A Comparative Analysis of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment Frameworks in India and Abroad: Focus on Framingham and Score Based Models

SCORE and its updated version, SCORE 2, have been largely centered in Europe and focused on predictive schemes for fatal CVD events; they do not have any validation from Indian populations due to a shortage of longitudinal data (Kasim et al., 2023). The WHO/ISH charts, popular in resource-limited settings for their simplicity, underperform in identifying risks in young adults and women (Selvarajah et al., 2014). Depending mostly on conventional risk factors, these models don't include social determinants of health such as education, income, occupational stress, air pollution, and localized dietary habits, all of which shape India's CVD profile (Prabhakaran et al., 2016; Mathur et al., 2024). There is still insufficient representation of rural populations, and apart from that, these models suffer a practical dead-end: low clinical adoption, digital integration, as well as patient engagement have greatly hindered implementation.
While there remain prevention prospects under Ayushman Bharat and NPCDCS, a lack of a dynamic, India-specific CVD risk tool is certainly denying the country an effective population-level screening-means and intervention. While FRS and SCORE provide valuable foundations, their limitations in the Indian context necessitate development of inclusive, data-driven, and locally validated frameworks to better manage and reduce the country’s growing CVD burden.

Cardiovascular disease, Framingham risk Score, SCORE 2, India

1. Artigao-Rodenas, L. M., Carbayo-Herencia, J. A., Divisón-Garrote, J. A., Gil-Guillén, V. F., Massó-Orozco, J., & Orozco-Beltrán, D. (2013). Framingham Risk Score for prediction of cardiovascular diseases. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone .0073529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. D'Agostino, R. B., Vasan, R. S., Pencina, M. J., Wolf, P. A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J. M., & Kannel, W. B. (2008). General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation, 117(6), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gupta, P., Patel, S. A., Ali, M. K., Goenka, S., & Prabhakaran, D. (2019). Cardiovascular risk prediction in India: Comparison of the original and recalibrated Framingham prognostic models in urban populations. Welcome Open Research, 4, 71. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15235.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kasim, S. S., Sharma, R., Sinha, R., & Kumar, A. (2023). Validation of the general Framingham Risk Score in South Asian populations: A review of calibration and discrimination. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 35, 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.lanwpc.2023.100742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kulothungan, V., Mathur, P., Kalra, O. P., & Reddy, K. S. (2024). Ten-year risk assessment for cardiovascular disease and associated factors in an Indian population using WHO/ISH and Framingham Risk Scores. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 159, 429– 440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lloyd-Jones, D.M. (2010). Cardiovascular risk prediction: Basic concepts, current status, and future directions, Circulation, 121, 1768-1777. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mathur, P., Kulothungan, V., Kalra, O. P., Gupta, R., & Prabhakaran, D. (2024). Evaluation of the WHO cardiovascular disease risk prediction charts in India: A state-wise epidemiological application. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 159, 441–455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. National Health Policy, 2017, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Prabhakaran, D., Jeemon, P., & Roy, A. (2016). Cardiovascular diseases in India: Current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation, 133(16), 1605–1620. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008729 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rodondi, N., Collet, T. H., Baumgartner, C., Cornuz, J., Ghali, W. A., Auer, R., & Cornuz, J. (2012). Framingham Risk Score and alternatives for prediction of coronary heart disease in older adults. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e34287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone .0034287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Selvarajah, S., Kaur, A., Chidambaram, M., Siddique, S., & Chee, M. L. (2014). Comparison of cardiovascular risk prediction models and applicability to low- and middleincome countries. International Journal of Cardiology, 176(1), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijcard.2014 .06.017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Empowering SME Performance Through Social Media: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs
• Effective School Bullying Prevention Strategies: A Thematic Review
• Impact of Workplace Conflict on the Operational Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Enugu State.
• Towards Digital Financial Solutions: A Conceptual Model of SME Strategies and Strategic Development
• Effect of Work-Life Balance and Affective Commitment on Employee Performance in the Hotel Industry in Plateau State