Geopolitical Shocks as Industrial Opportunity: Firm-Level and Sectoral Evidence from India, 2018–2024

Authors

Dr. Venkatesh K.T

Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Government First Grade College Kodihalli, Bangalore South District-562119 (India)

Ashwath Narayana

Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Government First Grade College Kodihalli, Bangalore South District-562119 (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000330

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 4431-4436

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-21

Accepted: 2026-06-26

Published: 2026-07-09

Abstract

In 2018, an escalation in trade tensions between the United States and China, compounded by global supply chain disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, exerted new structural pressures on multinational firms, necessitating a reassessment of global production geographies. Given its large working-age population, competitive wage levels, and accelerated policy reforms over the past decade (Dutta and Ghosh, 2021; Lall, 2021), India emerged as a potential beneficiary of the "China + 1" diversification paradigm. This paper analyzes the extent to which India has absorbed this industrial opportunity using a secondary data-based analytic framework drawing on official data from the ASI, CMIE, DGCI&S, and RBI. Focusing on the 2018–2024 period, we evaluate five priority sectors: electronics, pharmaceuticals, textiles, chemicals, and automotive components. Employing descriptive trend analysis, comparative sectoral benchmarking against Vietnam and Bangladesh, and firm-level evidence, the findings reveal a heterogeneous pattern of industrial absorption. Electronics manufacturing and pharmaceuticals demonstrated strong export growth and capacity expansion, whereas labour-intensive sectors (textiles and auto components) faced persistent structural competitiveness constraints. By grounding the analysis in "weaponised interdependence" and "developmental state" theories, this paper asserts that India's industrial response has been uneven, shaped by existing capacities, labour market rigidities, and the demand-side focus of its industrial policy. Geopolitical opportunity is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for late industrial transformation.

Keywords

China+1, geopolitical shocks, industrial policy, PLI scheme, trade war, global value chains, India manufacturing, supply chain diversification.

Downloads

References

1. Abraham, V., & Sasikumar, S. K. (2021). Labour cost and export competitiveness in Indian manufacturing. Economic & Political Weekly, 56(12), 44–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialisation. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalisation. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bown, C. P. (2020). US-China trade war tariffs: An up-to-date chart. Peterson Institute for International Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bown, C. P., & Kolb, M. (2023). Trade diversion and supply chain restructuring post-2018. Journal of International Economics, 141, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DGCI&S. (2024). Foreign trade statistics of India. Ministry of Commerce, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dutta, M., & Ghosh, S. (2021). India's manufacturing sector and global value chain integration: Constraints and opportunities. Journal of Asian Economics, 74, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponised interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gereffi, G. (2018). Global value chains and development: Redefining the contours of twenty-first-century capitalism. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Goldar, B., & Banga, R. (2022). FDI in Indian manufacturing: Trends, patterns, and policy implications (Working Paper No. 412). ICRIER. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2022). Trade and investment under policy uncertainty: Theory and firm evidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 189–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Javorcik, B. S. (2024). Reshoring in uncertain times: Evidence from firm-level investment strategies. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 40(1), 18–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kohli, A. (2012). Poverty amid plenty in the new India. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lall, S. (2021). Competitiveness, technology and skills: India in the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malesky, E. J. (2022). The political economy of global value chain integration in Vietnam. World Development, 156, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ministry of Finance. (2022). Economic survey 2021–22. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mukherjee, A., & Bhatt, V. (2022). Trade shocks and firm-level responses in Indian manufacturing: Evidence from CMIE PROWESS. Indian Economic Review, 57(1), 75–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nagaraj, R. (2017). Economic reforms and manufacturing sector growth: Need for reconfiguring the industrial policy framework. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(2), 61–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Niti Aayog. (2023). PLI scheme: Progress and outcomes report 2022–23. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pandey, R., & Mehta, S. (2023). Apple's India pivot: Industrial policy, supply chain geopolitics, and manufacturing FDI. Vivekananda International Foundation Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pharmexcil. (2024). Indian pharmaceutical exports data 2023–24. Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sturgeon, T., & Memedovic, O. (2011). Mapping global value chains: Intermediate goods trade and structural change in the world economy (UNIDO Working Paper No. 5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialisation. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Bank. (2023). Logistics performance index: Connecting to compete. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles