Ethnomedicinal Plant Diversity, Harvesting Patterns and Traditional Healthcare Practices in Jaipur District, Rajasthan, India
Authors
Department of Botany, Jaipur College of Education and Science (India)
Department of Basic Life and Applied Sciences, APEX University (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000216
Subject Category: Ethnography
Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3530-3540
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-31
Accepted: 2026-09-05
Published: 2026-09-16
Abstract
Traditional plant knowledge remains important to primary healthcare and biocultural continuity in rural and tribal communities of Rajasthan. This study re-analysed the ethnomedicinal component of an 18-month floristic and ethnobotanical investigation conducted in Jaipur district during 2020–2022. The original work used repeated seasonal collection tours, purposive and accessibility-based engagement with locally knowledgeable participants, individual and group discussions, participant observation, guided plant walks, botanical collection and herbarium preparation. The dataset comprises 121 medicinal taxa (117 angiosperms and four pteridophytes). Leaves were reported for 63 taxa (52.06%), followed by roots for 36 (29.75%), seeds for 28 (23.14%), whole plants for 27 (22.31%) and fruits for 25 (20.66%). Herbs (45 taxa; 37.19%) and trees (41; 33.88%) dominated the growth-habit spectrum; phanerophytes (51; 42.14%) and therophytes (43; 35.54%) dominated the life-form spectrum. Fresh non-exclusive coding of the archived remedy descriptions identified gastrointestinal uses for 66 taxa, dermatological/oral/wound uses for 64, metabolic/systemic uses for 57 and musculoskeletal/inflammatory uses for 53. Of 225 plant-part use occurrences, 65 (28.9%) involved roots, rhizomes or whole plants and were classified as potentially destructive. These counts describe the breadth of recorded knowledge, not treatment efficacy or informant consensus. Because the archive lacks a complete participant-level matrix and a voucher catalogue with accession numbers, use value, fidelity level and informant consensus factor were not reconstructed, and taxonomic names remain subject to voucher-based revalidation. The study supplies a transparent regional baseline for conservation prioritisation, renewed consent-based fieldwork and pharmacological screening.
Keywords
ethnobotany; ethnomedicine; Jaipur district
Downloads
References
1. Albuquerque, U.P., Ramos, M.A., Ferreira Junior, W.S. and de Medeiros, P.M. (2017). History and concepts. In: Ethnobotany for Beginners. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Benz, B.F., Cevallos, J., Santana, F., Rosales, J. and Graf, S. (2000). Losing knowledge about plant use in the Sierra de Manantlán Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany, 54(2), 183–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cotton, C.M. (1996). Ethnobotany: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fabricant, D.S. and Farnsworth, N.R. (2001). The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl. 1), 69–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Graziose, R., Lila, M.A. and Raskin, I. (2010). Merging traditional Chinese medicine with modern drug discovery technologies to find novel drugs and functional foods. Current Drug Discovery Technologies, 7(1), 2–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Harshberger, J.W. (1896). The purposes of ethnobotany. Botanical Gazette, 21, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Heinrich, M., Kufer, J., Leonti, M. and Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2006). Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology—interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 107, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Heinrich, M. (2014). Ethnopharmacology: quo vadis? Challenges for the future. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 24(2), 99–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. International Society of Ethnobiology (2006). International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). https://www.ethnobiology.net/what-we-do/core-programs/ise-ethics-program/code-of-ethics/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Jishtu, V., Moran, A., Ibrahim, M. and Ahmad, Z. (2025). Quantitative study of the Indian ethnobotanical medicinal plant resources in the remote Zanskar Valley of Ladakh. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 31, 1–28. https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/6943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Leonti, M. (2011). The future is written: impact of scripts on the cognition, selection, knowledge and transmission of medicinal plant use and its implications for ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 134(3), 542–555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Leonti, M. and Casu, L. (2013). Traditional medicines and globalization: current and future perspectives in ethnopharmacology. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 4, 92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Leung, A.Y. (2006). Traditional toxicity documentation of Chinese Materia Medica—an overview. Toxicologic Pathology, 34(4), 319–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Martin, G.J. (2004). Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Earthscan, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Muthukrishnan, S. and Ramachandran, A. (2025). Ethnobotanical study of the medicinal plants used by rural communities in the foothill villages of the Alagar Hills region, Eastern Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 30, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/6242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Patwardhan, B. and Mashelkar, R.A. (2009). Traditional medicine-inspired approaches to drug discovery: can Ayurveda show the way forward? Drug Discovery Today, 14(15–16), 804–811. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Rajasekaran, B. and Warren, D.M. (1994). Indigenous knowledge for socio-economic development and biodiversity conservation: the Kolli Hills. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 2, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ralte, L. and Singh, Y.T. (2024). Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the indigenous community of Mizoram, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00642-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (2026). Plants of the World Online. https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed 3 September 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Schippmann, U., Cunningham, A.B. and Leaman, D.J. (2002). Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues. FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Siddamurthy, R.R. and Araveeti, M.R. (2026). Medicinal plants used in the treatment of neurological disorders by traditional practitioners of YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 33, 1–19. https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/7576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Srithi, K., Balslev, H., Wangpakapattanawong, P., Srisanga, P. and Trisonthi, C. (2009). Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the Mien (Yao) in northern Thailand. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 123(2), 335–342. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Subba Limboo, A.R., Gurung, S., Subba, A., Banu, T., Rai, S.K. and Tamang, A.M. (2026). Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 34, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Upadhya, V., Hegde, H.V., Bhat, S. and Kholkute, S.D. (2014). Non-codified traditional medicine practices from Belgaum region in Southern India: present scenario. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Vandebroek, I. and Balick, M.J. (2012). Globalization and loss of plant knowledge: challenging the paradigm. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Ved, D.K. and Goraya, G.S. (2007). Demand and Supply of Medicinal Plants in India. National Medicinal Plants Board and FRLHT, Bangalore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. World Health Organization (2003). WHO Guidelines on Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP) for Medicinal Plants. World Health Organization, Geneva. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]