Synthetic Media and Its Misuse in India: A Critical Legal Analysis of The Regulatory Framework, Judicial Response, and The Path Forward

The proliferation of synthetic media—commonly referred to as "deepfakes"—represents one of the most consequential technological disruptions of the twenty-first century, with India emerging as both a major producer and victim of AI-generated deceptive content. This article presents the first comprehensive legal analysis of India's regulatory response to synthetic media misuse, examining the recently notified Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, alongside the existing statutory framework under the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and allied legislation. Drawing upon empirical data from government reports, market research, and judicial precedents, this study evaluates the adequacy of India's legal architecture in addressing the multifaceted harms of deepfakes, including non-consensual intimate imagery, electoral manipulation, financial fraud, and reputational damage. The article argues that while the IT Rules 2026 represent a watershed moment in Indian digital governance—featuring the world's most aggressive takedown timeline of three hours and mandatory 10% visual labelling requirements—significant gaps persist in enforcement capacity, cross-border jurisdiction, and the protection of ordinary citizens who lack the resources of celebrity litigants. Through comparative analysis with the European Union's AI Act, China's deepfake provisions, and Singapore's POFMA framework, this article proposes a multi-pronged reform agenda encompassing a dedicated Synthetic Media Act, enhanced judicial training, public-private detection partnerships, and constitutional safeguards for free expression.

Synthetic Media, Deepfakes, Information Technology Act, 2000, IT Rules 2026, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery, Digital Governance, AI Regulation, Platform Accountability.

1. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, Rule 2(1)(wa) (India). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ian Goodfellow et al., Generative Adversarial Networks, 3 COMM. ACM 1392 (2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Grand View Research, Deepfake AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fortune Business Insights, Deepfake Technology Market Size, Share | Growth Report [2034] (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. World Economic Forum, Global Risks Report 2024 (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Sumsub, Global Deepfake Fraud Report (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. McAfee, AI Voice Scam Survey: India Results (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Industry regulatory submissions to MeitY (2024) (on file with author). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Indian Telecom Services Performance Indicators (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Information Technology Act, 2000, § 79 (India). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (India). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026, G.S.R. 120(E) (India). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. MeitY, Frequently Asked Questions on IT Rules, 2021 (Amendment) (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Amitabh Bachchan v. Rajat Nagi, CS (COMM) 493/2022 (Delhi High Court). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vaish Law Associates, India IT Rules Before and After Amendment & AI-Generated Content (Feb. 10, 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Market.us, Deepfake Detection Market Size | CAGR of 47.6% (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, Digital Services Act (2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Provisions on the Management of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services (China), effective Jan. 10, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act, 2019 (Singapore). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Human Rights Watch, Singapore's POFMA: A Threat to Free Expression (2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. IISc Bengaluru and Infibeam Partner for Deepfake Detection, THE HINDU (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. European Commission, Check. Recheck. Vote. Campaign (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mondaq, India's New Deepfake Regulation: MeitY Notifies Amendments (Feb. 16, 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark