Personal Experiences of College Students in Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology in Mathematics

In the fast-changing landscape of 21st-century education, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as ChatGPT, Mathway, and GeoGebra has relevantly shaped how college students interact with mathematics. This qualitative-descriptive study scrutinizes the personal experiences, attitudes, and practice specimens of ten college students in the Philippines who have utilized AI tools in mathematics learning. Guided by Constructivist Learning Theory, Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research explores how AI affects students’ conceptual understanding, problem-solving confidence, and learning behaviors. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Findings reveal a nuanced duality: while students perceive AI as a helpful learning companion that enhances clarity, motivation, and autonomy, they also express cautious trust and concern over potential over-reliance and cognitive passivity. AI utilization was found to be largely student-driven and peer-influenced, with learners critically sailing its benefits and limitations. The study underscores the need for AI literacy, balanced usage, and institutional assistance to ensure AI serves as a scaffold for deeper mathematical understanding rather than a shortcut for convenience. These insights inform educators and policymakers aiming to integrate AI in mathematics education responsibly and equitably.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Mathematics Education

1. Alkhatib, M. et al. (2021). Students’ Attitudes toward AI-Assisted Learning in STEM Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1317–1336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2022). Can artificial intelligence enhance students' self-regulated learning in higher education? Journal of Educational Computing Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ekanayake, S. Y., & Wishart, J. (2020). Mobile AI-assisted tools in mathematics education: An overview. Computers & Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Holstein, K., Hong, G., & Aleven, V. (2019). Student learning benefits of AI tutors in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Holstein, K., Wortman, A., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. (2020). Student and teacher perspectives on using AI in the classroom. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Krouska, A., Troussas, C., & Virvou, M. (2020). Enhancing e-learning with AI-driven technologies: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 10(18), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Luckin et al. (2016) emphasized that while AI can support learning, students must be trained to use it critically, otherwise it may weaken conceptual understanding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples