Board Characteristics, Intellectual Capital Efficiency and Financial Performance of Financial Service Firms in Nigeria.

The study investigated the influence of intellectual capital efficiency on the financial performance of listed financial service firms in Nigeria as well as the moderating role of board characteristics on this relationship. Ex-post facto research design was adopted and data extracted from the annual reports and accounts of 25 out of 42 financial institutions listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group. The data were analysed using panel data regression techniques including OLS, FE and RE while Hausman tests specified model selection across the models. Findings indicate varied association between the variables. HCE exerts significantly positive influence on the proxies of financial performance including RVG, ROA and ROE. In the same vein, BGE and BFE exhibit significantly positive influence on financial performance. Conversely, the interaction effects indicate negative moderation of BFE and BIN on the existing positive relationship. The study concludes that while making better use of intellectual capital can help improve financial results, how effective board characteristics are depends on the kind of governance practices that are in place. The study recommends that financial service companies set up governance systems that offer good oversight but also let them be flexible and adaptable in their strategies, so they can make the most of the value created by their intellectual capital.

Intellectual capital efficiency; Board characteristics; Revenue Growth; Return on Assets; Return on Equity; Board financial expertise; Board independence; Financial service firms; Nigeria

1. Ali, M., Hussain, N., & Ragab, A. A. (2022). Intellectual capital efficiency and firm financial performance: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5), 1052–1074. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2021). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Battisti, E., Nirino, N., Christofi, M., & Vrontis, D. (2022). Intellectual capital and dividend policy: The effect of CEO characteristics. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2020-0354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bala, A. J., Hassan, A., Dandago, K. I., Abubakar, A. B., & Maigoshi, Z. S. (2021). On the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm value: Evidence from the Nigerian oil and gas downstream sector. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 222–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bala, A. J., Hassan, A., Muhammad, M. L., Dandago, K. I., & Abubakar, A. B. (2024). Do board characteristics matter in the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm value? Evidence from the Nigerian oil and gas downstream sector. Future Business Journal, 10, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00351-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., Barone, E., & Hamdan, R. (2020). Increasing female participation on boards: Effects on sustainability reporting. International Journal of Finance and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., Reyad, S., Badawi, S., & Madbouly, A. (2021). The efficiency of intellectual capital and firm performance: Evidence from European firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Harper Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grant, R. M. (2022). Contemporary strategy analysis (11th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Habib, A. M., & Dalwai, T. (2023). Does the efficiency of a firm's intellectual capital and working capital management affect its performance? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(4), 3724–3760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01138-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kweh, Q. L., Lu, W. M., Ting, I. W. K., & Le, T. M. H. (2022). The cubic S-curve relationship between board independence and intellectual capital efficiency: Does firm size matter? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5), 1025–1051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Li, X., Nosheen, S., Haq, N. U., & Gao, X. (2021). Value creation during the fourth industrial revolution: Use of intellectual capital by the world's most innovative companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Measuring and reporting intellectual capital: Experience, issues and prospects. OECD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC™—An accounting tool for intellectual capital management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5–8), 702–714. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Doubleday. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2020). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: A modified and extended VAIC model. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 161–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Xu, J., & Wang, B. (2018). Intellectual capital, financial performance and firms' sustainable growth: Evidence from the Korean manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 10(12), 4651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Xu, J., & Wang, B. (2021). Intellectual capital efficiency and firm performance: Evidence from European listed firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yao, H., Haris, M., & Tariq, G. (2019). Intellectual capital, profitability, and productivity: Evidence from Pakistani financial institutions. Sustainability, 11(14), 3842. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study on Customer Awareness on Green Banking Intiatives
• International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Management: A Global Research Landscape Analysis
• Analysis of Financial Performance and Operational Efficiency of State Bank of India Using the CAMEL Framework
• Roles and Performance of India Post Payment Bank (IPPB) With Special References to Shivamogga District
• Enhancing Transactional Security in U.S. Banking Systems by Implementing OTP-Based Two-Factor Authentication to Mitigate Debit and Credit Card Fraud