Assessment Of Heritage Site Management in the City of Manila: Basis for Heritage Site Management Enhancement Framework

Authors

Celia E. Carino, Ed. D

Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science & Technology (EARIST-CAVITE) Graduate School- Ed.D Program (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000120

Subject Category: Research

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 1632-1644

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-13

Accepted: 2026-07-19

Published: 2026-07-31

Abstract

Heritage sites serve as important cultural assets that preserve historical identity, promote education, and contribute to sustainable tourism and local economic development. Despite ongoing conservation initiatives, many heritage sites in the City of Manila continue to face challenges stemming from rapid urbanization, rising tourist arrivals, environmental degradation, commercialization, and limited stakeholder participation. This study assessed heritage site management in selected heritage sites in the City of Manila as perceived by site management employees, local government unit officials, community residents, and local visitors. Specifically, it examined respondents' assessments of heritage site management, identified significant differences among stakeholder groups, and identified the challenges encountered in managing these sites. The study employed a descriptive-comparative research design using a researcher-developed questionnaire administered to sixty (60) respondents. Data were analyzed using percentage, weighted mean, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results indicated that heritage site management was generally assessed as Highly Effective, reflecting favorable practices in heritage conservation, visitor management, cultural preservation, stakeholder participation, sustainability initiatives, and site maintenance. However, significant differences were observed among selected respondent groups regarding certain management dimensions, suggesting variations in stakeholder experiences and expectations. Respondents also identified challenges related to infrastructure maintenance, overcrowding, environmental management, funding limitations, and community participation. Based on these findings, a Heritage Site Management Enhancement Framework was developed to strengthen conservation efforts, improve visitor experiences, enhance stakeholder collaboration, and promote sustainable cultural tourism in the City of Manila.

Keywords

heritage site management, cultural heritage, sustainable tourism, heritage conservation, visitor management, Manila, stakeholder participation

Downloads

References

1. Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B., & Tunbridge, J. E. (2020). Pluralising pasts: Heritage, identity and place in multicultural societies. Pluto Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asian Development Bank. (2023). Asian development outlook 2023: Investing in sustainable development. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandarin, F., & van Oers, R. (2019). The historic urban landscape: Managing heritage in an urban century. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2021). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings for sustainable development. Structural Survey, 39(2), 181–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourism area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 5–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Tourism. (2023). National Tourism Development Plan 2023–2028. Department of Tourism. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Feilden, B. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1998). Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites (2nd ed.). ICCROM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Global Sustainable Tourism Council. (2023). GSTC destination criteria version 2.0. Global Sustainable Tourism Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2021). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. ICOMOS. (2020). Guidance on heritage impact assessments for cultural world heritage properties. International Council on Monuments and Sites. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. ICOMOS. (2023). ICOMOS annual report 2023. International Council on Monuments and Sites. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jokilehto, J. (2019). A history of architectural conservation. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Leask, A. (2021). Managing visitor attractions (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mason, P. (2021). Tourism impacts, planning and management (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. National Commission for Culture and the Arts. (2023). Philippine cultural heritage conservation framework. NCCA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. National Museum of the Philippines. (2024). National heritage conservation initiatives report. National Museum of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). OECD tourism trends and policies 2022. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Poria, Y., Butler, R., & Airey, D. (2020). Tourism, heritage, and visitor interpretation. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15(4), 365–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Republic Act No. 10066. (2009). National Cultural Heritage Act of 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Republic Act No. 9593. (2009). Tourism Act of 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Richards, G. (2021). Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shackley, M. (2020). Visitor management: Case studies from World Heritage Sites. Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Smith, M. K. (2021). Issues in cultural tourism studies (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Timothy, D. J. (2021). Cultural heritage and tourism: An introduction. Channel View Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2020). Heritage tourism (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNESCO. (2021). World heritage sustainable tourism toolkit. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNESCO. (2023). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UNESCO. (2024). Global education and culture report 2024. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2022). International tourism highlights 2022 edition. UNWTO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2023). Tourism for sustainable development goals. UNWTO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. World Bank. (2024). World development report 2024: Learning for development. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. World Travel & Tourism Council. (2023). Economic impact report 2023. WTTC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yung, E. H. K., & Chan, E. H. W. (2020). Critical social sustainability factors in urban conservation. Habitat International, 96, 102107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zhang, C., Fyall, A., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Sustainable heritage tourism management and visitor satisfaction: A systematic review. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(2), 245–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zulueta, F. M., & Reyes, A. P. (2024). Heritage site management and sustainable tourism development in selected Philippine historical destinations. Philippine Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 9(1), 31–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles