Mediating Analysis of Heuristic Behaviour between Neurofinance and Investment Decision-Making of Small and Medium Entrepreneurs: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Authors
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Kelantan, (Malaysia)
Wan Zakiyatussariroh Wan Husin
Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang (Malaysia)
Department of Neuro, Universiti Sains Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000525
Subject Category: FINANCE
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 6146-6155
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-04
Accepted: 2026-07-10
Published: 2026-07-22
Abstract
Entrepreneurs’ behavioural biases and emotions play an important role in shaping the rationality and quality of investment decision-making. Although behavioural biases are often assumed to influence financial choices, their direct effect on entrepreneurial performance and investment outcomes may vary depending on the psychological condition of the entrepreneur. Emotions, particularly positive and negative emotions, are closely associated with investment achievement because they can influence confidence, risk perception, judgment, and decision consistency. This paper aims to analyse the mediating effect of heuristic behaviour between neuro function, represented by emotion, and investment decision-making among entrepreneurs. A field experiment was conducted involving forty-two entrepreneurs to measure their emotional responses, investment decision-making behaviour, and heuristic tendencies. Data were collected using three structured sets of questionnaires designed to capture positive emotion, negative emotion, heuristic behaviour, and the quality of investment decisions. The collected data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and General Linear Regression to examine the direct and indirect relationships among the variables. The findings revealed a significant effect of emotion on investment decision-making. Specifically, negative emotion was found to significantly influence poor investment decisions, both directly and indirectly through heuristic behaviour. However, positive emotion did not show a significant direct or indirect effect on investment decision-making through heuristic behaviour. Based on the analysis, a neuro-behavioural investment decision-making model was developed. This model provides useful insights for entrepreneurs by helping them recognise emotional influences, reduce decision-making errors, and improve emotional control during investment activities. Future research is recommended to examine heuristic behaviour as a moderating variable, as heuristic behaviour only partially mediates the relationship between emotion and investment decision-making.
Keywords
Emotion, Entrepreneur, Heuristic Behaviour, Investment Decision-Making
Downloads
References
1. Adobor, H. (2020). Entrepreneurial failure in agribusiness: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2019-0131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015). Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baker, H. K., & Nofsinger, J. R. (2011). Behavioral Finance: Investors, Corporations, and Markets. In Behavioral Finance: Investors, Corporations, and Markets. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118258415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Baker, M., Ruback, R. S., & Wurgler, J. (2004). Handbook in Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance. Handbook in Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rational heuristics: The “simple rules” that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Costa, P. L., Ferreira, J. J., & Torres de Oliveira, R. (2023). From entrepreneurial failure to re-entry. Journal of Business Research, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113699 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. del Campo, C., Pauser, S., Steiner, E., & Vetschera, R. (2016). Decision making styles and the use of heuristics in decision making. Journal of Business Economics, 86(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0811-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dhami, S. (2019). The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis : Volume I: Behavioral Economics of Risk, Uncertainty, and Ambiguity. In Oxford University Press (Vol. 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. aDhami, S., al-Nowaihi, A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Heuristics and Public Policy: Decision-making Under Bounded Rationality. Studies in Microeconomics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022219832148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. bDhami, S., Wei, M., & al-Nowaihi, A. (2019). Public goods games and psychological utility: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dunn, L., & Hoegg, J. (2014). The impact of fear on emotional brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/675377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Frydman, C., & Camerer, C. F. (2016). The Psychology and Neuroscience of Financial Decision Making. In Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Vol. 20, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gal, P., Mrva, M., & Meško, M. (2013). Heuristics, biases and traps in managerial decision making. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7). https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361072117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gerlach-Kristen, P., O’Connell, B., & O’Toole, C. (2015). Do credit constraints affect SME investment and employment? Economic and Social Review, 46(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hayes, A. F. (2018). The PROCESS Macro for SPSS and SAS version 3.0 [Computer software]. Retrieved from Afhayes. Com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hua, F., & Wang, J. (2018). How investor sentiment impacts financial decision-making behavior: From a cognitive neuroscience perspective. NeuroQuantology, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ismail, N. (2020). Experimental analysis of neurofinance towards heuristics behaviour on financial decision making: case of Small-Medium Entrepreneurs (SMEs). Universiti Malaysia Kelantan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ismail, N., Nik Muhammad, N. M., Wan Husin, W. Z., & Abd Halim, A. I. (2021). Heuristic Behavior as Mediating Effect of Neurofinance and Entrepreneur’s Financial Decision-Making: Evidence of Pretest–Posttest Experiment. In Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics (Vol. 20). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85304-4_15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Jain, R., Jain, P., & Jain, C. (2015). Behavioral Biases in the Decision Making of Individual Investors. The IUP Journal of Management Research, 14(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lawless, M., O. C., & S. R. (2018). Estimating an SME investment gap and the contribution of financing frictions (No. 589; ESRI Working Paper). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. McDermott, R. (2016). Risk-Taking in International Politics. In Risk-Taking in International Politics. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Muhammad, N. M. N., Jantan, M., & Taib, F. M. (2009). Environmental scanning and investment decision quality: Information processing perspective. Management Research News, 32(12). https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170911006885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Newkirk, T. (2014). Draw me a word, write me a picture. Writing about Writing: A College Reader, 76–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Nicolas, T. (2022). Short-term financial constraints and SMEs’ investment decision: evidence from the working capital channel. Small Business Economics, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00488-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Nigam, R. M., Srivastava, S., & Banwet, D. K. (2018). Behavioral mediators of financial decision making – a state-of-art literature review. Review of Behavioral Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2016-0047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Nyamute, W. I. (2016). Investor Behaviour, Investor Demographic Characteristics, Investment Style and Individual Investor Portfolio Performance at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sahi, S. K. (2012). Neurofinance and investment behaviour. In Studies in Economics and Finance (Vol. 29, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1108/10867371211266900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, 89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (2020). Happy and Mindless, But Sad and Smart? The Impact of Affective States on Analytic Reasoning. In Emotion and Social Judgments. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003058731-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Seloni, G., Kusrohmaniah, S., & Lufityanto, G. (2023). The perils of acting rashly: Risk-taking propensity impeding emotion-based learning in entrepreneurs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-022-00325-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Srivastava, M., Sharma, G. D., & Srivastava, A. K. (2019). Human brain and financial behavior: a neurofinance perspective. In International Journal of Ethics and Systems (Vol. 35, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-02-2019-0036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tarditi, C., Hahnel, U. J. J., Jeanmonod, N., Sander, D., & Brosch, T. (2020). Affective Dilemmas: The Impact of Trait Affect and State Emotion on Sustainable Consumption Decisions in a Social Dilemma Task. Environment and Behavior, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518787590 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Torga, E. M. M. F., Barbosa, F. V., De Pádua Carrieri, A., Ferreira, B. P., & Yoshimatsu, M. H. (2018). Behavioral finance and games: Simulations in the academic environment. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 29(77). https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201804830 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Sekaran U., & Bougie R. (2016). Research Method for Business (A Skill Building Approach). United States: John Wiley & Sons Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Wang, Y. (2024). Intuitive Decision-making and Gut Feeling. In Leaders’ Decision Making and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-386-620241011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Wong, A., Holmes, S., & Schaper, M. T. (2018). How do small business owners actually make their financial decisions? Understanding SME financial behaviour using a case-based approach. Small Enterprise Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2018.1428909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Yang, J. (2017). An empirical study of Meta-Cognition in English writing course. Proceedings of the Sixth Northeast Asia International Symposium on Language, Literature and Translation International, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Zhao, R., & Zhang, X. (2019). Analysis of Investment Decisions of SMEs. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmete-19.2019.102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Financial Technology (Fintech): Current Research at The Cutting Edge
- Reforming Corporate Governance in Malaysia to Address Fraudulent Financial Reporting Cases
- Stock Market Efficiency and Economic Diversification in Nigeria and South Africa
- Financial Stability and Financial Performance of Small and Medium Tiered Deposit Taking Savings and Credit Cooperatives in Kenya.
- Regulator Sandboxes for DeFi: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Effectiveness in the EU, US, and Asia Pacific