Digital Petroleum and Economic Evaluation under Nigeria’s Petroleum Industry Act: Development and Validation of an Integrated Economic Evaluation and Investment Support Tool
Authors
New Brunswick Power Corporation (Canada)
Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port Harcourt (Canada)
Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port Harcourt (Canada)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000076
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 1105-1120
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-07
Accepted: 2026-09-12
Published: 2026-10-04
Abstract
The Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021 introduced a new fiscal framework for Nigeria's upstream petroleum sector, creating a need for reliable and efficient tools capable of evaluating petroleum investment opportunities under the evolving fiscal regime. However, conventional spreadsheet-based economic evaluation methods are often characterized by extensive manual computations, limited automation, and inadequate integration of risk and uncertainty analysis. This study developed and validated a Python-based Economic Evaluation and Investment Decision Support Tool (EEIDST) to provide an integrated digital framework for petroleum fiscal and economic evaluation under the PIA 2021. The study adopted a design, development, and validation methodology. The EEIDST integrates petroleum fiscal modelling, discounted cash flow analysis, economic evaluation, and sensitivity analysis within a unified analytical environment. The tool was designed to evaluate key economic indicators, including Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Profitability Index (PI), Payback Period, Unit Capital Cost, Unit Operating Cost, Unit Technical Cost, and Government Take. Verification of the computational accuracy of the EEIDST framework was done using representative onshore petroleum project data with an independently developed Excel-based discounted cash flow model. Results showed a high level of agreement between the two model, with percentage errors for key economic indicators ranging from 0.01% to 3.73%, confirming the computational accuracy of the EEIDST model. Then validation of the reliability of the model was done through oil price and CAPEX sensitivity analysis and scenario-based analysis to determine if results from the model are logical and consistent with petroleum economic principles. The response of the EEIDST solution was consistent with established petroleum economic principles, where higher oil prices improved project profitability, higher capital costs reduced investment performance. The study concludes that the EEIDST provides a reliable, transparent, and automated platform for petroleum economic evaluation and investment decision support under Nigeria's PIA fiscal regime. The tool offers practical value to investors, petroleum operators, regulators, financial institutions, and policymakers.
Keywords
Petroleum Fiscal Regime; Investment Decision Support Tool
Downloads
References
1. Daniel, P., Keen, M., & McPherson, C. (Eds.). (2010). The taxation of petroleum and minerals: Principles, problems and practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Johnston, D. (2003). International petroleum fiscal systems and production sharing contracts. PennWell Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Mian, M. A. (2011). Project Economics and Decision Analysis: Volume 1 – Deterministic Models (2nd ed.). PennWell Corporation, Chapter 6, pp. 251–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Tordo, S. (2007). Fiscal systems for hydrocarbons: Design issues (World Bank Working Paper No. 123). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Tordo, S., Johnston, D., & Johnston, D. (2010). Petroleum exploration and production rights: Allocation strategies and design issues (World Bank Working Paper No. 179). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Tordo, S., Warner, M., Manzano, O., & Anouti, Y. (2013). Local content policies in the oil and gas sector. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dike, S. C., & Okparaibea, N. (2023). An appraisal of the fiscal laws of oil and gas industry operation in Nigeria. AJIEEL, 7(01), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Echendu, J. C., Iledare, O. O., & Onwuka, E. I. (2015). Comparative Economic-Performance Analysis of Production-Sharing Contracts in Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and Nigeria. SPE Economics & Management, 7(04), 157-166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Adedayo, A. V. (2014). A comparative study of the petroleum fiscal systems of Nigeria and Angola. Available from the Department of Oil and Gas Management, South America University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Iwok, U., & Daniel, U. (2026). The Petroleum Industry Act (2021) and Nigeria’s fiscal regime: A desk review of taxation, governance, and revenue mobilization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Nwosi-Anele, A., & Iledare, O. (2024). Assessing the attractiveness and progressiveness of the fiscal framework in the 2021 Nigeria Petroleum Industry Act under a zero-carbon emission strategy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Clement U., Eze, B. U., & Kingsley, I. (2025). Impact of Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) on Production Sharing Contract (PSC) cost recovery analysis in oil and gas management budgeting in Niger Delta, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Adeogun, O., Iledare, O. O., & Adekunle, J. I. (2018). Profitability of marginal oilfields in a low oil price regime: A stochastic modelling analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Sunday, A. A., & Kelechukwu, N. E. (2023). Analysis of the Petroleum Industry Act and its impact on the Nigerian oil and gas sector. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nwankwo, O. K., & Ringim, A. U. (2024). Implementation of Petroleum Industry Act 2021: A pathway for economic prosperity and sustainable development in Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Nwankwo, O. K., & Atebe, O. J. (2024). Comparative analysis of best-in-class regulatory frameworks implemented in the petroleum industry vis-à-vis the Petroleum Industry Act, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Paul, I. O. (2021). An analysis of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021 as a panacea to achieving the economic objectives in Chapter Two of Nigeria’s Constitution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nnaemeka, U., & Eke, N. P. (2025). Petroleum legislation and the economic impact of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) in Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Adedamola, A., Mdondo, J., Agbo, C., & Samuel, P. (2022). The impact of the Petroleum Industry Act on the economics of small and stranded gas fields in Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Obakhume, K. A., Igwe, E. R., Olugbeje, O. T., & Adeyemi, O. V. (2026). Shifting the balance: Fiscal attractiveness of Nigeria's petroleum regimes before and after the Petroleum Industry Act. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Adeyemo, V. A. (2014). A comparative study of the petroleum fiscal systems of Nigeria and Angola. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Abdulsalam, M. (2016). Effect of petroleum fiscal regime and tax instruments on the investment climate of marginal oil field in Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Adeogun, O., Iledare, O. O., & Adekunle, J. I. (2018). Profitability of marginal oilfields in a low oil price regime: A stochastic modelling analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Petter, O., & Anders, W. (2024). Petroleum development projects: Concept selection, taxation and recovery rate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Dongkun, L., & Yan, N. (2010). Assessment of fiscal terms of international petroleum contracts. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Fubara, S. A., Iledare, O. O., & Akinlawon, A. J. (2018). Economic evaluation of the dual petroleum tax system proposed in the 2017 Nigeria fiscal reform framework. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Joseph, C. E., Iledare, O. O., Adeyemi, J. A., & Adekunle, J. I. (2018). Replacing Petroleum Profit Tax with a dual petroleum tax system: Implication on petroleum project economics in Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Coddou, G., Hammond, R., Laaveg, M., Ogunyomi, B., Raeder, A., Svensson, M., & Xu, P. (2012). Fiscal System Modeling Framework. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/162893-MS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Amina, D., Ibiye, I., Gbenga, O., Oghenerume, O., & Jesse, A. (2023). Evaluation of the profitability of marginal field investment using the fiscal provisions in the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Begg, S. H., & Smith, N. (2007). Sensitivity of project economics to uncertainty in type and parameters of oil price models. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Asuquo, C. K. (2026). Strategic planning under price volatility: A game-theoretic model of investment decisions by Nigerian upstream operators. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Prince, I., Yakubu, W., & Russien, M. (2026). Gas utilisation investment decisions supporting Nigeria's energy transition: A techno-economic framework for the Niger Delta region [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria