The But-Bot of Oras Eastern Samar: A Folklore Study of Subterranean Belief and Cultural Interpretation

Authors

Nick Algin M. Noromor

BS Entertainment and Multimedia Computing, Major in Digital Animation Eastern Samar State University, College of Computer Studies (Philippines)

Kyla Jane E. Ocenar

BS Entertainment and Multimedia Computing, Major in Digital Animation Eastern Samar State University, College of Computer Studies (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000051

Subject Category: Computer

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 596-607

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-30

Accepted: 2026-08-04

Published: 2026-08-31

Abstract

This study documented the folklore of the But-bot, a lesser-known subterranean creature believed to dwell in Oras, Eastern Samar. Using a qualitative design, the study gathered data through face-to-face, semi-structured, in-depth interviews with three key informants — a cultural elder, a traditional healer or tambalan, and a community member — who possessed inherited and experiential knowledge of the But-bot belief. The findings of this study were the basis for developing a multimedia material, following the modified ADDE framework (Analysis, Design, Development, and Evaluation).
Thematic analysis of the interviews identified the But-bot as a spirit-like creature that dwells underground, with only its head emerging to attack using its long tongue. The But-bot was described as malevolent, active during a specific period locally known as pangorason, or the full moon, when spirits are believed to roam freely. The creature is also believed to cause unexplainable illnesses that cannot be treated through ordinary medical means. In response, informants described protective practices, including reciting an orasyon performed by a tambalan, burning incense made from a dried carabao horn fragment, throwing salt, and placing a broom beside the door.

Keywords

socio-cultural sensitivity, development aspect, visuals, and prints

Downloads

References

1. Aktürk & Lerski (2021). Intangible cultural heritage: A benefit to climate-displaced and host communities. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Makgabo & Quintero (2024). Philippine and South African Experiences on Folk Literature Research: Relevance, Gains, and Challenges https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gungab (2023). Adarna: Remediating Philippine Source Texts Through Video Games https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/akda/vol3/iss2/6/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Geverola et.al (2025). Project CONAN: Enhancing Grade 8 Students’ Retention in Learning History using Contextualized Animation https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=33856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Nasir (2026). The Role of Technology in The Preservation and Dissemination of Folklore: A Systematic Literature Review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/407831698 The_Role of Technology_in_The_Preservation_and_Dissemination_of_Folklore_A_Systematic_Literature_Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Casibual (2022). Of Women and Monsters: A Case Study of Philippine Creature Urban Legends. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v27i2.143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Estil (2012). Philippine Folklore Forms: An Analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320553602_Philippine_Folklore_Forms_An_Analysis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Estil (2013). Filipino Folklore Revisited. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320553054_Filipino_Folklore_Revisited [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles