Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Migration, Livelihood, and Psychosocial Wellbeing of Migrant Construction Workers in Noida and Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh: A Quantitative Study

Authors

Vishvajeet Dutta

Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia University (India)

Ashvini Kumar Singh

Professor, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia University (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000061

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 808-825

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-17

Accepted: 2026-09-22

Published: 2026-10-05

Abstract

Background: Migrant construction workers form a large but weakly protected segment of India's informal urban workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing nationwide lockdown disrupted their employment, mobility, housing, and psychosocial wellbeing on an unprecedented scale, yet construction-specific evidence from the National Capital Region remains limited.
Methodology: An exploratory, cross-sectional quantitative design was used. A structured interview schedule was administered to 200 purposively sampled migrant construction workers (100 each from NOIDA and Ghaziabad). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's rank correlation, and exploratory univariate intercept tests. Fisher’s exact tests were used for sparse suicidal-ideation contingency tables. Here, “impact” denotes workers’ self-reported pandemic-related experiences and perceived effects, not an estimate of causal effects.
Results: Respondents were predominantly male (77%), married (77%), and educationally disadvantaged (79.5% with no more than primary schooling). Employment disruption was reported by 91.5% of respondents, and 69.5% reported job loss. Psychological distress was widespread (90.5% reported at least one symptom), and 87.0% reported substance use during the pandemic. Welfare-scheme awareness was negligible (11.6% among respondents), and contractors, not government agencies, were the principal source of support (31.5% vs. 0.5%).
Conclusion: Migrant construction workers reported employment, welfare, and psychosocial vulnerabilities during the pandemic, with support received mainly through informal, contractor-mediated channels rather than formal state mechanisms. Portable welfare entitlements, on-site healthcare, and psychosocial support integrated into labour-welfare schemes are recommended.

Keywords

migrant construction workers; COVID-19; reverse migration; psychosocial distress; informal labour; quantitative study

Downloads

References

1. Ahmed, D., Benavente, P., & Diaz, E. (2023). Food insecurity among international migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azeez, A. E. P., Negi, D. P., Rani, A., & Kumar, S. A. P. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on migrant women workers in India. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 62(1), 93–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bhagat, R. B. (2014). Urban migration trends, challenges and opportunities in India [Background paper]. International Organization for Migration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Breman, J. (1996). Footloose labour: Working in India's informal economy. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Breman, J. (2013). At work in the informal economy of India: A perspective from the bottom up. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Breman, J. (2016). On pauperism in present and past. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, No. 27 of 1996, India Code (1996). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, M. A. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies (WIEGO Working Paper No. 1). Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deshingkar, P., & Akter, S. (2009). Migration and human development in India (Human Development Research Paper 2009/13). United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Labour Organization. (2018). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture (3rd ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ishikawa, K. (1990). Introduction to quality control (J. H. Loftus, Trans.). 3A Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Istiko, S. N., Durham, J., & Elliott, L. (2022). (Not that) essential: A scoping review of migrant workers' access to health services and social protection during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jha, A. (2021). Vulnerability of construction workers during COVID-19: Tracking welfare responses and challenges. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 64(4), 1043–1067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kumar, K., Mehra, A., Sahoo, S., Nehra, R., & Grover, S. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on the migrant workers: A cross-sectional survey. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 102252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Moura, H. S. D., Berra, T. Z., Rosa, R. J., Silva, R. V. D. S., Soares, D. de A., de Araujo, J. S. T., Costa, F. B. P., de Souza, R. M. P., do Nascimento, M. C., Teibo, T. K. A., Serrano-Gallardo, M. D. P., & Arcencio, R. A. (2023). Health condition, income loss, food insecurity and other social inequities among migrants and refugees during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1728. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mukherjee, S. (2020). Disparities, desperation, and divisiveness: Coping with COVID-19 in India. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 12(6), 582–584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pattenden, J. (2016). Labour, state and society in rural India: A class-relational approach. Manchester University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Raj, D., Swain, P. K., Behera, B., & Singh, B. P. (2021). Quantile regression approach for quality of life of construction labourers in Varanasi City, India. Thailand Statistician, 19(1), 58–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rajan, S. I., Sivakumar, P., & Srinivasan, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and internal labour migration in India: A "crisis of mobility." The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 1021–1039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5–6), 531–578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Srivastava, R., & Sutradhar, R. (2016). Labour migration to the construction sector in India and its impact on rural poverty. Indian Journal of Human Development, 10(1), 27–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tanwar, S., Sahu, K. K., Sahu, S., & Singhal, A. K. (2021). Pandemic stress and well-being of migrants. Indian Journal of Psychiatric Social Work, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles