Beyond Sample Storage: Container-Induced Analyte Loss and Its Implications for Forensic Toxicological Analysis
Authors
Division of Criminology and Forensic Science, School of Science, Arts and Media, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India (India)
Division of Physical Science, School of Science, Arts and Media, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India (India)
Division of Physical Science, School of Science, Arts and Media, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India (India)
Division of Criminology and Forensic Science, School of Science, Arts and Media, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1310000045
Subject Category: Forensic Science
Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 639-652
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-13
Accepted: 2026-10-18
Published: 2026-10-31
Abstract
The quantity of a toxin analyzed in the lab depends on what was present in the specimen or sample during collection and the subsequent methods applied to the sample. This research examines the stability of hazardous substances in both investigative and clinical samples concerning a standard jar, its sealing method, and the storage conditions. This narrative review analyzes peer-reviewed articles found through specific searches of the indexed literature, verified by their original records, using 34 sources. No numerical risk-of-bias score was applied; the quality of the evidence was instead graded qualitatively (Table 2). Lipophilic medicines, particularly cannabis, have the strongest container evidence, indicating that adhering to plastic surfaces is a significant pathway for loss. Tetrahydrocannabinol losses were from 60 to 100% in polystyrene and 30 to 50% in glass when whole blood was stored at −20 °C for 4 to 24 weeks. The recoveries of eleven synthetic cannabinoids in oral fluid kept at room temperature for 72 h varied from 9 to 54% in polypropylene and from 84 to 114% in borosilicate glass. In urine, the amount of loss of the THC carboxylic acid metabolite depended on plastic type, solution’s pH, exposure time, and internal bar-code labels, which showed a loss of almost 50%, compared to 14% for external ones. Storage temperature, freeze-thaw cycles, anticoagulants, antioxidants, and non-ionic surfactants were additional factors that needed consideration. Because almost all container comparisons concern cannabinoids, these are used as a model, and practical recommendations are limited to analyte–matrix–container combinations that have been validated. No container comparisons were found for metals, cyanide, volatile poisons, or traditional pesticides in the sources examined, so any extension of the cannabinoid findings to these toxicants remains an untested inference; this is a major limitation of the available literature
Keywords
Forensic toxicology; sample vessels; adsorption loss; glass and plastic; biological specimens; additives
Downloads
References
1. Djilali E, Pappalardo L, Posadino AM, Giordo R, Pintus G. Effects of the storage conditions on the stability of natural and synthetic cannabis in biological matrices for forensic toxicology analysis: an update from the literature. Metabolites. 2022;12(9):801. doi:10.3390/metabo12090801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Nowatzke W, Woolf E. Best practices during bioanalytical method validation for the characterization of assay reagents and the evaluation of analyte stability in assay standards, quality controls, and study samples. AAPS J. 2007;9(2):E117-E122. doi:10.1208/aapsj0902013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chen J, Hsieh Y. Stabilizing drug molecules in biological samples. Ther Drug Monit. 2005;27:617-624. doi:10.1097/01.ftd.0000170879.18139.40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Jamerson MH, McCue JJ, Klette K. Urine pH, container composition, and exposure time influence adsorptive loss of 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid. J Anal Toxicol. 2005;29:627-631. doi:10.1093/jat/29.7.627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Roth KD, Siegel NA, Johnson RW Jr, Litauszki L, Salvati L Jr, Harrington CA, et al. Investigation of the effects of solution composition and container material type on the loss of 11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-carboxylic acid. J Anal Toxicol. 1996;20:291-300. doi:10.1093/jat/20.5.291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Stout PR, Horn CK, Lesser DR. Loss of THCCOOH from urine specimens stored in polypropylene and polyethylene containers at different temperatures. J Anal Toxicol. 2000;24:567-571. doi:10.1093/jat/24.7.567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Christophersen AS. Tetrahydrocannabinol stability in whole blood: plastic versus glass containers. J Anal Toxicol. 1986;10(4):129-131. doi:10.1093/jat/10.4.129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kneisel S, Speck M, Moosmann B, Auwärter V. Stability of 11 prevalent synthetic cannabinoids in authentic neat oral fluid samples: glass versus polypropylene containers at different temperatures. Drug Test Anal. 2013;5:602-606. doi:10.1002/dta.1497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Meneses V, Mata D. Cannabinoid stability in antemortem and postmortem blood. J Anal Toxicol. 2019;44:126-132. doi:10.1093/jat/bkz073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Molnar A, Lewis J, Fu S. Recovery of spiked Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid from polypropylene containers. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;227:69-73. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.11.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Desrosiers NA, Lee D, Scheidweiler KB, Concheiro-Guisan M, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA. In vitro stability of free and glucuronidated cannabinoids in urine following controlled smoked cannabis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:785-792. doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7524-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Giardino NJ. Stability of 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in negative human urine in high-density polyethylene (Nalgene). J Anal Toxicol. 1996;20:275-276. doi:10.1093/jat/20.4.275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Bond GD 2nd, Chand P, Walia AS, Liu RH. Observation of reduced concentration of Δ9-THC-carboxylic acid in urine specimen containers using internal barcode labels. J Anal Toxicol. 1990;14:389-390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Johnson JR, Jennison TA, Peat MA, Foltz RL. Stability of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC, and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC in blood and plasma. J Anal Toxicol. 1984;8:202-204. doi:10.1093/jat/8.5.202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Scheidweiler KB, Schwope DM, Karschner EL, Desrosiers NA, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA. In vitro stability of free and glucuronidated cannabinoids in blood and plasma following controlled smoked cannabis. Clin Chem. 2013;59:1108-1117. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.201467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Scheidweiler KB, Himes SK, Desrosiers NA, Huestis MA. In vitro stability of free and glucuronidated cannabinoids in blood and plasma collected in plastic gray-top sodium fluoride tubes following controlled smoked cannabis. Forensic Toxicol. 2016;34:179-185. doi:10.1007/s11419-015-0290-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Toennes SW, Kauert GF. Importance of vacutainer selection in forensic toxicological analysis of drugs of abuse. J Anal Toxicol. 2001;25:339-343. doi:10.1093/jat/25.5.339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Welsh ER, Snyder JJ, Klette KL. Stabilization of urinary THC solutions with a simple non-ionic surfactant. J Anal Toxicol. 2009;33:51-55. doi:10.1093/jat/33.1.51 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Moore C, Vincent M, Rana S, Coulter C, Agrawal A, Soares J. Stability of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in oral fluid using the Quantisal collection device. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;164:126-130. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Crouch D. Oral fluid collection: the neglected variable in oral fluid testing. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;150:165-173. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.02.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Hess C, Krueger L, Unger M, Madea B. Freeze-thaw stability and long-term stability of 84 synthetic cannabinoids in serum. Drug Test Anal. 2017;9:1506-1511. doi:10.1002/dta.2133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sørensen LK, Hasselstrøm JB. The effect of antioxidants on the long-term stability of THC and related cannabinoids in sampled whole blood. Drug Test Anal. 2018;10:301-309. doi:10.1002/dta.2221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Fort C, Jourdan T, Kemp J, Curtis B. Stability of synthetic cannabinoids in biological specimens: analysis through liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol. 2017;41:360-366. doi:10.1093/jat/bkx015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Skopp G, Pötsch L. An investigation of the stability of free and glucuronidated 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in authentic urine samples. J Anal Toxicol. 2004;28:35-40. doi:10.1093/jat/28.1.35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Fraga SG, Estévez JD, Romero CD. Stability of cannabinoids in urine in three storage temperatures. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1998;28:160-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ciuti R, Quercioli M, Borsotti M. Drug of abuse stability in native urine specimens vs. stabilized urine samples. Biochim Clin. 2014;38:103-109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. White RM. Instability and poor recovery of cannabinoids in urine, oral fluid, and hair. Forensic Sci Rev. 2018;30:33-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mercolini L, Mandrioli R, Sorella V, Somaini L, Giocondi D, Serpelloni G, et al. Dried blood spots: liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and its main metabolites. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1271:33-40. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Protti M, Rudge J, Sberna AE, Gerra G, Mercolini L. Dried haematic microsamples and LC-MS/MS for the analysis of natural and synthetic cannabinoids. J Chromatogr B. 2017;1044:77-86. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.12.038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Kyriakou C, Marchei E, Scaravelli G, García-Algar O, Supervía A, Graziano S. Identification and quantification of psychoactive drugs in whole blood using dried blood spot (DBS) by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016;128:53-60. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2016.05.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Lee D, Huestis MA. Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid. Drug Test Anal. 2014;6:88-111. doi:10.1002/dta.1514 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Karschner EL, Swortwood-Gates MJ, Huestis MA. Identifying and quantifying cannabinoids in biological matrices in the medical and legal cannabis era. Clin Chem. 2020;66:888-914. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaa113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Alfazil AA. Stability of drugs and pesticides of forensic toxicological interest and their metabolites in biological samples [PhD thesis]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Choi H, Baeck S, Kim E, Lee S, Jang M, Lee J, et al. Analysis of cannabis in oral fluid specimens by GC-MS with automatic SPE. Sci Justice. 2009;49:242-246. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.09.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-926. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Peters FT, Drummer OH, Musshoff F. Validation of new methods. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:216-224. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Murakoshi M, Fukuzawa K, Sato Y, Asakawa N. Adsorption phenomenon and development of low adsorption vials for LC and LC/MS [technical poster]. Shimadzu Corporation. Available from: https://lcms.labrulez.com/paper/11001 (accessed 21 October 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Vial glass quality [technical white paper WP21833]. Available from: https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/CMD/Reference-Materials/wp-21833-ccs-vial-glass-quality-wp21833-en.pdf (accessed 21 October 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Jones AW. Are changes in blood-ethanol concentration during storage analytically significant? Importance of method imprecision. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:1299-1304. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2007.289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Alluhayb AH, Severance C, Hendry-Hofer T, Bebarta VS, Logue BA. Can the cyanide metabolite, 2-aminothiazoline-4-carboxylic acid, be used for forensic verification of cyanide poisoning? Forensic Toxicol. 2024;42(2):221-231. doi:10.1007/s11419-024-00690-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Tusiewicz K, Wachełko O, Zawadzki M, Szpot P. The stability of cyanide in human biological samples. A systematic review, meta-analysis and determination of cyanide (GC-QqQ-MS/MS) in an authentic casework 7 years after fatal intoxication. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2024;34(3):271-282. doi:10.1080/15376516.2023.2280212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. McAllister JL, Roby RJ, Levine B, Purser D. Stability of cyanide in cadavers and in postmortem stored tissue specimens: a review. J Anal Toxicol. 2008;32(8):612-620. doi:10.1093/jat/32.8.612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- How to Encrypt & Decrypt Secret Message Using Invisible Ink
- A Comparative Study on Understanding Forensic Accounting and Auditing Compared to Traditional Accounting and Auditing.
- Detecting Procurement Fraud in the Public Sector
- Mapping Polygraph: A Bibliometric Analysis and Evolving Scientific Trajectory
- Determination of the Consistency and Persistency of Developed Latent Prints Using Factors of Exposure: Experimental Research