen. Dir. Chris Buck, Jennifer Lee, Walt Disney Animation Studios, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Maleficent. Dir. Robert Stromberg, Walt Disney Pictures, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]