Robustness of Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Traffic Forecasting Under Realistic Sensor Degradation

Short-term traffic forecasting plays an important role in intelligent transportation systems, as applications such as route guidance, adaptive traffic signal control, emergency response, congestion mitigation, and logistics planning depend on accurate estimates of future traffic states. Recent spatio-temporal graph neural network models, particularly Diffusion Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (DCRNN) and Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (STGCN), have improved traffic prediction by representing road sensors as graph nodes and jointly learning spatial and temporal relationships. However, strong performance on clean benchmark datasets does not always guarantee reliability in real-world conditions, where sensor reading may be missing, noisy, or unavailable due to hardware faults or communication issues. This paper provides a robust focused comparative evaluation of seven traffic forecasting approaches: Persistence, Historical Average, ARIMA, Random Forest, LSTM, STGCN, and DCRNN. Experiments are conducted on the METR-LA and PEMS-BAY speed datasets using 5-minute data intervals, a 12-step historical input sequence, and a 12-step forecasting horizon. Under clean-data conditions, DCRNN achieves the best overall MAE on both datasets, with 3.548 mph on METR-LA and 1.905 mph on PEMS-BAY. However, when 40% random missing input corruption is introduced, STGCN shows greater robustness than DCRNN; for METR-LA, STGCN’s MAE increases by 27.0%, while DCRNN’s MAE increases by 34.5%. Under complete sensor-failure conditions, the model ranking changes further, with the LSTM baseline showing greater stability than both graph-based models on METR-LA. Graph ablation analysis also indicates that temporal modeling accounts for most of the forecast improvement, while the evaluated graph topology provides only limited additional benefits. These findings suggest that traffic forecasting models should be assessed not only by clean-data accuracy but also by their robustness under degraded sensing conditions before deployment in real intelligent transportation systems.

Traffic forecasting, spatio-temporal graph neural networks, robustness, sensor failure

1. Y. Li, R. Yu, C. Shahabi, and Y. Liu, "Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. B. Yu, H. Yin, and Z. Zhu, "Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: A deep learning framework for traffic forecasting," in Proc. 27th Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), Stockholm, Sweden, 2018, pp. 3634–3640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. M. Defferrard, X. Bresson, and P. Vandergheynst, "Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering," in Proc. Advances Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 29, 2016, pp. 3844–3852. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Z. Wu, S. Pan, G. Long, J. Jiang, and C. Zhang, "Graph WaveNet for deep spatial-temporal graph modeling," in Proc. 28th Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), Macao, China, 2019, pp. 1907–1913. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. L. Bai, L. Yao, C. Li, X. Wang, and C. Wang, "Adaptive graph convolutional recurrent network for traffic forecasting," in Proc. Advances Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 33, 2020, pp. 17804–17815. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. S. Guo, Y. Lin, N. Feng, C. Song, and H. Wan, "Attention based spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for traffic flow forecasting," in Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 33, no. 1, 2019, pp. 922–929. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. W. Jiang and J. Luo, "Graph neural network for traffic forecasting: A survey," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 207, p. 117921, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, "Long short-term memory," Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Z. Cui, K. Henrickson, R. Ke, and Y. Wang, "Graph Markov network for traffic forecasting with missing data," Transp. Res. Part C, Emerg. Technol., vol. 117, p. 102671, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. J. Zuo, K. Zeitouni, Y. Taher, and S. Garcia-Rodriguez, "Graph convolutional networks for traffic forecasting with missing values," Data Mining Knowl. Discovery, vol. 37, pp. 913–947, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, "Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), Toulon, France, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. L. Breiman, "Random forests," Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins, G. C. Reinsel, and G. M. Ljung, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. K. Cho, B. van Merriënboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, and Y. Bengio, "Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation," in Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Lang. Process. (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, 2014, pp. 1724–1734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Y. N. Dauphin, A. Fan, M. Auli, and D. Grangier, "Language modeling with gated convolutional networks," in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), Sydney, Australia, 2017, pp. 933–941. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, "Adam: A method for stochastic optimization," in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. E. I. Vlahogianni, M. G. Karlaftis, and J. C. Golias, "Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we're going," Transp. Res. Part C, Emerg. Technol., vol. 43, pp. 3–19, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. C. Chen, K. Petty, A. Skabardonis, P. Varaiya, and Z. Jia, "Freeway performance measurement system: Mining loop detector data," Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 1748, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. B. M. Williams and L. A. Hoel, "Modeling and forecasting vehicular traffic flow as a seasonal ARIMA process: Theoretical basis and empirical results," J. Transp. Eng., vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 664–672, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. P. Veličković, G. Cucurull, A. Casanova, A. Romero, P. Liò, and Y. Bengio, "Graph attention networks," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. C. Zheng, X. Fan, C. Wang, and J. Qi, "GMAN: A graph multi-attention network for traffic prediction," in Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 34, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1234–1241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. D. Zügner, A. Akbarnejad, and S. Günnemann, "Adversarial attacks on neural networks for graph data," in Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, London, UK, 2018, pp. 2847–2856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. D. A. Tedjopurnomo, Z. Bao, B. Zheng, F. M. Choudhury, and A. K. Qin, "A survey on modern deep neural network for traffic prediction: Trends, methods and challenges," *IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.*, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1544–1561, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Y. Zhang, T. Cheng, and Y. Ren, "A graph deep learning method for short-term traffic forecasting on large road networks," Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 877–896, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Y. Li, R. Yu, C. Shahabi, and Y. Liu, “Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition