Translanguaging and Youth Identity: Banglish as a Medium of Expression and Belonging in Urban Bangladesh

In modern urban Bangladesh, young people increasingly communicate in a blend of Bangla and English, often referred to as Banglish. This linguistic hybridity is more than spontaneous mixing, it represents a form of translanguaging through which youth construct modern, inclusive identities and negotiate a sense of belonging in both local and global contexts. The study focuses on urban youth in Bangladesh and explores how they demonstrate creativity through the use of Banglish across different contexts, including social media, memes and discussions in university settings. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining semi-structured interviews with students and young professionals to uncover social meanings, online surveys to examine language preferences and usage patterns and meme and online conversation analysis to illustrate the role of translanguaging in digital humor and expression. In addition, ethnographic observations of campus conversations show how Banglish functions as a shared communicative code among youth. Situating these findings within existing studies on translanguaging in Bangladesh (e.g., Rafi 2022; Sajib 2019; Ahmed 2023), the research demonstrates how English is reimagined not as a foreign or elite language, but as an integral component of urban youth identity, creativity and community building in contemporary Bangladesh.

Banglish, translanguaging, digital humor, language.

1. Ahmed, S. (2023). Translanguaging practices among Bangladeshi youth in digital spaces. Journal of Multilingual Studies, 12(2), 145–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, S. (2024). Digital translanguaging and youth identity construction. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(1), 67–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Amin, M. (2025). Language ideology and classroom translanguaging in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Karim, M. (2025). Youth, social media, and translanguaging practices: A systematic review. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 29(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rafi, M. (2022). English, youth, and identity negotiation in urban Bangladesh. World Englishes, 41(3), 456–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sajib, S. (2019). Code-mixing and youth language practices in Bangladesh. South Asian Linguistics, 6(2), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2010). Youth, language, and identity. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 107–130). Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Understanding Kyrie Eleison: From Mass to Cultural Plea