A Lean Construction-Based Evaluation of Prefabrication System Benefits in Modern Construction Projects
Authors
Department of Construction Technology and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built and Natural Environment, Kumasi Technical University (Ghana)
Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Durban University of Technology P. O. Box 1334, Durban, 4000, South Africa / Institute for Sustainable Built Environment, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, EH14 5AS, Edinburgh, UK / Department of Construction Technology and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built and Natural Environment, Kumasi Technical University (Ghana)
Department of Construction Technology and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built and Natural Environment, Kumasi Technical University (Ghana)
Department of Construction Technology and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built and Natural Environment, Kumasi Technical University (Ghana)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000335
Subject Category: Construction Technology
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 4492-4508
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-22
Accepted: 2026-06-27
Published: 2026-07-10
Abstract
This study evaluates the benefits of prefabrication systems in modern construction projects through the lens of lean construction. It addresses persistent inefficiencies in conventional construction, including delays, cost overruns, material waste, quality inconsistencies, safety risks, and poor workflow coordination. A quantitative research methodology, underpinned by a positivist philosophy, was adopted, using a descriptive cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected from 100 built-environment professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry, including contractors, consultants, project managers, quantity surveyors, architects, engineers, site supervisors, and client representatives. A structured questionnaire measured respondents’ perceptions of prefabrication typologies, adoption factors, project delivery roles, performance relationships, and key benefits. The findings reveal that hybrid, modular, structural, and panelised prefabrication systems are the most recognised forms. Technological advancement, labour skills, economic considerations, regulatory frameworks, sustainability concerns, supply chain readiness, risk management, and stakeholder collaboration were identified as major factors influencing adoption. The results further show that prefabrication significantly enhances efficiency, quality, cost minimisation, faster project completion, waste reduction, safety performance, human error reduction, and project predictability. The study concludes that prefabrication supports lean construction principles by reducing waste, improving production flow, maximising value, and promoting sustainable project delivery.
Keywords
Prefabrication systems; Lean construction; Modern construction projects; Project delivery performance; Sustainable construction
Downloads
References
1. Abanda, F.H., Tah, J.H.M., And Cheung, F.K.T., 2017. BIM In Off-Site Manufacturing for Buildings. Journal Of Building Engineering, 14, Pp. 89-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adeyemi, A.B., Ohakawa, T.C., Okwandu, A.C., Iwuanyanwu, O. And Ifechukwu, G.O., 2024. Integrating Modular and Prefabricated Construction Techniques in Affordable Housing: Architectural Design Considerations and Benefits. Comprehensive Research and Reviews in Science and Technology, 2(1), Pp. 10-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adio-Moses, A.D., Adebayo, K. And Obizo, N.R., 2014, January. Green Architecture with Prefab Systems for Sustainable Urban Design. In Proceedings of CIB W107 Conference (611-626). Lagos: CIB W (Vol. 107). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Advances in Construction Technology in The Indian Scenario. Materials Today: Proceedings, 77, Pp. 897-904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Agapiou, A., 2019. Optimising Offsite Manufactured Components in the UK House-Building Sector: Understanding the Legal and Contractual Issues. In Offsite Production and Manufacturing for Innovative Construction (Pp. 449-469). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Agenda, I., 2016, May. Shaping The Future of Construction: A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology. In World Economic Forum (Pp. 11-16). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Apaolaza, U., Lizarralde, A. And Oyarbide-Zubillaga, A., 2020. Modern Project Management Approaches in Uncertainty Environments: A Comparative Study Based on Action Research. Sustainability, 12(24), P. 10542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Araújo, A.G., Carneiro, A.M.P. E Palha, R.P., 2020. Sustainable Construction Management: A Systematic Review of The Literature with Meta-Analysis. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 256, P.120350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Arshad, H. And Zayed, T., 2022. Critical Influencing Factors of Supply Chain Management for Modular Integrated Construction. Automation In Construction, 144, P.104612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Aziz, R.F. And Hafez, S.M., 2013. Applying Lean Thinking in Construction and Performance Improvement. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(4), Pp.679-695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ballard, H.G., 2000. The Last Planner System of Production Control (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Birmingham). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Barriers and Opportunities of Using BIM For Advancing Prefabrication Practice. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(2), Pp. 146-156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Bayeroju, O.F., Sanusi, A.N. And Nwokediegwu, Z.Q.S., 2022. Conceptual Framework for Modular Construction as A Tool for Affordable Housing Provision. Shodhshauryam, International Scientific Refereed Research Journal, 5(4), Pp. 302-322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Benke, K. And Tomkins, B., 2017. Future Food-Production Systems: Vertical Farming and Controlled-Environment Agriculture. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 13(1), Pp.13-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Bertelsen, S., 2004. Lean Construction: Where Are We and How to Proceed. Lean Construction Journal, 1(1), Pp. 46-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Bertram, N., Fuchs, S., Mischke, J., Palter, R., Strube, G., And Woetzel, J., 2019. Modular Construction: From Projects to Products. McKinsey & Company: Capital Projects and Infrastructure, 1(1), Pp. 1-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Boafo, F.E., Kim, J.H. And Kim, J.T., 2016. Performance Of Modular Prefabricated Architecture: Case Study-Based Review and Future Pathways. Sustainability, 8(6), P. 558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Bodaghi, E., 2020. On Impacts of Using Prefabrication on Mitigating the Economic Risk in The Construction Industry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Bonev, M., Wörösch, M., Hauksdóttir, D. And Hvam, L., 2013. Extending Product Modelling Methods for Integrated Product Development. In DS 75-4: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 4: Product, Service and Systems Design, Seoul, Korea, 19-22.08. 2013 (Pp. 219-228). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Boyd, N., Khalfan, M.M. And Maqsood, T., 2013. Off-Site Construction of Apartment Buildings. Journal Of Architectural Engineering, 19(1), Pp.51-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Chen, Y., Okudan, G.E. And Riley, D.R., 2010. Sustainable Performance Criteria for Construction Method Selection in Concrete Buildings. Automation In Construction, 19(2), Pp.235-244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Chen, Y., Zhu, D., Tian, Z. And Guo, Q., 2023. Factors Influencing Construction Time Performance of Prefabricated House Building: A Multi-Case Study. Habitat International, 131, P.102731. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Colledani, M., Tolio, T., Fischer, A., Iung, B., Lanza, G., Schmitt, R. And Váncza, J., 2014. Design And Management of Manufacturing Systems for Production Quality. Cirp Annals, 63(2), Pp.773-796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Construction Using Value Stream Mapping. Journal Of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(8), Pp.782-790. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Fard, M.M., Terouhid, S.A., Kibert, C.J. and Hakim, H. (2015), “Safety concerns related to modular/prefabricated building construction”, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 10–23, doi: 10.1080/17457300.2015.1047865. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Firoozi, A.A., Firoozi, A.A., Firoozi, A.A., Firoozi, A.A., Oyejobi, D.O., Avudaiappan, S. and Flores, E.S. (2024), “Emerging trends in sustainable building materials: Technological innovations, enhanced performance, and future directions”, Results in Engineering, Vol. 24, p. 103521, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Forbes, L.H. And Ahmed, S.M., 2010. Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Gan, X.L., Chang, R.D., Langston, C. And Wen, T., 2019. Exploring The Interactions Among Factors Impeding the Diffusion of Prefabricated Building Technologies: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(3), Pp. 535-553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Ghosh, S. And Hamad, M., 2021. A Model for Measuring Disruption Risks in The Prefabrication Supply Chain. International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 11(2), Pp. 69-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Guerlain, C., Renault, S. And Ferrero, F., 2019. Understanding Construction Logistics in Urban Areas and Lowering Its Environmental Impact: A Focus on Construction Consolidation Centres. Sustainability, 11(21), P. 6118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hamid, Z.A., Hung, F.C. And Rahim, A.H.A., 2017. Retrospective View and Future Initiatives in Industrialised Building Systems (Ibs) And Modernisation, Mechanisation and Industrialisation (Mmi). Modernisation, Mechanisation and Industrialisation of Concrete Structures, Pp. 424-452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. He, R., Li, M., Gan, V.J. And Ma, J., 2021. BIM-Enabled Computerised Design and Digital Fabrication of Industrialised Buildings: A Case Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, p. 123505. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Heaton, R., Martin, H., Chadee, A., Milling, A., Dunne, S. And Borthwick, F., 2022. The Construction Materials Conundrum: Practical Solutions to Address Integrated Supply Chain Complexities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Hong, J., Shen, G.Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B. And Zhang, W., 2018. Barriers To Promoting Prefabricated Construction in China: A Cost–Benefit Analysis. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 172, Pp.649660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Hsiao, H. And Simeonov, P., 2001. Preventing Falls from Roofs: A Critical Review. Ergonomics, 44(5), Pp.537-561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Ibrahim, A., Zayed, T. and Lafhaj, Z. (2025), “Trends and gaps in lean construction practices for construction of megaprojects: A critical review”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 118, pp. 174–193, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.046. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Implementation of Prefabrication in Residential Buildings: The Moderating Role of Incentive Policies. Sustainability, 11(18), P.4827. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Imrie, R. And Street, E., 2011. Architectural Design and Regulation. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Jadhav, O., Minde, P., Yadhav, A. And Gaidhankar, D., 2023. A Review of Emerging Trends & Advances in Construction Technology in The Indian Scenario. Materials Today: Proceedings, 77, Pp.897-904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Karaz, M., Teixeira, J.C. And Rahla, K.M., 2020, September. Construction And Demolition Waste—A Shift Toward Lean Construction and Building Information Modelling. In Sustainability and Automation in Smart Constructions: Proceedings of The International Conference on Automation Innovation in Construction (Ciac-2019), Leiria, Portugal (Pp. 51-58). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Khan, A., Gupta, S. And Gupta, S.K., 2022. Emerging UAV Technology for Disaster Detection, Mitigation, Response, And Preparedness. Journal Of Field Robotics, 39(6), Pp.905-955. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Lambert, K., 2017, October. Risk Management and Liability Considerations. In the 64th Annual Meeting. AACAP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Legmpelos, N., 2013. On-Site Construction Versus Prefabrication (Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Liao, L., And Ai Lin Teo, E., 2018. Organisational Change Perspective on People Management in BIM Implementation in Building Projects. Journal Of Management in Engineering, 34(3), P.04018008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Liker, J.K., And Choi, T.Y., 2004. Building Deep Supplier Relationships. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), Pp. 104-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Liu, G., Li, K., Zhao, D. And Mao, C., 2017. Business Model Innovation and Its Drivers in The Chinese Construction Industry During the Shift to Modular Prefabrication. Journal Of Management in Engineering, 33(3), P.04016051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Lopez, R., Chong, H.Y. And Pereira, C., 2022. Obstacles Preventing the Off-Site Prefabrication of Timber and MEP Services: Qualitative Analyses from Builders and Suppliers in Australia. Buildings, 12(7), P.1044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Lowering Its Environmental Impact: A Focus on Construction Consolidation Centres. Sustainability, 11(21), P.6118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Marfo, B.F., Bondinuba, F.K. and Mewomo, C.M. (2025), “A theoretical framework towards leveraging Internet of Things applications in building energy efficiency”, Property Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 232–255, doi: 10.1108/pm-04-2025-0051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Modular/Prefabricated Building Construction. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 24(1), Pp. 10-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Mostafa, S., Kim, K.P., Tam, V.W. And Rahnamayiezekavat, P., 2020. Exploring The Status, Benefits, Barriers and Opportunities of Using BIM For Advancing Prefabrication Practice. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(2), Pp.146-156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Mostafa, S., Tam, V.W., Dumrak, J. And Mohamed, S., 2020. Leagile Strategies for Optimising the Delivery of Prefabricated House Building Projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(8), Pp. 867-881. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Murie, F., 2007. Building Safety—An International Perspective. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13(1), Pp. 5-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Nath, A.R., Unnikrishnan, S. And Thampi, G., 2019. Waste Detection in The Construction Industry Using Lean Techniques. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Navaratnam, S., Satheeskumar, A., Zhang, G., Nguyen, K., Venkatesan, S. And Poologanathan, K., 2022. The Challenges Confronting the Growth of Sustainable Prefabricated Building Construction in Australia: Construction Industry Views. Journal Of Building Engineering, 48, P. 103935. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Navarro-Rubio, J., Pineda, P. Y García-Martínez, A., 2019. Sustainability, Prefabrication and Building Optimisation Under Different Durability and Re-Using Scenarios: Potential of Dry Precast Structural Connections. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, Pp. 614-628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Nota, G., Nota, F.D., Peluso, D., Y Toro Lazo, A., 2020. Energy Efficiency in Industry 4.0: The Case of Batch Production Processes. Sustainability, 12(16), P. 6631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Salem, O., Solomon, J., Genaidy, A. And Minkarah, I., 2006. Lean Construction: From Theory to Implementation. Journal Of Management in Engineering, 22(4), Pp. 168-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Shibani, Abdussalam, Araz Agha, Dyaa Hassan, Yaseen Al-Hadeethi, And Mou Choudhury. "Effectiveness Of the Modern Methods of Construction in Terms of Cost and Time: A Case Study of The United Kingdom." Journal Of Civil Engineering Research 11, No. 1 (2021): 19-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Tao, C., Chunhui, L., Hui, X., Zhiheng, Z. And Guangyue, W., 2023. A Review of Digital Twin Intelligent Assembly Technology and Application for Complex Mechanical Products. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 127(9), Pp. 4013-4033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Tavares, V., Calheiros, C.S.C., Martins, I.B., Maia, J., Tsikaloudaki, K., Fonseca, M., Marchesi, M., et al. (2024), “Modularity and prefabrication”, Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, pp. 215–256, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Thomsen, R.F., 2022. Use Of Prefabricated Building Construction Method to Reduce Construction Waste and Global Warming Potential from Residential Buildings in Denmark. Building Energy Design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Tumminia, F. Guarino, S. Longo, M. Ferraro, M. Cellura, And V. Antonucci, “Life Cycle Energy Performances and Environmental Impacts of a Prefabricated Building Module,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 92, Pp. 272–283, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Wasim, M., Vaz Serra, P. And Ngo, T.D., 2022. Design For Manufacturing and Assembly for Sustainable, Quick and Cost-Effective Prefabricated Construction–A Review. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), Pp. 3014-3022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Wu, Z., Luo, L., Li, H., Wang, Y., Bi, G. And Antwi-Afari, M.F., 2021. An Analysis on Promoting Prefabrication Implementation in the Construction Industry Towards Sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), P.11493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Yang, H., 2020, December. Performance Analysis of Semi-Rigid Connections in Prefabricated High-Rise Steel Structures. In Structures (Vol. 28, Pp. 837-846). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Yang, Y., Pan, M., Pan, W. And Zhang, Z., 2021. Sources of Uncertainty in Offsite Logistics of Modular Construction for High-Rise Building Projects. Journal Of Management in Engineering, 37(3), P.04021011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Yu, H., Tweed, T., Al-Hussein, M. And Nasseri, R., 2009. Development Of Lean Model for House Construction Using Value Stream Mapping. Journal Of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(8), Pp.782-790. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Yuan, M., Li, Z., Li, X., Luo, X., Yin, X. And Cai, J., 2023. Proposing A Multifaceted Model for Adopting Prefabricated Construction Technology in The Construction Industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(2), Pp.755-786. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Zhao, Y., Liu, L. And Yu, M., 2023. Comparison And Analysis of Carbon Emissions of Traditional, Prefabricated, And Green Material Buildings in the Materialisation Stage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 406, p. 137152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Zhong, R.Y., Peng, Y., Xue, F., Fang, J., Zou, W., Luo, H., Ng, S.T., Lu, W., Shen, G.Q. And Huang, G.Q., 2017. Prefabricated Construction Enabled by the Internet of Things. Automation In Construction, 76, Pp.59-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Zhou J, Qin Y, Fang S. Impacts of Consumers and Real Estate Enterprises on The Implementation of Prefabrication in Residential Buildings: The Moderating Role of Incentive Policies. Sustainability. 2019 Sep 4;11(18):4827. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Zolghadr, A., 2023. Innovative Offsite Construction Uptake in The Housebuilding Sector: A Systemic Approach to Economic Justifiability for Volume Builders (Doctoral Dissertation, RMIT University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Zolghadr, A., Gharaie, E. And Naderpajouh, N., 2022. Barriers To Innovation in The Housing Sector: Economic Justifiability of Offsite Construction for Housebuilders. Journal Of Building Engineering, 52, P.104490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]