Practice Communication Aimi Homestead Family as Effort Embodiment Resilience Food Family

Authors

Nuryanti

Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)

Sri Pangestuti

Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)

S. Bekti Istiyanto

Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)

Tri Nugroho Adi

Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)

Agoeng Noegroho

Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)

Nana Sutikna

Communication Department, Faculty of Social Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000177

Subject Category: Communication

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2425-2430

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-23

Accepted: 2026-07-28

Published: 2026-08-05

Abstract

Resilience food family not only determined by availability food, but also by the communication process that forms knowledge, attitudes, and behavior member family in producing managing, and consuming food. Purpose study This is For analyze practice communication family in realize resilience food family at Aimi Homestead.

Keywords

communication family, resilience food family, literacy food, education family, communication development

Downloads

References

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth , C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. F.A.O. (2006). Food Security . Policy Brief, Issue 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. F.A.O. (2023). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20 (3), 275–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Galvin, K. M., Braithwaite, D. O., & Bylund , C. L. (2016). Family Communication: Cohesion and Change (9th ed.). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach. In DO Braithwaite & LA Baxter (Eds.), Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Melkote, S., & Steeves, H. (2015). Communication for Development . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Olson, D.H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22 (2), 144–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Servaes , J. (2008). Communication for development and social change. Communication Research Trends, 27 (4), 1–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Servaes , J. (2020). Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Truman, E., Lane, D., & Elliott, C. (2017). Defining food literacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Vidgen , H. A., & Gallegos, D. (2014). Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite, 76 , 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles