Developing an Interactive Three Dimensional (3D) Digital Soil Map for Some Part of Ondo State, Tropical Soil, Nigeria

Authors

Oni, Adedolapo Dorcas

Federal University of Technology, Akure (Nigeria)

Tomori, Wasiu Bolaji

Federal University of Technology, Akure (Nigeria)

Oyerinde, Waliyat Adejoke

Federal University of Technology, Akure (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000232

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3719-3755

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-29

Accepted: 2026-09-03

Published: 2026-09-17

Abstract

Reliable soil information is fundamental to sustainable land management, agricultural productivity, and environmental planning. Digital Soil Map (DSM) enable better understanding of soil variability especially in tropical regions where soil properties vary considerably across space and depth. This study aimed to develop an interactive three-dimensional (3D) DSM for Ondo North tropical soil, Southwestern Nigeria using soil pedological/morphological characteristics, physico-chemical properties, macro- and micro-nutrients properties of the study area. Soil pedon (profile pit; 1.0×1.5×2.0m) were dug, and 0-5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-60, 60-100, and 100-200 cm depthwise samples were taken. Field observations were collected by inspection for color, texture, structure, drainage slope, land use/crops, mottle, consistence, inclusion using field data form. Physico-chemical properties, macro- and micro-nutrients contents of soil samples were obtained using standard procedure. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and organic matter (SOM) were typically found highest in surface layers (0-5 cm) and ranged respectively from 0.03 to 4.28 % and 0.10 to 5.98 % across the study sites. Soil pH values were slightly acidic to neutral conditions, ranging from 5.01 to 6.97 with sub soil more acidic than the surface soil layers. Electrical conductivity (EC) values varied significantly from 3.00 to 657.00 μS/cm, with peak values mostly in surface layers (103 to 657.00 μS/cm). The redox potential (mV) ranged from 21.00 mV (more reduced conditions) to 186.00 mV (more oxidized conditions) for surface soil and 36.00 to 186.00 mV for subsoil layer. Organic nitrogen (ON) values vary from 0.01 to 3.74%, highest in surface layers (0.04 to 3.74%) and lower in the subsoil (0.01 to 0.89%). Phosphorus (P) content varied widely, from 0.01 to 0.59 mg/kg, with the highest concentrations in surface layers (0.01 to 0.45 mg/kg) and lowest concentrations in subsoil (0.03 to 0.59mg/kg). Most sites exhibited decreasing organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus with depth, exchangeable bases were dominated by calcium followed by magnesium, potassium and sodium which is low indicating the absence of sodicity risk. Moderate Iron and Manganese concentration respectively indicate advanced tropical weathering, Copper and Zinc exhibited surface enrichment linked to surface enrichment linked to organic matter while Chromium were generally low reflecting lithogenic origin and minimal contamination. The morphological analysis indicated that the Akoko South East and some part in Akoko North West of the study area consists of well-drained soils with textures ranging from loamy sand to clay and moderate prismatic structures. In contrast, other areas feature moderately drained soils with textures varying from loamy to clay, this brings a better view without pervasiveness for sustainable agricultural productivity in the study area.

Keywords

pedological/morphological characteristics, physicochemical properties, macro and micro nutrients, DSM, SOC

Downloads

References

1. Adewara, O. A., Adebayo-Olajide, T. C., Ayedun, J. S., Kotun, B. C., Adeleke, A. J., Brown, A. D., & Ogunbanwo, S. T. (2024). Soil formation, soil health, and soil biodiversity. In S. A. Aransiola, B. R. Babaniyi, A. B. Aransiola, & N. R. Maddela (Eds.), Prospects for soil regeneration and its impact on environmental protection. Springer Cham. 95–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdulmanov, R., Miftakhov, I., Ishbulatov, M., Galeev, E., & Shafeeva, E. (2021). Comparison of the effectiveness of GIS-based interpolation methods for estimating the spatial distribution of agrochemical soil properties. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 24, 101970. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boie, F., Ducey, T. F., Xing, Y., Wang, J., & Rinklebe, J. (2024). Field-aged rice hull biochar stimulated the methylation of mercury and altered the microbial community in a paddy soil under controlled redox condition changes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 472, 134446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barma, S. (2024). Effect of nano urea and seaweed extract in combination with conventional nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of kharif maize (Doctoral dissertation, Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia–741252). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bouma, J., Bonfante, A., Basile, A., van Tol, J., Hack-ten Broeke, M. J. D., Mulder, M., ... & Hirmas, D. R. (2022). How can pedology and soil classification contribute towards sustainable development as a data source and information carrier? Geoderma, 424, 115988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cardone, L., Castronuovo, D., Perniola, M., Scrano, L., Cicco, N., & Candido, V. (2020). The influence of soil physical and chemical properties on saffron (Crocus sativus L.) growth, yield, and quality. Agronomy, 10(8), 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, Q., Song, Y., An, Y., Lu, Y., & Zhong, G. (2024). Soil microorganisms: Their role in enhancing crop nutrition and health. Diversity, 16(12), 734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Choudhary, M., Chandra, P., Dixit, B., Nehra, V., Choudhary, U., & Choudhary, S. (2022). Plant growth-promoting microbes: Role and prospective in amelioration of salt stress. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(13), 1692-1711. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Corti, G., Cocco, S., Colombo, C., Comolli, R., Dazzi, C., Freppaz, M., & Vittori Antisari, L. (2024). Soil science in Italy from 2000 to 2024. In Dazzi, C., Benedetti, A., Corti, G., Costantini, E.A.C. (eds) Soil Science in Italy. Springer, Cham. 97-133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dada, B. F., Ewulo, B. S., Awodun, M. A., Adebisi, T. D., & Ajayi, S. O. (2020). Physio-morphological characteristics of soil of Akure, Ondo State SW, Nigeria. IJPSS, 32, 82-97. DOI: 10.9734/IJPSS/2020/v32i1130346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dutta, A., Maity, A., & Bhattacharya, P. (2024). Understanding Soil Formation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Concepts, Pedogenic Processes, and Factors. Agriculture Re-imagined: Innovations and Strategies for Sustainable Growth, 111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2006).Guidelines for soil description(4th ed.). FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a0541e/a0541e.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gavlak,R., Horneck,D., and Miller,R.O.(2005).Soil,plant and water reference methods for the western region(3rd ed.). Western Rural Development Center. http:// www.soils.org/files napt/western-states-method-manual-2005.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gondal, A. H., Hussain, I., Ijaz, A. B., Zafar, A., Ch, B. I., Zafar, H., & Usama, M. (2021). Influence of soil pH and microbes on mineral solubility and plant nutrition: A review. International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5(1), 71-81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hicks-Pries, C. E., Ryals, R., Zhu, B., Min, K., Cooper, A., Goldsmith, S., & Berhe, A. A. (2023). The deep soil organic carbon response to global change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 54(1), 375-401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, M., Khan, S., & Zwiazek, J. J. (2024). Overexpression of Nicotiana tabacum PIP1; 3 enhances root aeration and oxygen metabolism in canola (Brassica napus) plants exposed to root hypoxia. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 216, 109122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lu, J. L., Jia, P., Feng, S. W., Wang, Y. T., Zheng, J., Ou, S. N., & Li, J. T. (2022). Remarkable effects of microbial factors on soil phosphorus bioavailability: A country‐scale study. Global Change Biology, 28(14), 4459-4471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mesele, S. A., Soremi, P. A., Ayamba, B. E., Aderolu, J., & Olayiwola, V. A. (2024). Organic carbon and nutrient enrichment in clay-rich calcareous soils in self-regenerating fallows in humid tropical agroecology. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 17(12), 313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mustapha, A. A., Abdulrahman, B. L., Dawaki, M. U., & Usman, A. (2022). Comparative determination of available phosphorus at different pH levels in Nigerian Savannah soils using Mehlich, Olsen, and Bray methods. Nigerian Journal of Soil Environmental Research, 21, 69-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pondthai, P., Wongadsapaiboon, T., Boonsri, I., & Everett, M. E. (2025). Identification of Burials via GPR Signal Classification and Spatial Cluster Analysis at a Prehistoric Thai Site. Archaeological Prospection.http://doi.org/10.1002/arp.70029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Saha, S., & Pal, S. K. (2024). Degree of phosphorus saturation as environmental threshold for acidic soils of Eastern India. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 235(10), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Saleem, A., Zulfiqar, A., Saleem, M. Z., Ali, B., Saleem, M. H., Ali, S., & Mostafa, R. M. (2023). Alkaline and acidic soil constraints on iron accumulation by rice cultivars in relation to several physio-biochemical parameters. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1), 397. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04400-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saleem, S., Mushtaq, N. U., Rasool, A., Shah, W. H., Tahir, I., & Rehman, R. U. (2023). Plant nutrition and soil fertility: Physiological and molecular avenues for crop improvement. In Tariq Aftab, Khalid Rehman Hakeem (Eds) Sustainable plant nutrition, Academic Press, 23–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., & Loeppert, R. H. (Eds.). (2020). Methods of soil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods. John Wiley & Sons. 1309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Srivastava, P. C., Joshi, D., Pachauri, S. P., Mehetre, S. T., & Shrivastava, M. (2024). Assessing micronutrients in soil with a new chemical extractant using isotopic dilution techniques: Linkages to labile fractions in soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 55(18), 2736–2754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vakeri, S. M., Sinha, A., Greca, L. G., Salim, M. H., Mabrook, G., Ziyan, Z., ... & Tardy, B. L. (2025). Living sand: Microbial nanocellulose and chitin-rich mycelia enhance granular material properti [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wan, Y., Chen, P., Qiu, Y., Zheng, K., & Yuan, M. (2025). Utilizing Indigenous Microorganisms to Stabilize Humus Soil from a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill with Optimized Microbial Strain Selection. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 236(2), 143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. White, T., & Provenzale, A. (2024). Bedrock, Regolith, and Soil Continuum: Pedogenic Perspectives and Factors Controlling Spatial Distribution of Soils. Critical Zone and Ecosystem Dynamics, 149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yadav, D. S., Jaiswal, B., Gautam, M., & Agrawal, M. (2020). Soil acidification and its impact on plants. In Singh, P., Singh, S.K., Prasad, S.M. (Eds) Plant Responses to Soil Pollution. Springer, Singapore. 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yousuf, M., Tian, Z. Y., Mansy, A. E., & Naseer, M. U. H. (2025). Soil Chemistry. In Environmental Chemistry: Advanced Concepts and Applications (pp. 217-261). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yusuf, Y. M., Madukwe, D. K., & Kebede, F. (2023). Establishing phosphorus critical values for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fertilization with phosphate fertilizers on the Sudan savanna soils using three soil phosphorus extraction methods and field experimentation in Kano State, Nigeria. Frontiers in Agronomy, 5, 1181045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1181045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles