A Method to Calibrate Metal Length Measuring Rulers by Mechanical Comparison

A Length measuring stick (length measuring ruler) is a very fundamental length measuring tool uses in many sectors such as construction industry, material processing industry, Apparel industry testing and calibration industry, and household. These measuring sticks are manufactured by different manufactures across the world and uses different references to mark the length on the sticks. Therefore, confirmation of maintaining the measurement traceability of length measuring sticks to the primary standard before their use is very essential. Even though sophisticated calibration systems are available globally for the calibration of length sticks, purchasing such a system became difficult due to high costs. As a solution, a low-cost mechanism for the calibration of industrial metal length measuring sticks is proposed here. The proposed method determines the length of the intervals of an unknown length stick (test ruler) in comparison with a pre-calibrated reference standard rule. The difference in length between test and reference ruler is measured by a mechanical movement of the reference standard ruler until coinciding the scale mark of the reference ruler with the corresponding scale mark of the test ruler. The linear movement of the reference ruler is measured by a dial gauge. The length of the test ruler is calculated by considering other factors such as the length of the standard stick and overall temperature correction as well. A calibration system was developed to determine length of the length intervals of test rulers in compliance to the proposed method. The combined uncertainty was calculated for the length determined by the proposed system using the proposed method and was ±0.33 mm at k =1 level corresponds to 68% confidence. The results from the proposed method were compared with the results from existing calibration methods and in compliance when the results are considered with above quoted uncertainty.

Metal length measuring sticks, Calibration, Mechanical Comparison, Reference Standard, Measurement traceability

1. British Standard Institution. (1968). Specification for Engineers steel measuring rules. British Standard 4372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Japanese Standards Association. (1977). Meter Rulers. Japanese Industrial Standard B 7516. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. International Organization for Standardization. (2017). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Pfeifer, T. (1989). Dimensional metrology in production and quality control. 3rd international symposium on dimensional metrology in production and quality control (ISMQC-3), Aachen (Germany, F.R), 761. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. National Institute of Standards and technology. (2014). Calibration of Metal Tapes, Tape-to-Tape Method. SOP No.12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2014). Calibration of Rigid Rules. SOP No.10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Feinmess Suhl GmbH. (2025). Operating Manual-Measuring Tape Calibrator BMG,3. http://www.feinmess-suhl.de. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Greef, P., Kruger, O. (2014). Cost effective robust rule calibration System. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 5(402). https://doi. 10.1051/ijmqe/2014015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wang, P., Zhao, H., & Ren, G. (2022). Development and Application of Standard Device for Calibrating Steel Measuring Tape Based on Machine Vision. Applied Science, Vol. 12(7262), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. National Institute of Standards and Technology GMP No.09, Good Measuring Practices for equations for metallic Tapes, (2014). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liyanawaduge, N. P., Sooriyaarchchi, A. (2022). A method to calibrate steel length measuring tapes by mechanical comparison, Sri Lankan Journal of Technology. (SLJoT), Vol. 3(01),1- 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. ElMelegy, A.M. (2023). Uncertainty Evaluation in calibration of Engineer’s Steel Rulers and Measuring Tapes; GUM and Monte Carlo Methods. Journal of Measurement Science & Applications (JMS), 3(1), 64-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hegazy, R. S., Mohamed, M. I. (2023). Error analysis and uncertainty evaluation for the determination of stress intensity factor by caustic. Journal of Measurement Science & Applications (JMS), 3(2), 57-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]