Canaan as a Balance Sheet Item: Valuing a Political Promise That Outlasted Four Presidential Campaigns in Kenya

Authors

Lilian Mbatha

The Cooperative University of Kenya, School of Business and Economic Studies (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000379

Subject Category: FINANCE

Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 5102-5113

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-22

Accepted: 2026-06-28

Published: 2026-07-11

Abstract

In financial accounting, intangible assets derive their value from stakeholder recognition rather than physical substance. Using this idea as an analytical lens, this study examines how the Canaan metaphor, the biblical Promised Land invoked by the Late Rt. Hon. Raila Amolo Odinga became one of the most enduring symbolic political narratives in Kenya's democratic history. Across four presidential campaigns (1997–2017) and nearly three decades of public life, the Canaan promise was never realized through electoral victory, yet its symbolic significance continued to grow. Drawing on accounting theory, particularly intangible asset valuation, stakeholder theory, and brand equity, this study develops and introduces the Political Asset Valuation Framework (PAVF) as an analytical framework for examining rhetorical intensity, stakeholder loyalty, narrative resilience within political communication. The study is anchored on the biblical Joshua narrative to explain how delayed fulfilment can strengthen symbolic political meaning over time. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed, combining quantitative content analysis, qualitative rhetorical analysis, and longitudinal voter sentiment mapping. A corpus of 1,847 political texts published between 1997 and 2022 was analysed alongside evidence from 14 Afrobarometer survey rounds, 6 IPSOS opinion polls, and selected campaign speeches. The coding process achieved a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.81 (p < .001), indicating strong inter-coder reliability. Findings show that references to Canaan increased from 3.2 mentions per 1,000 words in 1997 to 11.7 mentions per 1,000 words in 2017, representing a 266% increase in symbolic deployment. Public trust in Odinga's political vision remained resilient, increasing from 58% after the 2007 election to 61% after the 2017 election. The Joshua narrative emerged as the dominant theme, presenting the Canaan vision as an enduring promise that strengthened public confidence and sustained political commitment across successive election cycles. Regression analysis showed a positive association between rhetorical intensity and voter-base retention (β = 0.43, SE = 0.07, p < .001), although the relationship is interpreted as associative rather than causal. Following the 2018 Handshake, the Canaan metaphor evolved from a personalized opposition narrative into a broader democratic discourse, reflecting a symbolic shift in political meaning. The study concludes that, when viewed through an accounting lens, the Canaan metaphor displayed characteristics similar to an appreciating intangible asset whose symbolic value persisted over time. Rather than proposing the recognition of political narratives as financial assets, the Political Asset Valuation Framework (PAVF) provides an interdisciplinary framework for analyzing how political promises create, sustain, and transform stakeholder value. The findings extend the application of accounting concepts to political communication and offer useful insights for researchers, political communication scholars, governance practitioners, and policymakers seeking to understand how symbolic narratives shape public trust, legitimacy, and democratic engagement.

Keywords

Political communication; Symbolic capital; Democratic imagination

Downloads

References

1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alubala, A., Masanja, V., & Wachira, F. (2026). From media relations to networked contestation: Rethinking political communication in Kenya's hybrid media system. Journal of Marketing and Communication. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t7089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barasa, M. N., Moinani, A. M., & Telewa, V. K. (2023). Conceptualising nationalism, revolution and opposition in political discourse by use of metaphors: The case of Raila Odinga in Kenya. Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 2(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.51317/jll.v2i1.347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. De Saint Laurent, C., Obradović, S., & Carriere, K. (2024). Collective memories and social representations in political identity formation. Culture & Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). IAS 38 Intangible Assets. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2024). International Accounting Standard 38 (IAS 38): Intangible Assets. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The International <IR> framework. IIRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2021). International <IR> framework. IIRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Odidi, S., & Imbali, M. (2024). Issue-based politics in Kenya: Assessing the underlying factors, progress made, and barriers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.801066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ochieng, E. E. (2022). Symbolic politics in Kenya: An analysis of the major political parties' symbols since independence and their contribution to the general elections. Journal of Politics and International Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.51317/jpis.v1i1.249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ogenga, F., & Gamez, S. (2025). “Hustlers versus dynasties”: Social media narratives, the 2022 presidential election in Kenya and digital peacebuilding. International Communication Gazette. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166251379568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Samoei, K. C., & Koech, P. K. (2025). The politics of performative dialogue: A critical analysis of Kenya's democratic process, 1990–2024. International Journal of Geopolitics and Governance, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37284/ijgg.4.1.3744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action: Comparing social movement research across cultures (pp. 197–217). JAI Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–613. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Supreme Court of Kenya. (2017a). Raila Amolo Odinga & another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others; Presidential Petition No. 1 of 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Supreme Court of Kenya. (2017b). Raila Amolo Odinga & another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others; Presidential Petition No. 1 of 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UNCTAD. (2012). Intangible assets in global value chains. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wabende, K. (2021). Imagining the Kenyan Canaan dream journey in cyber space. Tydskrif vir Letterkunde, 58(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.17159/tl.v58i1.8391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles