Food, Gender and Common Property Resources: An Understanding of Rural and Tribal Economy

Authors

Dr. Maneesha Pandey

Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, Hindu College, University of Delhi. (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000257

Subject Category: Political Science

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 4063-4077

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-06

Accepted: 2026-09-11

Published: 2026-09-19

Abstract

Natural resources play a significant role in the life of rural Indians. Even in the tribal communities these resources are an essential need. All the natural resources, such as forests, rivers and ponds not only shape the cultural life of the rural and tribal people, but they are also important for their survival. Researchers have shown that in the coastal area the entire income of the fishermen community is based on rivers. There is a high demand for fish in the local, national, and international markets. Similarly, forest-based communities depend upon a range of minor forest products that include gum, herbs, nuts, and other items for subsistence as well as cultural needs. Not only men but also women of the local communities collect these products for domestic consumption as well as sell them in the local markets for income generation.
In this paper I analyse the relationship between natural resources and rural and tribal communities examined from a gendered lens. Further, this work brings into perspective the effects of involuntary displacement on the lives and natural resources of local communities impacted by mega development projects.

Keywords

Common property resources, gender, decision-making, food, NTFP

Downloads

References

1. Shiva, V. (2019). Earth Democracy: Sustainability, Justice and Peace. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal. Vol 26. No. 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/belj/vol26/iss1/1 accessed on 24.03.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Government of India. National Sample Survey Organisation. (1999). Common Property Resources in India. NSS 54th Round. Report No. 452. January - June 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. In Agarwal, Bina. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia (Chapter 2: Land Rights and Women’s Autonomy). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gaur, M. K., Goyal, R. K., Kalappurakkal, S., & Pandey, C. B. (2018). Common Property Resources in Dryland of India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. Vol. 25. Issue 6. Pages 491-499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jodha, N.S. (1994). Common Property Resources and Dynamics of Rural Poverty (Field Evidence from Dry Regions of India). Available at: https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlcrest/api/core/bitstreams/8db6f872-f7f9-4ea3-a73d-eab1582fedf5/content accessed on 28.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://www.worldbank.org/en/brief/2023/06/11/what-is-food-security accessed on 24.03.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights accessed on 24.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eide, A. (1998). The Human Right to Adequate Food and Freedom from Hunger. In ‘The Right to Food in Theory and Practice.’ Available at: https://www.fao.org/4/w9990e/w9990e03.htm accessed on 29.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. United Nations Human Rights. (2010). The Right to Adequate Food. Fact Sheet No. 34. Pages 4-5. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/FactSheet34en.pdf accessed on 25.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. UNDP. (2014). Human Development Report- Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/human-development-report-2014.human-development-report-2014 accessed on 27.03.2025. Page 49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Barrett, C.B. (2010). Measuring Food Insecurity. Science. Vol. 327. No. 5967. Pages 825–828. And Webb, P., Coates, J., Frongillo, E.A., Rogers, B.L., Swindale, A., and Bilinsky P. (2006). P. Measuring household food insecurity: Why it’s so important and yet so difficult to do. The Journal of Nutrition. Vol. 136. Issue 5. Pages 1404S–1408S. (cited in McKay FH et. al. 2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McKay FH, John P, Sims A, Kaur G, Kaushal J. (2020). Documenting the Food Insecurity Experiences and Nutritional Status of Women in India: Study Protocol. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. May 26;17(11):3769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113769. PMID: 32466486; PMCID: PMC7312776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=151969&ModuleId=3&reg=3&lang=1 accessed on 29.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jodha, N.S. (1992). Rural Common Property Resources: the missing dimension of development strategies. Washington D.C., World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jodha, N.S. (1986). Common Property Resources and Rural Poor in Dry Regions Of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(27). pp 1169-1181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jodha, N.S. (1994). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gupta, A.K. (1987). Why Poor People do not Cooperate. A Study of Traditional Forms of Cooperation with Implications for Modern Organization. In G.C. Wanger, (ed.) Politics and practices of social research. London, Allen and Unwin. And Shankarnaryan, K.A. & Kalla, J.C. (1985). Management systems for natural vegetation. Jodhpur, Rajasthan, Central Arid Zone Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Aron, D.V. et. al. (2023). Global Poverty Monitoring Technical Note: September 2023 Update to the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP) What’s New. The World Bank. Page 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/gender-discrimination-in-social-norms.html accessed on 30.03.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mehta, A. K and Pratap, S. (2017). Exploring the Possibility of Estimating the Monetary Value of Women’s Contribution to GDP. National Commission for Women (NCW). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Harper, Sarah. et. al. (2013). Women and Fisheries: Contribution to Food Security and Local Economies. Marine Policy, Elsevier. . Vol. 39 (C). Pages 56-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. OECD. (2023). SIGI 2023 Global Report: Gender Equality in Times of Crisis, Social Institutions and Gender Index, OECD Publishing. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/4607b7c7-en. Pages133 and 148. Accessed on 30.03.2025; (2) Huyer, S. (2021). Building Farmers’ Resilience to Climate Change Means Addressing Gender Inequalities. Available at: https://gender.cgiar.org/news/building-farmers-resilience-climate-change-meansaddressing-gender-inequalities accessed on 30.03.2025; and (3) CARE International. (2022). “Men and women are two hands”: CARE’s experience of engaging men and boys in programming for climate justice, CARE Climate Change and Resilience Platform (CCRP), The Hague, https://reliefweb.int/report/world/cares-experience-engagingmen-and-boys-programming-climate-justice-learning-review. Accessed on 30.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Parihar, T. and Chowdhury, D. (2023). Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs) in India for Energy and Infrastructure Projects. The Indian Journal of Projects, Infrastructure and Energy Laws (IJPIEL). December. Available at: https://ijpiel.com/index.php/2023/12/22/environmental-and-social-impact-assessments-esias-in-india-for-energy-and-infrastructure-projects/ accessed on 31.03.2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mehta, A. K. and Pratap, S. (2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Arnold, J.E.M. (1990). Common Property Management and Sustainable Development in India. Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ea838914-d12d-46a2-b14b-ad34de298784/content access on 29.03.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jodha, N.S. (1986). Page 1177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. SIGI 2023 Global Report. Page 131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. . Shahbaz, P., Ul Haq, S., Abbas, A., Batool, Z., Alotaibi, B. A., & Nayak, R. K. (2022). Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices through Women Involvement in Decision Making Process: Exploring the Role of Empowerment and Innovativeness. Agriculture, 12(8), 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles