Economic Barriers to Church Growth in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania: Evidence from Morogoro Diocese

Authors

Raymond Dunia

Department of Theology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Teofilo Kisanji University, Mbeya (Tanzania)

Rev. Dr. Mwenisongole, T.A

Teofilo Kisanji University, Master of Theology (Tanzania)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000062

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 826-836

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-09

Accepted: 2026-09-14

Published: 2026-10-05

Abstract

This article examined economic barriers reported to constrain church growth in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania, with specific focus on Morogoro Diocese. The study used a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation cross-sectional design and involved 121 participants, comprising 110 church members and 11 key informants from Maseyu and Gezaulole congregations and their affiliated outstations. Questionnaire data were analysed in SPSS version 25 using frequencies and percentages, while interview data were transcribed and organised thematically according to the study objective. Low income from donations and tithes was reported by 42 respondents (34.7%), limited market access for agricultural products by 31 (25.6%), and poor infrastructure by 24 (19.8%). In addition, 68 respondents (56.2%) perceived the barriers as strongly weakening financial stability, while 66 respondents (54.5%) identified agriculture as the economic activity most affected. Community service programmes were the service area most frequently reported as constrained, at 47.1%. Interview accounts linked these patterns with unstable income, limited capital, weak market access, inadequate planning and limited management skills. The findings represent respondent perceptions within two congregational settings and do not establish causal effects or the monetary size of losses because audited financial, agricultural revenue and service expenditure records were not analysed. The article recommends measurable income diversification, agricultural record keeping, stronger financial reporting, targeted management training and structured partnerships.

Keywords

economic barriers, church economic growth, financial sustainability, resource mobilisation, ELCT, Morogoro Diocese

Downloads

References

1. Agyei-Mensah, B. K. (2016). Accountability and internal control in religious organisations: A study of Methodist Church Ghana. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1504/AJAAF.2016.078302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, 26(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bayno, P. M., Haule, H. T., & Temu, S. S. (2025). Budgeting and financial accountability in religious organisations: Evidence from Catholic and Lutheran churches in Tanzania. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 8(3), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajbe.8.3.3960 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Getui, N., Ichuloi, A., & Kandagor, D. (2023a). Assessment of financial management systems for sustainability of the SDA Church in South-East Kenya Field, Kenya. Journal of Pastoral and Practical Theology, 2(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.51317/jppt.v2i1.378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Getui, N., Ichuloi, A., & Kandagor, D. (2023b). Diversification of financial sources for sustainability of the Seventh Day Adventist Church in South East Kenya Field. Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 2(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.51317/jpr.v2i1.377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles