Gaps Between Policy and Practice: Corporal Punishment Prohibition Under the RTE Act in Indian Education

The current study looked at the ongoing discrepancy between policy and reality regarding the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009's ban on corporal punishment in Indian schools. Despite the Act's formal prohibition on all types of physical and psychological abuse of children, there was evidence that corporal punishment persisted in some form, especially in government and rural institutions. Teachers, administrators, parents, and students in a few districts of Bihar participated in both quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews as part of the study's mixed-methods approach. The results showed that although there was a fair amount of knowledge about the RTE Act, little was known about its ramifications or how it was consistently applied. The continued use of corporal punishment was facilitated by teachers' traditional views on discipline, a lack of proper training, lax institutional oversight, and societal acceptance of harsh methods. In order to guarantee the achievement of children's rights and the establishment of secure, welcoming learning environments that are in line with the goals of the RTE Act, the study emphasized the necessity of extensive teacher sensitization programs, more robust policy enforcement mechanisms, and community-level campaigning.

Right to Education Act, corporal punishment, educational policy

1. Chanana, K. (2025). Societal Context and Corporal Punishment in Schools: Toward Equitable Education and Positive Outcomes. Sociological Bulletin, 74(2), 115-131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Jain, R., & Gautam, J. (2024). Prevalence and Demography of Corporal Punishment: A Study on Middle School Students. Journal of Ravishankar University, 30(2), 64-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Johnson, C. (2023). Child Rights in India Comprehensive Analysis of Legal Frameworks and Implementation Challenges. Issue 4 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, 2414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kumar, H. (2022). Right to Education in India. WKRISHIND PUBLISHERS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Maheshwari, S. (2021). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Indian JL & Legal Rsch., 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mann, M. (2014). Prohibition of Corporal Punishments & Innovative Methods of Positive Discipline. Shikshan Anveshika, 4(1), 32-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nawani, D. (2013). Corporal punishment in schools. Economic and Political Weekly, 23-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sahoo, D., & Mishra, S. (2020). Perception of Students about Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 in Tribal Areas of Odisha. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Salam, A. (2021). Elementary education in India and RTE act and its implementation. International Journal of Reviews and Research in Social Sciences, 9(4), 147-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sarin, M. N. (2019). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE) in India (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sawhney, S. (2018). Tokenisation of children’s right to safe and protected environments–Indian teachers’ perspectives on school corporal punishment. Martínez Sainz, G. and Ilie, S. International Perspectives on Practice and Research into Children’s Rights. Mexico: Centre for Human Rights Studies, 111-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sharma, A., & Mitra, S. (2023). Rationalisation of schools and its impact on children’s right to education: Narratives of violation of the RTE Act 2009. Social Change, 53(4), 500-517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sheokand, U. (2023). Critical Assessment of RTE Act in India and It's Comparative Statistical Assessment With Special Reference To PTR, Corporal Punishment, and Work-Load Parameters. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 14(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tiwari, A. (2014). Teachers, discipline, and the corporal punishment ban in Delhi, India. The Pennsylvania State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tiwari, A. (2019). The corporal punishment ban in schools: Teachers’ attitudes and classroom practices. Educational Studies, 45(3), 271-284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.