Streamlining Local Content Verification Through an Integrated Information System for Framework Contract Schemes
Authors
Universitas Gunadarma (Indonesia)
Universitas Gunadarma (Indonesia)
Universitas Gunadarma (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1313CS022
Subject Category: Computer Science
Volume/Issue: 13/13 | Page No: 284-296
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-17
Accepted: 2026-07-22
Published: 2026-07-30
Abstract
The verification process of Local Content Requirements (Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri/TKDN) for services under the Framework Contract scheme involves multiple actors, interconnected business process stages, and various related documents, making information management increasingly complex when conducted without an integrated information system. Unlike conventional verification mechanisms, the Framework Contract scheme is characterized by hierarchical relationships among a Framework Contract, multiple Work Orders, partner companies, verification activities, and certificate issuance. These characteristics increase the complexity of data management, document traceability, and coordination among actors, thereby requiring an information system approach capable of integrating the entire business process. This study aims to develop an information system that supports the digitalization of the TKDN service verification process under the Framework Contract scheme through integrated business process management. The study employed an applied research approach using the Research and Development (R&D) method, which included data collection through observation, interviews, and document review, followed by requirements analysis, system design, system development, and functional validation using Black Box Testing. The developed system integrates the management of Framework Contracts, Work Orders, partner companies, surveyor assignments, survey implementation, verification report preparation, Quality Control review, and certificate issuance within a single integrated information platform. The testing results indicate that all core system functions operated in accordance with operational requirements and were able to support a more structured, integrated, and traceable verification process. In addition to improving data consistency and coordination among actors, the system also supports centralized document management, thereby reducing the potential for information duplication during the verification process. This study provides a practical contribution through the digitalization of the TKDN service verification process and an academic contribution through a business process–based information system model that integrates hierarchical relationships among entities within the Framework Contract scheme. The proposed model is expected to serve as a reference for the development of information systems in other verification and certification processes with similar business process characteristics.
Keywords
Information System; Local Content Verification; Framework Contract; Business Process Digitalization; Verification.
Downloads
References
1. Agarwal, S. (2026). Contract2Plan: Verified Contract-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Optimization for BOM-Aware Procurement and Multi-Echelon Inventory Planning. ArXiv, abs/2601.06164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2601.06164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Agrawal, T., Angelis, J. J., Khilji, W. A., Kalaiarasan, R., & Wiktorsson, M. (2022). Demonstration of a blockchain-based framework using smart contracts for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Production Research, 61, 1497-1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2039413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Agrawal, T., Kumar, V., Pal, R., Wang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Blockchain-based framework for supply chain traceability: A case example of textile and clothing industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, 107130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Akaba, T. I., Norta, A., Udokwu, C., & Draheim, D. (2020). A Framework for the Adoption of Blockchain-Based e-Procurement Systems in the Public Sector. Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology, 12066, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chinaei, M. H., Gharakheili, H. H., & Sivaraman, V. (2020). Optimal Witnessing of Healthcare IoT Data Using Blockchain Logging Contract. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8, 10117-10130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3051433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ezzati, S. M., Alizadeh, R., & Jokar, M. R. A. (2024). Efficiency and Transparency in Supplier Performance Evaluation: A Blockchain-Powered Smart Contract Solution. IEEE Access, 12, 168370-168392. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3462896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Faccia, A., & Petratos, P. (2021). Blockchain, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Accounting Information Systems (AIS): Research on e-Procurement and System Integration. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Guarnizo, J., & Szalachowski, P. (2018). PDFS: Practical Data Feed Service for Smart Contracts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29959-0_37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Guo, L., Liu, Q., Shi, K., Gao, Y., Luo, J.-N., & Chen, J. (2021). A Blockchain-Driven Electronic Contract Management System for Commodity Procurement in Electronic Power Industry. IEEE Access, 9, 9473-9480. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049562 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Iders-Bankovs, M., Politika, V., Pundure, J., Jarvis, M., & Ziemelis, M. (2025). Public Procurement in the Age of AI: Challenges and Opportunities. Engineering for Rural Development. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2025.24.TF198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kocha, J. (2025). Vendor Payment Modernization Frameworks: Blockchain-Enabled Smart Contracts to Eliminate Service Delays in Assistive Tech Procurement. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/volume07issue07-02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Nanayakkara, S., Perera, S., Senaratne, S., Weerasuriya, G. T., & Bandara, H. (2021). Blockchain and Smart Contracts: A Solution for Payment Issues in Construction Supply Chains. Informatics, 8, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Omar, I. A., Jayaraman, R., Debe, M. S., Salah, K., Yaqoob, I., & Omar, M. A. (2021). Automating Procurement Contracts in the Healthcare Supply Chain Using Blockchain Smart Contracts. IEEE Access, 9, 37397-37409. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Raghavendra, B., & Vemula, S. (2025). Enabling Public Accountability through ERP: Designing Transparent Procurement Systems for Local Governments. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i59s.12838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Sutisna, N., & Rahman, T. K. A. (2025). Web-Based E-Procurement Development in Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD): An R&D Approach. International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.59395/ijadis.v6i1.1374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Van Groesen, W., & Pauwels, P. (2022). Tracking Prefabricated Assets and Compliance Using Quick Response (QR) Codes, Blockchain and Smart Contract Technology. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Wang, K., Zipperle, M., Becherer, M., Gottwalt, F., & Zhang, Y. (2020). An AI-Based Automated Continuous Compliance Awareness Framework (CoCAF) for Procurement Auditing. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc4030023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Weingärtner, T., Batista, D., Köchli, S., & Voutat, G. (2021). Prototyping a Smart Contract Based Public Procurement to Fight Corruption. Computers, 10(7), 85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10070085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Wilhelm, M. M., & Villena, V. H. (2021). Cascading Sustainability in Multi-tier Supply Chains: When Do Chinese Suppliers Adopt Sustainable Procurement? Production and Operations Management, 30, 4198-4218. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
- Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
- Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
- Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet