Deep Learning Applications in Indian Agricultural Markets: A Systematic Review

Agricultural markets in India are increasingly characterized by price volatility, fragmented supply chains, information asymmetry, climate uncertainty, and rapidly changing consumer demand, creating significant challenges for farmers, policymakers, and market stakeholders. Conventional statistical and econometric forecasting methods often struggle to capture the complex nonlinear relationships inherent in agricultural market systems. In recent years, deep learning has emerged as a transformative technology capable of improving agricultural market intelligence through advanced prediction, classification, optimization, and decision-support capabilities. This study presents a systematic review of the literature on deep learning applications in Indian agricultural markets with the objective of synthesizing current knowledge, identifying research trends, evaluating methodological approaches, and highlighting future research opportunities. The review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) framework to ensure a transparent and rigorous literature selection process. Relevant studies published between 2015 and 2026 were identified through major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, using predefined search strategies and eligibility criteria. The selected literature was systematically analyzed according to application domains, deep learning architectures, data sources, evaluation methodologies, implementation challenges, and policy implications.
The review reveals that deep learning models, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), Transformer-based architectures, and hybrid deep learning models, consistently outperform conventional forecasting approaches in agricultural price prediction, demand estimation, crop yield forecasting, supply chain optimization, market intelligence, and risk assessment. However, widespread implementation in India remains constrained by fragmented datasets, inconsistent data quality, limited digital infrastructure, computational resource requirements, model interpretability concerns, and insufficient institutional coordination. The review further identifies significant research gaps, including the limited adoption of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), multimodal learning, graph neural networks, federated learning, and real-time decision-support systems tailored to Indian agricultural markets.
This review contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive synthesis of deep learning applications in the Indian agricultural context, critically evaluating existing research, and proposing a future research agenda emphasizing standardized agricultural data ecosystems, explainable and trustworthy artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary collaboration, and evidence-based policy interventions. The findings offer valuable guidance for researchers, policymakers, agribusiness organizations, and technology developers seeking to accelerate the adoption of intelligent, data-driven agricultural market management systems that enhance market efficiency, strengthen food security, and promote sustainable agricultural development in India.

Deep Learning; Agricultural Markets; India; Artificial Intelligence; Price Forecasting

1. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., et al. (2016). TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. https://tensorflow.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdar, M., et al. (2023). A review of explainable artificial intelligence in deep learning. Information Fusion, 99, 101896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adjemian, M., Bruno, V., & Robe, M. (2020). Incorporating uncertainty into USDA commodity price forecasts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 102(2), 696–712. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahumada, H., & Cornejo, M. (2016). Forecasting food prices: The case of corn, soybeans and wheat. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(3), 838–848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Akkem, Y., Biswas, S., & Varanasi, A. (2023). Smart farming using artificial intelligence: A review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 120, 105899. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ariyo, A. A., Adewumi, A. O., & Ayo, C. K. (2014). Stock price prediction using the ARIMA model. Proceedings of the UKSim-AMSS International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., et al. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 82, 82–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2015). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bishop, C. M., & Bishop, H. (2024). Deep Learning: Foundations and Concepts. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Boiko, O., Medviediev, O., & Kyselov, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence in agriculture: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Brownlee, J. (2018). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting. Machine Learning Mastery. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chatfield, C. (2001). Time-Series Forecasting. Chapman & Hall/CRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chollet, F. (2021). Deep Learning with Python (2nd ed.). Manning Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 4171–4186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Agriculture: Policy Guidance for Sustainable Food Systems. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2672–2680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Google DeepMind. (2024). Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gouel, C., Gautam, M., & Martin, W. (2016). Managing food price volatility in a large open country: The case of wheat in India. Oxford Economic Papers, 68(3), 811–835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015). Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Higham, C. F., & Higham, D. J. (2018). Deep learning: An introduction for applied mathematicians. SIAM Review, 61(4), 860–891. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). The Cochrane Collaboration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Howard, J., & Gugger, S. (2020). Deep Learning for Coders with fastai and PyTorch. O'Reilly Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.). OTexts. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Indian Council of Agricultural Research. (2022). Annual Report 2021–22. ICAR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Indian Council of Agricultural Research. (2023). Annual Report 2022–23. ICAR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., et al. (2023). A survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Khan, M. A., et al. (2024). Explainable artificial intelligence in smart agriculture: Current status and future research directions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Khaki, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Crop yield prediction using deep neural networks in precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 163, 104859. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014). Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. E. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Li, X., et al. (2024). Transformer-based deep learning models for agricultural forecasting: A comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Li, Y., Tarlow, D., Brockschmidt, M., & Zemel, R. (2016). Gated graph sequence neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The M4 forecasting competition: Results, findings, conclusion and way forward. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(1), 54–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Manogna, R. L. (2021). Forecasting spot prices of agricultural commodities in India: Application of deep learning models. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 28(1), 72–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Manogna, R. L., Dharmaji, V., & Sarang, S. (2025). Enhancing agricultural commodity price forecasting with deep learning. Scientific Reports, 15, 20903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Minhas, A., & Mehta, P. (2022). Machine learning approaches for agricultural commodity price forecasting: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 8, 100297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare. (2018). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2018. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare. (2020). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2020. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare. (2021). Annual Report 2020–21. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare. (2022). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2022. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare. (2024). Digital Agriculture Mission: Framework and Implementation Strategy. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). BMJ, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mosa, A., et al. (2024). Generative AI applications in precision agriculture: Opportunities and challenges. Smart Agricultural Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. (2024). Rural Infrastructure and Digital Agriculture Report. NABARD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. National Commission on Farmers. (2006). Serving Farmers and Saving Farming: Final Report. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. National Informatics Centre. (2019). AGMARKNET: Agricultural Marketing Information System. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. National Informatics Centre. (2023). AGMARKNET User Manual. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. National Sample Survey Office. (2014). Key Indicators of Situation of Agricultural Households in India. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. NITI Aayog. (2018). National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. NITI Aayog. (2021). Responsible AI for All: Operationalizing Principles for Responsible AI. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., et al. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 8024–8035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Paul, R. K., Sinha, K., Gurung, B., & Bhar, L. M. (2014). Statistical models for agricultural commodity price forecasting in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(11), 1401–1405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1532–1543. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Rakshit, D., Paul, R. K., & Panwar, S. (2021). Asymmetric price volatility of onion in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(2), 245–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Ras, G., Xie, N., van Gerven, M., & Doran, D. (2020). Explainable deep learning: A field guide for the uninitiated. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 73, 329–397. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) (pp. 234–241). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Sejnowski, T. J. (2020). The unreasonable effectiveness of deep learning in artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48), 30033–30038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017). Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Silva, R., Santos, M., & Oliveira, L. (2024). Exploring current trends in agricultural commodities forecasting methods through text mining: Developments in statistical and artificial intelligence methods. Heliyon, 10, e40568. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2015). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium. (2019). National Agriculture Market (e-NAM): Annual Report 2018–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium. (2024). e-NAM Annual Progress Report 2023–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G. E., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1929–1958. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Taylor, J. W. (2003). Short-term electricity demand forecasting using double seasonal exponential smoothing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(8), 799–805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2018). Graph attention networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Varshini, B. S., Alam, M. W., Nayak, G. H., et al. (2025). CNN–Transformer hybrid deep learning model for agricultural commodity price forecasting. Discover Computing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Wang, L., et al. (2025). Time-series foundation models for agricultural forecasting. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Wu, Y., Li, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2025). Applications of machine learning and deep learning in agriculture: A comprehensive review. Green Technologies and Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Zelingher, R. (2024). Democratising agricultural commodity price forecasting: The AGRICAF approach. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Zhang, G. P. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Zhang, Y., Wu, X., Li, H., et al. (2025). A bibliometric review of deep learning in crop monitoring: Trends, challenges, and future perspectives. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Zhou, H., et al. (2024). Transformer architectures for multivariate time-series forecasting: Recent advances and applications. Expert Systems with Applications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Zhou, Z.-H. (2021). Machine Learning. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Zhu, Q., et al. (2024). Explainable AI techniques for agricultural decision-support systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Zou, J., Han, Y., & So, S.-S. (2008). Overview of artificial neural networks. Methods in Molecular Biology, 458, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices. (2023). Price Policy for Kharif Crops 2023–24. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Government of India. (2000). National Agriculture Policy 2000. Ministry of Agriculture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Government of India. (2007). National Policy for Farmers. Ministry of Agriculture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. 100. Government of India. (2023). Economic Survey 2022–23. Ministry of Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria