Teaching Four Skills Together to the Second Language Learners Through CLT and New Modified Method: Challenges and Benefits Found from Classroom Practices and Students’ Perspectives
Authors
Assistant Professor, Department of English, Gopalganj Science and Technology University (Bangladesh)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000193
Subject Category: Language
Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3244-3258
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-06
Accepted: 2026-09-11
Published: 2026-09-15
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether all four skills can be incorporated together in a single classroom by Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and a modified method (e.g. eclectic method). The study also tries to find out some challenges and benefits from students’ perspectives of classroom practices. 86 students and 13 teachers from different private universities were given online questionnaire through Google form. 5 teachers were interviewed as follow-up session. All the data were analyzed using mixed method of statistical quantitative and descriptive qualitative methods. My study objective is to talk about how successful a teacher can be to initiate a new modified method in a language learning classroom and how can students get benefited from the innovative practices. In earlier time, even in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Listening and Speaking were ignored by language practitioners. But English Language Teachers are being concerned about introducing both receptive and productive skills in their classrooms. The study employs a new technique following a new method which can be regarded as eclectic method, a mixed combination method rather than previous dogmatic ideology. In post-methodological era, language learners should be introduced with a new method. Along with demonstrating the benefits from application of new methods and techniques, the general purpose of the study is to investigate students’ perspectives after taking some language classes. To do this, close and open- ended questions are set to collect data and a mixed method statistical and descriptive method were followed to critically analyze data. The practical decision making of teachers and students feedback and evaluation will be also judged at the end of the paper.
Keywords
“Four Skills”, "CLT”, “Modified Eclectic Method”, “Students-Teachers’ Perspective”, “Benefits and challenges”
Downloads
References
1. Alam, S. (2020). Application and justification of Eclectic Approach (an innovative teaching style) for ELT practitioners in both Private and Public Universities in Bangladesh. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Seven Sense Research Group Journal, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V7I6P106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baker, W. (2012). Understanding English as a lingua franca – By B. Seidlhofer [Review of the book Understanding English as a lingua franca, by B. Seidlhofer]. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00305.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Begum, G., & Podder, R. (2025). English language teacher education in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Teacher Education Journal (BTEJ), 5, 28–40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399442816_English_language_teacher_education_in_Banglades [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89–112. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Medgyes, P. (1986). Queries from a communicative teacher. ELT Journal, 40(2), 107–112. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Morley, J. (2001). Listening Comprehension Instructional Models: Matching Theory and Practice. How, 9(1), 5–8. https://www.howjournalcolombia.org/index.php/how/article/view/197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Norton, B. (2011). The practice of theory in the language classroom. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 171–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The Importance of Four Skills Reading, Speaking, Writing, Listening in a Lesson Hour. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1, 29-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v1i1.p29-31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Reconceptualising "English." In Understanding English as a lingua franca (pp. 56–84). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second language classroom research. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Wallace, C. (1992b). Reading. Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wallace, M. (1980). Study Skills in English. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Yin, J. (2019). Connecting theory and practice in teacher education: English-as-a-foreign-language pre-service teachers’ perceptions of practicum experience. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0003-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
- Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
- Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
- Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
- Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests